Intersectoral Collaboration Between Traditional Bonesetters and Formal Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Past Initiatives and Stakeholder Perspectives.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1002/wjs.12503
Joost J Binnerts, Thom C C Hendriks, Samia Hussein, Nefti Bempong-Ahun, Geoffrey C Ibbotson, William J Harrison, Claude Martin, Kavitha Ranganathan, Anam N Ehsan, Bwire M Chirangi, Michael J R Edwards, Erik Hermans
{"title":"Intersectoral Collaboration Between Traditional Bonesetters and Formal Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Past Initiatives and Stakeholder Perspectives.","authors":"Joost J Binnerts, Thom C C Hendriks, Samia Hussein, Nefti Bempong-Ahun, Geoffrey C Ibbotson, William J Harrison, Claude Martin, Kavitha Ranganathan, Anam N Ehsan, Bwire M Chirangi, Michael J R Edwards, Erik Hermans","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone fractures in low- and middle-income countries are commonly managed by traditional bonesetters (TBSs). Past studies emphasize the potential for improved fracture care through intersectoral cooperation. This review gauged support among stakeholders for intersectoral collaboration and the results of previous initiatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five medical databases were reviewed. Studies focusing on stakeholder perspectives and articles detailing collaborative initiatives were included. Data extraction and synthesis were carried out using the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group's template. Additionally, all studies underwent quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3821 identified articles, 16 were included after full-text screening. Twelve articles presented stakeholder perspectives, whereas four discussed collaborative initiatives. The overall article quality was low: articles on stakeholder perspectives scored on average 1.42 out of 4 points, whereas articles on collaborative initiatives scored a mean 1.25 points. In total, 62% of stakeholders (75% of TBSs, 92% of hospital staff, and 52% of patients) expressed support for intersectoral collaboration. The ratio between stakeholders expressing support versus those opposing was 4.4:1. No articles presented data on governmental perspectives. The most mentioned collaborative forms were TBS training (24% of stakeholders) and an integrative model (16% of stakeholders). Interventional studies all consisted of TBS training, reporting improved clinical outcomes and increased practice integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the limited and low-quality evidence on collaboration initiatives and perspectives, most stakeholders seem supportive of intersectoral collaboration, with training and integration being commonly suggested. Future research efforts exploring the feasibility of embedding TBSs into current primary care systems should ensure the involvement of local and national government.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"652-663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bone fractures in low- and middle-income countries are commonly managed by traditional bonesetters (TBSs). Past studies emphasize the potential for improved fracture care through intersectoral cooperation. This review gauged support among stakeholders for intersectoral collaboration and the results of previous initiatives.

Methods: Five medical databases were reviewed. Studies focusing on stakeholder perspectives and articles detailing collaborative initiatives were included. Data extraction and synthesis were carried out using the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group's template. Additionally, all studies underwent quality assessment.

Results: Of the 3821 identified articles, 16 were included after full-text screening. Twelve articles presented stakeholder perspectives, whereas four discussed collaborative initiatives. The overall article quality was low: articles on stakeholder perspectives scored on average 1.42 out of 4 points, whereas articles on collaborative initiatives scored a mean 1.25 points. In total, 62% of stakeholders (75% of TBSs, 92% of hospital staff, and 52% of patients) expressed support for intersectoral collaboration. The ratio between stakeholders expressing support versus those opposing was 4.4:1. No articles presented data on governmental perspectives. The most mentioned collaborative forms were TBS training (24% of stakeholders) and an integrative model (16% of stakeholders). Interventional studies all consisted of TBS training, reporting improved clinical outcomes and increased practice integration.

Conclusion: Despite the limited and low-quality evidence on collaboration initiatives and perspectives, most stakeholders seem supportive of intersectoral collaboration, with training and integration being commonly suggested. Future research efforts exploring the feasibility of embedding TBSs into current primary care systems should ensure the involvement of local and national government.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统接骨师和正规医疗保健之间的跨部门合作:对过去倡议和利益相关者观点的系统回顾。
背景:在低收入和中等收入国家,骨折通常由传统接骨师(tbs)治疗。过去的研究强调通过部门间合作改善骨折护理的潜力。本次审查评估了利益攸关方对部门间合作的支持程度以及以往举措的成果。方法:查阅5个医学数据库。其中包括关注利益相关者观点的研究和详细介绍协作计划的文章。使用Cochrane消费者与沟通评估小组的模板进行数据提取和合成。此外,所有研究都进行了质量评估。结果:在3821篇确定的文章中,16篇通过全文筛选被纳入。12篇文章展示了利益相关者的观点,而4篇文章讨论了合作计划。整体的文章质量很低:关于利益相关者观点的文章平均得分为1.42分,而关于协作计划的文章平均得分为1.25分。总体而言,62%的利益攸关方(75%的tbs、92%的医院工作人员和52%的患者)表示支持部门间合作。支持与反对的比例为4.4:1。没有文章提供关于政府观点的数据。提到最多的合作形式是TBS培训(24%的利益相关者)和综合模式(16%的利益相关者)。介入研究均包括TBS培训,报告改善的临床结果和增加的实践整合。结论:尽管关于合作倡议和观点的证据有限且质量较低,但大多数利益相关者似乎支持部门间合作,并普遍建议进行培训和整合。未来探索将tbs嵌入当前初级保健系统的可行性的研究工作应确保地方和国家政府的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Different Knots, Same Outcome: Evaluating the Role of Surgical Technique on Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation. Delivery of Surgical Care by Local Actors in Chronic Conflict Settings: The Example of Bor State Hospital, South Sudan. The Price of a Whipple: Predicting Hospital Charges Using Preoperative Patient Characteristics. Operating Together: Challenges and Solutions for Sustaining Impactful Global Health Partnerships From 18 years of the RCSI/COSECSA Surgical Training Collaboration. Clinical and Inflammatory Predictors of False-Negative Ultrasound in Children With Suspected Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1