Atrial fibrillation outcomes in patients from Asia and non-Asia countries: insights from GARFIELD-AF.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-003109
Chun-Yan Cheng, Tian-Yu Lian, Xi-Jie Zhu, Saverio Virdone, Kai Sun, John Camm, Xian-Mei Li, Shinya Goto, Karen Pieper, Gloria Kayani, Xian-Hong Fang, Zhi-Cheng Jing, Ajay K Kakkar
{"title":"Atrial fibrillation outcomes in patients from Asia and non-Asia countries: insights from GARFIELD-AF.","authors":"Chun-Yan Cheng, Tian-Yu Lian, Xi-Jie Zhu, Saverio Virdone, Kai Sun, John Camm, Xian-Mei Li, Shinya Goto, Karen Pieper, Gloria Kayani, Xian-Hong Fang, Zhi-Cheng Jing, Ajay K Kakkar","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in the clinical outcomes and level of risk among Asian versus non-Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been sparsely investigated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a contemporary prospective comparison of outcomes for newly diagnosed patients with AF, between Asian and non-Asian regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six Asian countries (China, Japan, India, Singapore, South Korea and Thailand) and 29 countries outside Asia participated in the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-AF (GARFIELD-AF) study. Newly diagnosed patients with AF, enrolled between 2010 and 2016, were followed up for≥2 years. The outcome studies were all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding. The association of geographical region with clinical outcomes (event rates per 100 person-years) were estimated using multivariable Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 841/52 057 (26.6%) GARFIELD-AF participants were enrolled in Asia. Average age and prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities were lower than in non-Asian countries and patients at high risk of stroke (ie, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc≥2 excl. sex) were less frequently anticoagulated (60.1% vs 73.2%). Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) was similar in both regions (∼28%), though Asian patients were more frequently underdosed. Both Asian and non-Asian patients who received NOAC at enrolment experienced lower all-cause mortality and non-haemorrhagic stroke/SE compared with patients on other treatments or none.All-cause mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding were less frequent in patients from Asia versus non-Asia (HR (95% CI): 0.62 (0.39 to 0.99), 0.52 (0.28 to 0.97), 0.58 (0.36 to 0.96), respectively). Associations of moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease and vascular disease with increased risk of all-cause mortality were stronger in Asian versus non-Asian patients (interaction p values: 0.0250 and 0.0076, respectively). There was notable heterogeneity in oral anticoagulant (OAC) usage within the Asian countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in Asian countries had a lower risk of all-cause mortality and major bleeding compared to the rest of the world. NOAC had evident benefits for reducing mortality and stroke across populations. Further studies on sociocultural impacts on OAC outcomes are needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01090362.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differences in the clinical outcomes and level of risk among Asian versus non-Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been sparsely investigated.

Objective: To provide a contemporary prospective comparison of outcomes for newly diagnosed patients with AF, between Asian and non-Asian regions.

Methods: Six Asian countries (China, Japan, India, Singapore, South Korea and Thailand) and 29 countries outside Asia participated in the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-AF (GARFIELD-AF) study. Newly diagnosed patients with AF, enrolled between 2010 and 2016, were followed up for≥2 years. The outcome studies were all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding. The association of geographical region with clinical outcomes (event rates per 100 person-years) were estimated using multivariable Cox models.

Results: 13 841/52 057 (26.6%) GARFIELD-AF participants were enrolled in Asia. Average age and prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities were lower than in non-Asian countries and patients at high risk of stroke (ie, CHA2DS2-VASc≥2 excl. sex) were less frequently anticoagulated (60.1% vs 73.2%). Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) was similar in both regions (∼28%), though Asian patients were more frequently underdosed. Both Asian and non-Asian patients who received NOAC at enrolment experienced lower all-cause mortality and non-haemorrhagic stroke/SE compared with patients on other treatments or none.All-cause mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding were less frequent in patients from Asia versus non-Asia (HR (95% CI): 0.62 (0.39 to 0.99), 0.52 (0.28 to 0.97), 0.58 (0.36 to 0.96), respectively). Associations of moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease and vascular disease with increased risk of all-cause mortality were stronger in Asian versus non-Asian patients (interaction p values: 0.0250 and 0.0076, respectively). There was notable heterogeneity in oral anticoagulant (OAC) usage within the Asian countries.

Conclusions: Patients in Asian countries had a lower risk of all-cause mortality and major bleeding compared to the rest of the world. NOAC had evident benefits for reducing mortality and stroke across populations. Further studies on sociocultural impacts on OAC outcomes are needed.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01090362.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自亚洲和非亚洲国家患者的房颤结局:GARFIELD-AF的见解
背景:亚洲人与非亚洲人房颤(AF)患者的临床结局和风险水平差异的研究很少。目的:对亚洲和非亚洲地区新诊断的房颤患者的预后进行前瞻性比较。方法:6个亚洲国家(中国、日本、印度、新加坡、韩国和泰国)和29个亚洲以外的国家参加了FIELD-AF全球抗凝血登记(GARFIELD-AF)研究。2010 - 2016年间入组的新诊断房颤患者,随访≥2年。结果研究包括全因死亡率、心血管和非心血管死亡率、非出血性卒中/全身性栓塞(SE)、大出血。使用多变量Cox模型估计地理区域与临床结果(每100人年事件发生率)的关联。结果:13 841/52 057(26.6%)名GARFIELD-AF参与者在亚洲入组。心血管合并症的平均年龄和患病率低于非亚洲国家和卒中高危患者(即CHA2DS2-VASc≥2除外)。性别)抗凝次数较少(60.1% vs 73.2%)。非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOAC)在两个地区相似(约28%),尽管亚洲患者更经常剂量不足。与接受其他治疗或未接受治疗的患者相比,接受NOAC治疗的亚洲和非亚洲患者的全因死亡率和非出血性卒中/SE均较低。亚洲患者的全因死亡率、非心血管死亡率和大出血发生率低于非亚洲患者(HR (95% CI)分别为0.62(0.39 ~ 0.99)、0.52(0.28 ~ 0.97)、0.58(0.36 ~ 0.96))。亚洲患者与非亚洲患者相比,中度至重度慢性肾脏疾病和血管疾病与全因死亡风险增加的相关性更强(相互作用p值分别为0.0250和0.0076)。口服抗凝剂(OAC)在亚洲国家的使用存在显著的异质性。结论:与世界其他地区相比,亚洲国家患者的全因死亡率和大出血风险较低。NOAC在降低人群死亡率和中风方面有明显的好处。需要进一步研究社会文化对OAC结果的影响。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01090362。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Association of Life's Simple 7 with metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease and non-invasive fibrosis markers. Risk prediction modelling of 30-day all-cause mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population: leveraging machine learning. Prognostic impact of corticosteroid maintenance dose and re-escalation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Retrospective analysis of the performance of the PROMISE minimal risk tool for patients presenting with recent onset stable chest pain. Development and validation of diagnostic and prognostic models for heart failure in unstable angina patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1