Excellent Outcomes in Obese Patients Following Cementless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Surgical technology international Pub Date : 2025-02-04
Matthew L Magruder, Tanner McClure, Kevin Marchand, Michael A Mont, Robert C Marchand
{"title":"Excellent Outcomes in Obese Patients Following Cementless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Matthew L Magruder, Tanner McClure, Kevin Marchand, Michael A Mont, Robert C Marchand","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The results of cementless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) have not been evaluated in obese patient populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of aseptic loosening, patient-reported outcomes, and surgical complications of cementless RA-TKA cases in obese and nonobese patient cohorts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review between 2018 to 2021 of a single-surgeon series was conducted, producing 1,546 patients. Patients were categorized as either obese (body mass index [BMI] <35) or nonobese (BMI <35), generating 472 and 1,092 patients, respectively. The average BMI was 40.5 (range, 35.0 to 64.1) in the obese group and 28.6 (range, 16.5 to 34.9) in the nonobese group. The primary outcome was the rate of aseptic loosening. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, comprising Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) scores, and the reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (r-WOMAC) scores. Charts were reviewed to establish rates of postoperative surgical complications. Significance tests were conducted using either t-tests or Chi-squared independence tests, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no cases of aseptic loosening in the obese or nonobese cohorts, making survivorship 100% for both. While preoperative KOOS JR and r-WOMAC scores were significantly worse in the obese group, they were not statistically significant at either six-week or 12-month timepoints. The obese cohort had statistically greater improvements in r-WOMAC total scores at six weeks and 12 months; they also had statistically significant superior improvement in KOOS JR at 12 months. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative surgical-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that rates of aseptic loosening and patient-reported outcomes in obese patients undergoing RA-TKA are excellent, and patient-reported outcomes demonstrated superior improvement in the obese cohort compared to those in the non-obese cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":"45 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The results of cementless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) have not been evaluated in obese patient populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of aseptic loosening, patient-reported outcomes, and surgical complications of cementless RA-TKA cases in obese and nonobese patient cohorts.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review between 2018 to 2021 of a single-surgeon series was conducted, producing 1,546 patients. Patients were categorized as either obese (body mass index [BMI] <35) or nonobese (BMI <35), generating 472 and 1,092 patients, respectively. The average BMI was 40.5 (range, 35.0 to 64.1) in the obese group and 28.6 (range, 16.5 to 34.9) in the nonobese group. The primary outcome was the rate of aseptic loosening. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, comprising Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) scores, and the reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (r-WOMAC) scores. Charts were reviewed to establish rates of postoperative surgical complications. Significance tests were conducted using either t-tests or Chi-squared independence tests, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: There were no cases of aseptic loosening in the obese or nonobese cohorts, making survivorship 100% for both. While preoperative KOOS JR and r-WOMAC scores were significantly worse in the obese group, they were not statistically significant at either six-week or 12-month timepoints. The obese cohort had statistically greater improvements in r-WOMAC total scores at six weeks and 12 months; they also had statistically significant superior improvement in KOOS JR at 12 months. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative surgical-related complications.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that rates of aseptic loosening and patient-reported outcomes in obese patients undergoing RA-TKA are excellent, and patient-reported outcomes demonstrated superior improvement in the obese cohort compared to those in the non-obese cohort.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
期刊最新文献
An Insert Goniometer Identifies One Insert Thickness That Provides Maximum Tibial Rotation During Kinematically Aligned TKA Using a Medial Parapatellar Approach. The Effectiveness of Currently Available Synthetic Skin Therapies. Excellent Outcomes in Obese Patients Following Cementless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty. Robotic-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in an Outpatient Setting. Advancements in Wound Bed Preparation of Chronic Wounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1