Diagnosing conflict in clerkship: insights from medical students' experiences.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Leader Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1136/leader-2024-001123
Erin S Barry, Joseph C L'Huillier, Bobbie Ann Adair White
{"title":"Diagnosing conflict in clerkship: insights from medical students' experiences.","authors":"Erin S Barry, Joseph C L'Huillier, Bobbie Ann Adair White","doi":"10.1136/leader-2024-001123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conflict is an inevitable part of clinical training and often arises from differences in opinions or misunderstandings. Most studies around healthcare conflict focus on perspectives of physicians and nurses, overlooking medical students' unique perspectives. This study explores medical students' experiences with conflicts during clerkship, examining types, triggers, and conflict management styles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An educational session introduced medical students to conflict types, conflict management modes, and triggers. A total of 167 students wrote reflections about conflicts experienced or observed during their rotations. Both quantitative and qualitative elements were analysed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conflicts most frequently occurred during surgery (n=49, 32.9%) and internal medicine (n=41, 27.5%) rotations, often involving residents (n=110, 44.7%) and attendings (n=55, 22.4%). Task-related conflicts were most common (n=113, 53.8%), with students primarily using an avoiding (n=91, 60.3%) mode, while others were perceived as using a competing (n=122, 65.2%) mode. Most conflicts were reported as being handled poorly (n=107, 64.8%). Students described five main conflict triggers: (1) conflicts stemming from unclear expectations; (2) hostile or false communication as a conflict driver; (3) unsafe environments reinforced by hierarchy and power; (4) mistrust in team relationships and (5) resident stress impacting student experiences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Identifying conflict characteristics from a student perspective can guide curricular improvements to better prepare students for clerkships and professional practice. Awareness of conflict management styles, types and triggers enables proactive conflict resolution, fostering growth or constructive outcomes. Findings emphasise the importance of setting clear expectations, maintaining effective communication, building psychologically safe environments, reducing stress and establishing trust between students and residents. Based on medical students' reflections, these patterns may extend to other health professions, offering a broader relevance for training and research in conflict management across clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Conflict is an inevitable part of clinical training and often arises from differences in opinions or misunderstandings. Most studies around healthcare conflict focus on perspectives of physicians and nurses, overlooking medical students' unique perspectives. This study explores medical students' experiences with conflicts during clerkship, examining types, triggers, and conflict management styles.

Methods: An educational session introduced medical students to conflict types, conflict management modes, and triggers. A total of 167 students wrote reflections about conflicts experienced or observed during their rotations. Both quantitative and qualitative elements were analysed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Conflicts most frequently occurred during surgery (n=49, 32.9%) and internal medicine (n=41, 27.5%) rotations, often involving residents (n=110, 44.7%) and attendings (n=55, 22.4%). Task-related conflicts were most common (n=113, 53.8%), with students primarily using an avoiding (n=91, 60.3%) mode, while others were perceived as using a competing (n=122, 65.2%) mode. Most conflicts were reported as being handled poorly (n=107, 64.8%). Students described five main conflict triggers: (1) conflicts stemming from unclear expectations; (2) hostile or false communication as a conflict driver; (3) unsafe environments reinforced by hierarchy and power; (4) mistrust in team relationships and (5) resident stress impacting student experiences.

Discussion: Identifying conflict characteristics from a student perspective can guide curricular improvements to better prepare students for clerkships and professional practice. Awareness of conflict management styles, types and triggers enables proactive conflict resolution, fostering growth or constructive outcomes. Findings emphasise the importance of setting clear expectations, maintaining effective communication, building psychologically safe environments, reducing stress and establishing trust between students and residents. Based on medical students' reflections, these patterns may extend to other health professions, offering a broader relevance for training and research in conflict management across clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Winding up to wind down: designing the end of one's medical career with intentionality. Diagnosing conflict in clerkship: insights from medical students' experiences. The Kind Organisation. 'What Matters to Staff Programme': eight steps to improve staff well-being at work. Impact of microgeography on communication dynamics in a healthcare environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1