Chun-Yan Cheng, Tian-Yu Lian, Xi-Jie Zhu, Saverio Virdone, Kai Sun, John Camm, Xian-Mei Li, Shinya Goto, Karen Pieper, Gloria Kayani, Xian-Hong Fang, Zhi-Cheng Jing, Ajay K Kakkar
{"title":"Atrial fibrillation outcomes in patients from Asia and non-Asia countries: insights from GARFIELD-AF.","authors":"Chun-Yan Cheng, Tian-Yu Lian, Xi-Jie Zhu, Saverio Virdone, Kai Sun, John Camm, Xian-Mei Li, Shinya Goto, Karen Pieper, Gloria Kayani, Xian-Hong Fang, Zhi-Cheng Jing, Ajay K Kakkar","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in the clinical outcomes and level of risk among Asian versus non-Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been sparsely investigated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a contemporary prospective comparison of outcomes for newly diagnosed patients with AF, between Asian and non-Asian regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six Asian countries (China, Japan, India, Singapore, South Korea and Thailand) and 29 countries outside Asia participated in the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-AF (GARFIELD-AF) study. Newly diagnosed patients with AF, enrolled between 2010 and 2016, were followed up for≥2 years. The outcome studies were all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding. The association of geographical region with clinical outcomes (event rates per 100 person-years) were estimated using multivariable Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 841/52 057 (26.6%) GARFIELD-AF participants were enrolled in Asia. Average age and prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities were lower than in non-Asian countries and patients at high risk of stroke (ie, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc≥2 excl. sex) were less frequently anticoagulated (60.1% vs 73.2%). Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) was similar in both regions (∼28%), though Asian patients were more frequently underdosed. Both Asian and non-Asian patients who received NOAC at enrolment experienced lower all-cause mortality and non-haemorrhagic stroke/SE compared with patients on other treatments or none.All-cause mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding were less frequent in patients from Asia versus non-Asia (HR (95% CI): 0.62 (0.39 to 0.99), 0.52 (0.28 to 0.97), 0.58 (0.36 to 0.96), respectively). Associations of moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease and vascular disease with increased risk of all-cause mortality were stronger in Asian versus non-Asian patients (interaction p values: 0.0250 and 0.0076, respectively). There was notable heterogeneity in oral anticoagulant (OAC) usage within the Asian countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in Asian countries had a lower risk of all-cause mortality and major bleeding compared to the rest of the world. NOAC had evident benefits for reducing mortality and stroke across populations. Further studies on sociocultural impacts on OAC outcomes are needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01090362.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Differences in the clinical outcomes and level of risk among Asian versus non-Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been sparsely investigated.
Objective: To provide a contemporary prospective comparison of outcomes for newly diagnosed patients with AF, between Asian and non-Asian regions.
Methods: Six Asian countries (China, Japan, India, Singapore, South Korea and Thailand) and 29 countries outside Asia participated in the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-AF (GARFIELD-AF) study. Newly diagnosed patients with AF, enrolled between 2010 and 2016, were followed up for≥2 years. The outcome studies were all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding. The association of geographical region with clinical outcomes (event rates per 100 person-years) were estimated using multivariable Cox models.
Results: 13 841/52 057 (26.6%) GARFIELD-AF participants were enrolled in Asia. Average age and prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities were lower than in non-Asian countries and patients at high risk of stroke (ie, CHA2DS2-VASc≥2 excl. sex) were less frequently anticoagulated (60.1% vs 73.2%). Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) was similar in both regions (∼28%), though Asian patients were more frequently underdosed. Both Asian and non-Asian patients who received NOAC at enrolment experienced lower all-cause mortality and non-haemorrhagic stroke/SE compared with patients on other treatments or none.All-cause mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding were less frequent in patients from Asia versus non-Asia (HR (95% CI): 0.62 (0.39 to 0.99), 0.52 (0.28 to 0.97), 0.58 (0.36 to 0.96), respectively). Associations of moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease and vascular disease with increased risk of all-cause mortality were stronger in Asian versus non-Asian patients (interaction p values: 0.0250 and 0.0076, respectively). There was notable heterogeneity in oral anticoagulant (OAC) usage within the Asian countries.
Conclusions: Patients in Asian countries had a lower risk of all-cause mortality and major bleeding compared to the rest of the world. NOAC had evident benefits for reducing mortality and stroke across populations. Further studies on sociocultural impacts on OAC outcomes are needed.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.