Tweeted, Trolled, Twisted: Battling for Narrative Control in E-Cigarette Use Prevention Campaigns (2014-2020).

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-03-28 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1080/10810730.2025.2462682
Miao Feng, Chandler C Carter, Simon Page, Sherry L Emery, Hy Tran, Ganna Kostygina
{"title":"Tweeted, Trolled, Twisted: Battling for Narrative Control in E-Cigarette Use Prevention Campaigns (2014-2020).","authors":"Miao Feng, Chandler C Carter, Simon Page, Sherry L Emery, Hy Tran, Ganna Kostygina","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2025.2462682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study identifies and analyzes X (formerly Twitter) posts related to 14 e-cigarette use prevention campaigns from 2014 to 2020, assessing message volume, content, sources, potential reach and engagement. Using supervised machine learning, we classified 618,965 tweets, finding 43% contained opposition messaging. Two regional campaigns received the highest levels of opposition, with over 99% of related tweets classified as opposition. However, prevention/neutral messages exhibited 92% higher potential reach than opposition messages. Geolocation analysis suggested that regional campaigns may have struggled to focus their impact within targeted jurisdictions. These findings illustrate the dual role of social media as both an amplifier of prevention messages and a platform for oppositional narratives, underscoring the need for public health practitioners to develop adaptive strategies to enhance the impact of digital campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"39-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2025.2462682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study identifies and analyzes X (formerly Twitter) posts related to 14 e-cigarette use prevention campaigns from 2014 to 2020, assessing message volume, content, sources, potential reach and engagement. Using supervised machine learning, we classified 618,965 tweets, finding 43% contained opposition messaging. Two regional campaigns received the highest levels of opposition, with over 99% of related tweets classified as opposition. However, prevention/neutral messages exhibited 92% higher potential reach than opposition messages. Geolocation analysis suggested that regional campaigns may have struggled to focus their impact within targeted jurisdictions. These findings illustrate the dual role of social media as both an amplifier of prevention messages and a platform for oppositional narratives, underscoring the need for public health practitioners to develop adaptive strategies to enhance the impact of digital campaigns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推特、喷子、扭曲:在电子烟使用预防运动中争夺叙事控制(2014-2020)。
本研究确定并分析了2014年至2020年期间与14项预防电子烟使用活动相关的X条(以前的Twitter)帖子,评估了消息量、内容、来源、潜在覆盖范围和参与度。使用监督式机器学习,我们对618965条推文进行了分类,发现43%包含反对信息。两个地区的竞选活动遭到了最高程度的反对,超过99%的相关推文被归类为反对。然而,预防/中立信息的潜在到达率比反对信息高92%。地理定位分析表明,区域活动可能难以将其影响集中在目标辖区内。这些发现说明了社交媒体的双重作用,既是预防信息的放大器,也是对立叙事的平台,强调了公共卫生从业人员需要制定适应性战略,以解决错误信息并增强数字运动的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
期刊最新文献
From Knowledge to Action: Effects of HPV Knowledge, HPV Vaccine Attitude, Gender, and HPV Vaccine Safety Concerns on HPV Vaccination Intent. Health Communication at a Crossroads as the Journal of Health Communication Begins Its 4th Decade of Publication. Delivering Change: The Diffusion of Doula Awareness in Black American Communities. A Machine Learning Approach to Analyzing Main Topics and Sentiments in YouTube's Portrayal of HIV/AIDS in China. How Defense and Accuracy Motives Influence Health Information Seeking and Avoidance: A Dual-Motive Model Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1