Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab in elderly patients with severe asthma: insights from the REDES study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY Journal of Asthma Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1080/02770903.2025.2463956
Eva Martínez-Moragón, Celia Pinedo, Luis Puente-Maestu, Mariana Muñoz-Esquerre, Ana Gómez-Bastero, Jacinto Ramos, Miguel Díaz-Palacios, Tamara Hermida, David Bañas-Conejero, Santiago Quirce
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab in elderly patients with severe asthma: insights from the REDES study.","authors":"Eva Martínez-Moragón, Celia Pinedo, Luis Puente-Maestu, Mariana Muñoz-Esquerre, Ana Gómez-Bastero, Jacinto Ramos, Miguel Díaz-Palacios, Tamara Hermida, David Bañas-Conejero, Santiago Quirce","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2025.2463956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Asthma and severe asthma are problems affecting all age groups, but asthma is frequently undiagnosed in the elderly, due to the poor perception of airflow limitation, lack of fitness, and presence of multiple comorbidities. Even so, the proportion of patients with severe asthma aged ≥65 is significant, and data on efficacy of asthma medications in the elderly are sometimes limited. We report here the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab (an IL-5 inhibitor) in elderly (≥65 years) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The REDES study was an observational, multicenter study of the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab 100 mg SC every 4 weeks in 318 severe asthma patients in Spain. This post-hoc analysis compares the effectiveness and safety of patients ≥65 years old to patients <65 years after 12 months of mepolizumab treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27% of patients were ≥65 years old, compared with 73% of patients <65 years. Elderly patients showed a trend toward less frequent comorbid nasal polyps (<i>p</i> = 0.06) and a lower proportion of atopic sensitization (as detected by prick test or specific IgE) (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Similar improvements were noted in ACT score (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), comparable exacerbation reductions (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and lung function parameters (<i>p</i> < 0.04 in elder group and <i>p</i> < 0.0001 in younger elder group), although an apparent greater reduction of OCS daily dose was observed in elder patients (<i>p</i> = 0.0002). No new safety signals were reported in the elderly population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study further supports mepolizumab as an effective and well tolerated therapy in the difficult to treat population of elderly patients with severe asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2463956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Asthma and severe asthma are problems affecting all age groups, but asthma is frequently undiagnosed in the elderly, due to the poor perception of airflow limitation, lack of fitness, and presence of multiple comorbidities. Even so, the proportion of patients with severe asthma aged ≥65 is significant, and data on efficacy of asthma medications in the elderly are sometimes limited. We report here the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab (an IL-5 inhibitor) in elderly (≥65 years) patients.

Methods: The REDES study was an observational, multicenter study of the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab 100 mg SC every 4 weeks in 318 severe asthma patients in Spain. This post-hoc analysis compares the effectiveness and safety of patients ≥65 years old to patients <65 years after 12 months of mepolizumab treatment.

Results: 27% of patients were ≥65 years old, compared with 73% of patients <65 years. Elderly patients showed a trend toward less frequent comorbid nasal polyps (p = 0.06) and a lower proportion of atopic sensitization (as detected by prick test or specific IgE) (p = 0.02). Similar improvements were noted in ACT score (p < 0.0001), comparable exacerbation reductions (p < 0.0001), and lung function parameters (p < 0.04 in elder group and p < 0.0001 in younger elder group), although an apparent greater reduction of OCS daily dose was observed in elder patients (p = 0.0002). No new safety signals were reported in the elderly population.

Conclusions: This study further supports mepolizumab as an effective and well tolerated therapy in the difficult to treat population of elderly patients with severe asthma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
期刊最新文献
Dried fruit, acetate, and asthma: a mediation Mendelian randomization analysis. Causal effects of pediatric asthma on psychiatric disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Construction of indicators for evaluating the quality of extended care for children with asthma. Efficacy of medical education combined with extended care on adherence to inhaled glucocorticoids and clinical effects in patients with bronchial asthma. Emotion regulation among adults with asthma: Links with short-acting inhaler medication overuse and utilization of acute medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1