An adversarial risk analysis framework for software release decision support.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1111/risa.17711
Refik Soyer, Fabrizio Ruggeri, David Rios Insua, Cason Pierce, Cesar Guevara
{"title":"An adversarial risk analysis framework for software release decision support.","authors":"Refik Soyer, Fabrizio Ruggeri, David Rios Insua, Cason Pierce, Cesar Guevara","doi":"10.1111/risa.17711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent artificial intelligence (AI) risk management frameworks and regulations place stringent quality constraints on AI systems to be deployed in an increasingly competitive environment. Thus, from a software engineering point of view, a major issue is deciding when to release an AI system to the market. This problem is complex due to, among other features, the uncertainty surrounding the AI system's reliability and safety as reflected through its faults, the various cost items involved, and the presence of competitors. A novel general adversarial risk analysis framework with multiple agents of two types (producers and buyers) is proposed to support an AI system developer in deciding when to release a product. The implementation of the proposed framework is illustrated with an example and extensions to cases with multiple producers and multiple buyers are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"4196-4212"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.17711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent artificial intelligence (AI) risk management frameworks and regulations place stringent quality constraints on AI systems to be deployed in an increasingly competitive environment. Thus, from a software engineering point of view, a major issue is deciding when to release an AI system to the market. This problem is complex due to, among other features, the uncertainty surrounding the AI system's reliability and safety as reflected through its faults, the various cost items involved, and the presence of competitors. A novel general adversarial risk analysis framework with multiple agents of two types (producers and buyers) is proposed to support an AI system developer in deciding when to release a product. The implementation of the proposed framework is illustrated with an example and extensions to cases with multiple producers and multiple buyers are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件发布决策支持的对抗风险分析框架。
最近的人工智能(AI)风险管理框架和法规对在竞争日益激烈的环境中部署的人工智能系统施加了严格的质量限制。因此,从软件工程的角度来看,一个主要问题是决定何时向市场发布AI系统。这个问题很复杂,因为人工智能系统的可靠性和安全性的不确定性(通过其故障反映出来)、涉及的各种成本项目以及竞争对手的存在。为了支持人工智能系统开发人员决定何时发布产品,提出了一种具有两种类型(生产者和购买者)的多主体的通用对抗风险分析框架。通过一个例子说明了所提出的框架的实现,并讨论了多生产者和多购买者情况的扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Risk Analysis Framework for Medical AI: A Mixed-Methods Approach. AI in Carbon Sink Trading: Using Attack Trees to Assess Low- to Medium-Risk Scenarios. Correction to "Does the exponential Wells-Riley model provide a good fit for human coronavirus and rhinovirus? A comparison of four dose-response models based on human challenge data". Risk-Resilience Feedback to Assure Critical Societal Functions. Corrigendum to "The Lasting Effect of the Romantic View of Nature: How It Influences Perceptions of Risk and the Support of Symbolic Actions Against Climate Change" (Risk Analysis, 2025; 45: 1399-1409).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1