Randomized Trial of Biolimus DCB for In-Stent Restenosis

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JACC. Cardiovascular interventions Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.11.026
Robert A. Byrne MB BCh, PhD , Joo-Yong Hahn MD, PhD , Peter O’Kane MD , Manel Sabaté MD , Ralph Toelg MD , Samuel Copt PhD , Sean Fitzgerald MB BCh , Marie-Claude Morice MD , Jasper Trevelyan MD , Darren Mylotte MD , Antonio Fernandez Ortiz MD, PhD , Himanshu Rai PhD , Rory Durand MB BCh , Jochen Wöhrle MD , Franz Xever Kleber MD , Giuilo Stefanini MD , Fernando Alfonso MD, PhD
{"title":"Randomized Trial of Biolimus DCB for In-Stent Restenosis","authors":"Robert A. Byrne MB BCh, PhD ,&nbsp;Joo-Yong Hahn MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Peter O’Kane MD ,&nbsp;Manel Sabaté MD ,&nbsp;Ralph Toelg MD ,&nbsp;Samuel Copt PhD ,&nbsp;Sean Fitzgerald MB BCh ,&nbsp;Marie-Claude Morice MD ,&nbsp;Jasper Trevelyan MD ,&nbsp;Darren Mylotte MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Fernandez Ortiz MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Himanshu Rai PhD ,&nbsp;Rory Durand MB BCh ,&nbsp;Jochen Wöhrle MD ,&nbsp;Franz Xever Kleber MD ,&nbsp;Giuilo Stefanini MD ,&nbsp;Fernando Alfonso MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcin.2024.11.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In recent years, drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has become an established treatment option for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to compare the angiographic and clinical performance of the Biolimus A9–coated balloon (BCB; Biosensors Europe) with that of the paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB; SeQuent Please, Braun Melsungen).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>REFORM (Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of the Biolimus A9™ Drug Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis: First-in-Man Trial) was a multicenter, assessor-blinded, noninferiority, 2:1 randomized controlled trial comparing the BCB and the PCB for the treatment of coronary ISR. The primary endpoint was in-segment percentage diameter stenosis at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included target lesion failure. The trial was registered prospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (<span><span>NCT04079192</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 202 patients were randomized at 20 centers in 6 countries, with 135 in the BCB group and 67 in the PCB group. The mean patient age was 68.5 ± 10 years. At 6 months, in-segment percentage diameter stenosis was 43.3% ± 22.9% in the BCB group compared with 31.4% ± 17.7% in the PCB group (95% CI for the difference: 4.9%-18.8%; prespecified noninferiority margin 12%, noninferiority <em>P</em> = 0.48). At 1 year, target lesion failure was observed in 23.7% of patients in the BCB group vs 17.1% in the PCB group (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.72-2.88; <em>P</em> = 0.28).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with ISR, the REFORM study failed to demonstrate noninferiority of the investigational biolimus DCB compared with the standard paclitaxel DCB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14688,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":"18 5","pages":"Pages 654-662"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879824017370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In recent years, drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has become an established treatment option for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the angiographic and clinical performance of the Biolimus A9–coated balloon (BCB; Biosensors Europe) with that of the paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB; SeQuent Please, Braun Melsungen).

Methods

REFORM (Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of the Biolimus A9™ Drug Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis: First-in-Man Trial) was a multicenter, assessor-blinded, noninferiority, 2:1 randomized controlled trial comparing the BCB and the PCB for the treatment of coronary ISR. The primary endpoint was in-segment percentage diameter stenosis at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included target lesion failure. The trial was registered prospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04079192).

Results

A total of 202 patients were randomized at 20 centers in 6 countries, with 135 in the BCB group and 67 in the PCB group. The mean patient age was 68.5 ± 10 years. At 6 months, in-segment percentage diameter stenosis was 43.3% ± 22.9% in the BCB group compared with 31.4% ± 17.7% in the PCB group (95% CI for the difference: 4.9%-18.8%; prespecified noninferiority margin 12%, noninferiority P = 0.48). At 1 year, target lesion failure was observed in 23.7% of patients in the BCB group vs 17.1% in the PCB group (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.72-2.88; P = 0.28).

Conclusions

In patients with ISR, the REFORM study failed to demonstrate noninferiority of the investigational biolimus DCB compared with the standard paclitaxel DCB.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biolimus DCB治疗支架内再狭窄的随机试验:REFORM研究的主要结果。
背景:近年来,药物包被球囊(DCB)血管成形术已成为治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄(ISR)的一种成熟的治疗选择。目的:本研究的目的是比较Biolimus a9涂层球囊(BCB;生物传感器欧洲)与紫杉醇涂层气球(PCB;请继续,布朗·麦尔松根)。方法:REFORM(确定Biolimus A9™药物包被球囊治疗支架内再狭窄安全性和有效性的前瞻性、随机、非效性试验:首次人体试验)是一项多中心、评估盲、非效性、2:1随机对照试验,比较BCB和PCB治疗冠状动脉ISR的疗效。主要终点是6个月时节段内管径狭窄百分比。次要终点包括靶病变失败。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04079192)前瞻性注册。结果:共有202例患者被随机分配到6个国家的20个中心,其中BCB组135例,PCB组67例。患者平均年龄68.5±10岁。6个月时,BCB组节段内管径狭窄百分比为43.3%±22.9%,而PCB组为31.4%±17.7% (95% CI: 4.9%-18.8%;预设非劣效性裕度12%,非劣效性P = 0.48)。1年后,23.7%的BCB组患者观察到靶病变失败,而17.1%的PCB组患者观察到靶病变失败(HR: 1.44;95% ci: 0.72-2.88;p = 0.28)。结论:在ISR患者中,REFORM研究未能证明研究性生物莫司DCB与标准紫杉醇DCB相比具有非劣效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.80%
发文量
756
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions is a specialist journal launched by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It covers the entire field of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including cardiac, peripheral, and cerebrovascular interventions. The journal publishes studies that will impact the practice of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including clinical trials, experimental studies, and in-depth discussions by respected experts. To enhance visual understanding, the journal is published both in print and electronically, utilizing the latest technologies.
期刊最新文献
Postdilation of Evolut Transcatheter Heart Valves: Insights From Bench Testing. Reply Editorial Board Impact of Valve Frame Height on PCI Outcomes After TAVR Coronary Anchor Wire to Facilitate BA-BASILICA for Protruding Left Main Stent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1