Post-Mortem Imaging to Investigate the Causes of Stillbirth in Australia: Views of Parents, Midwives and Obstetricians.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.13828
Siobhan A Loughnan, Aleena M Wojcieszek, Laura Singline, Alison Griffin, Frances M Boyle, David Ellwood, Vicki Flenady, Stacy Goergen
{"title":"Post-Mortem Imaging to Investigate the Causes of Stillbirth in Australia: Views of Parents, Midwives and Obstetricians.","authors":"Siobhan A Loughnan, Aleena M Wojcieszek, Laura Singline, Alison Griffin, Frances M Boyle, David Ellwood, Vicki Flenady, Stacy Goergen","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is increasing interest regarding the role and value of post-mortem imaging in identifying the causes of stillbirth. We sought to understand the experiences of parents and the perceptions and practices of midwives and obstetricians regarding post-mortem imaging (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound and X-rays of the baby), in the investigation of stillbirths, and how its use and perceived value compares to that of other stillbirth investigations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional, web-based surveys of parents who experienced stillbirth in Australia from 2018 to 2022 and midwives and obstetricians involved in the care of parents who experienced stillbirth in the same 5 years. Data were analysed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 68 parents and 94 midwives and obstetricians were included. According to parents, post-mortem imaging (CT, MRI, ultrasound and X-ray) were the least discussed (1%-16%) and performed (0%-13%) stillbirth investigations. Twenty-eight percent of midwives and obstetricians had recommended the option of post-mortem imaging to parents, while 45% felt that doing so was beyond their scope of practice. Relative to autopsy, midwives and obstetricians were often unsure of the value of MRI across a range of clinical scenarios, and CT, MRI, ultrasound and X-ray were the investigations least often discussed (17%-47%) with parents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-mortem imaging is currently underutilised in the investigation of stillbirths. Education and training are needed to enhance maternity care professionals' awareness of the role and value of imaging for identifying the causes of stillbirths, and how best to discuss these investigations with families.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13828","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is increasing interest regarding the role and value of post-mortem imaging in identifying the causes of stillbirth. We sought to understand the experiences of parents and the perceptions and practices of midwives and obstetricians regarding post-mortem imaging (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound and X-rays of the baby), in the investigation of stillbirths, and how its use and perceived value compares to that of other stillbirth investigations.

Methods: Cross-sectional, web-based surveys of parents who experienced stillbirth in Australia from 2018 to 2022 and midwives and obstetricians involved in the care of parents who experienced stillbirth in the same 5 years. Data were analysed descriptively.

Results: Data from 68 parents and 94 midwives and obstetricians were included. According to parents, post-mortem imaging (CT, MRI, ultrasound and X-ray) were the least discussed (1%-16%) and performed (0%-13%) stillbirth investigations. Twenty-eight percent of midwives and obstetricians had recommended the option of post-mortem imaging to parents, while 45% felt that doing so was beyond their scope of practice. Relative to autopsy, midwives and obstetricians were often unsure of the value of MRI across a range of clinical scenarios, and CT, MRI, ultrasound and X-ray were the investigations least often discussed (17%-47%) with parents.

Conclusions: Post-mortem imaging is currently underutilised in the investigation of stillbirths. Education and training are needed to enhance maternity care professionals' awareness of the role and value of imaging for identifying the causes of stillbirths, and how best to discuss these investigations with families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Stability of Thermoablation Antenna Using a Patient-Mounted Navigation System: Initial Clinical Experience. Survey to assess present practice and address challenges in gynaecological brachytherapy in Australia and New Zealand. Comparing Outcomes of Per-Oral Image-Guided Gastrostomy With Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomy at a Quaternary Australian Hospital. Insights and Considerations to Enhance Risk Prediction Models for CT-Guided Lung Biopsy Complications. Post-Mortem Imaging to Investigate the Causes of Stillbirth in Australia: Views of Parents, Midwives and Obstetricians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1