Echocardiographic reference ranges of myocardial work in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133040
Xander Jacquemyn , Benjamin T. Barnes , Sruti Rao , Shelby Kutty
{"title":"Echocardiographic reference ranges of myocardial work in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis","authors":"Xander Jacquemyn ,&nbsp;Benjamin T. Barnes ,&nbsp;Sruti Rao ,&nbsp;Shelby Kutty","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Establishing reference values for LV myocardial work (MW) is essential before its widespread implementation in pediatrics. This study aims to provide normal LV MW ranges, encompassing global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Databases were searched through February 1st, 2024, for studies reporting MW indices in healthy children across pediatric age categories. Weighted means were obtained from random-effect models with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify sex or geographic differences. Meta-regression analysis was used to identify modulating effects of demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search yielded 104 articles, of which, 12 articles with 1037 patients (age 10.7 ± 0.7 years, 47.5 % female) were eligible for inclusion. The reported normal overall pooled mean values of GWI and GCW were 1525.4 (95 % CI, 1328.1–1722.6) mmHg% and 1880.3 (95 % CI, 1683.6–2077.0) mmHg%, respectively. Pooled mean GWW was 57.2 (95 % CI, 51.9–62.5) mmHg%, and pooled mean GWE was 96.8 (95 % CI, 96.6–97.0) %. Subgroup analysis found no sex differences (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.050), but significant regional variations: GCW and GWW differed in European or US cohorts versus East Asian cohorts (<em>P</em> = 0.033 and <em>P</em> = 0.039, respectively). Meta-regression identified age, blood pressure, and heart rate as significant modulators. Pooled inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.86 to 0.96, while pooled intra-observer ICCs ranged from 0.81 to 0.93, indicating excellent reproducibility.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We provide age-specific MW reference ranges for children, valuable for both clinical and research purposes, and confirm the reproducibility of MW.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"424 ","pages":"Article 133040"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016752732500083X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Establishing reference values for LV myocardial work (MW) is essential before its widespread implementation in pediatrics. This study aims to provide normal LV MW ranges, encompassing global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE).

Methods

Databases were searched through February 1st, 2024, for studies reporting MW indices in healthy children across pediatric age categories. Weighted means were obtained from random-effect models with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify sex or geographic differences. Meta-regression analysis was used to identify modulating effects of demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic variables.

Results

The search yielded 104 articles, of which, 12 articles with 1037 patients (age 10.7 ± 0.7 years, 47.5 % female) were eligible for inclusion. The reported normal overall pooled mean values of GWI and GCW were 1525.4 (95 % CI, 1328.1–1722.6) mmHg% and 1880.3 (95 % CI, 1683.6–2077.0) mmHg%, respectively. Pooled mean GWW was 57.2 (95 % CI, 51.9–62.5) mmHg%, and pooled mean GWE was 96.8 (95 % CI, 96.6–97.0) %. Subgroup analysis found no sex differences (P > 0.050), but significant regional variations: GCW and GWW differed in European or US cohorts versus East Asian cohorts (P = 0.033 and P = 0.039, respectively). Meta-regression identified age, blood pressure, and heart rate as significant modulators. Pooled inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.86 to 0.96, while pooled intra-observer ICCs ranged from 0.81 to 0.93, indicating excellent reproducibility.

Conclusions

We provide age-specific MW reference ranges for children, valuable for both clinical and research purposes, and confirm the reproducibility of MW.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青少年心肌工作的超声心动图参考范围:荟萃分析。
背景:在儿科广泛应用左室心肌功(MW)之前,建立参考值至关重要。本研究旨在提供正常的低压兆瓦范围,包括全球工作指数(GWI)、全球建设性工作(GCW)、全球浪费工作(GWW)和全球工作效率(GWE)。方法:检索截至2024年2月1日的数据库,检索各儿科年龄组健康儿童的MW指数。加权均值来自随机效应模型,相应的95% %置信区间(CI)。进行亚组分析以确定性别或地理差异。meta回归分析用于确定人口统计学、临床和超声心动图变量的调节作用。结果:检索到104篇文献,其中12篇文献纳入1037例患者(年龄10.7 ± 0.7 岁,女性47.5% %)。报告的GWI和GCW的正常总体汇总平均值分别为1525.4(95 % CI, 1328.1-1722.6) mmHg%和1880.3(95 % CI, 1683.6-2077.0) mmHg%。合并平均GWW为57.2(95 % CI, 51.9-62.5) mmHg%,合并平均GWE为96.8(95 % CI, 96.6-97.0) %。亚组分析未发现性别差异(P > 0.050),但存在显著的区域差异:GCW和GWW在欧洲或美国队列与东亚队列中存在差异(P = 0.033和P = 0.039)。meta回归发现年龄、血压和心率是重要的调节因子。合并观察者间类内相关系数(ICCs)范围为0.86 ~ 0.96,合并观察者内相关系数(ICCs)范围为0.81 ~ 0.93,表明具有良好的再现性。结论:我们为儿童提供了特定年龄的MW参考范围,对临床和研究都有价值,并证实了MW的可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
期刊最新文献
Impact of absolute stent expansion on two-year clinical outcomes after PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Results from the OCT-guided PCI registry (TACTICS registry). Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for treating de novo proximal left anterior descending artery lesions: Insights from the REC-CAGEFREE I trial. Early development and SGLT2 inhibitor-mediated reversal of coronary microvascular dysfunction in an isoprenaline-induced murine HFpEF model: Insights from multimodal in vivo imaging. Timing of cardiogenic shock and clinical outcomes in takotsubo syndrome: A multicenter cohort study. Cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure and coronary artery disease: Improving healthcare system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1