Addition of Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia Does Not Reduce Postoperative Opioid Use Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.042
Reza Ojaghi M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C., Hamid Nessek M.D., Emmitt Hayes M.D., Matthew Macciacchera M.D., Eric Locke M.D., Pardise Elmi B.Sc., Sophie Henke Tarnow B.Sc., Geoffrey Dervin M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Allan Liew M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Michael Pickell M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C.
{"title":"Addition of Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia Does Not Reduce Postoperative Opioid Use Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery","authors":"Reza Ojaghi M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C.,&nbsp;Hamid Nessek M.D.,&nbsp;Emmitt Hayes M.D.,&nbsp;Matthew Macciacchera M.D.,&nbsp;Eric Locke M.D.,&nbsp;Pardise Elmi B.Sc.,&nbsp;Sophie Henke Tarnow B.Sc.,&nbsp;Geoffrey Dervin M.D., F.R.C.S.C.,&nbsp;Allan Liew M.D., F.R.C.S.C.,&nbsp;Michael Pickell M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This propensity-matched cohort study aimed to determine if adding adductor canal block (ACB) to local infiltration analgesia (LIA) reduces immediate postoperative opioid use in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and assess variations based on graft type.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed ACL reconstructions performed from 2019 to 2021. Patients were included if they received either LIA alone or a combination of LIA and ACB. Patients were propensity-matched based on demographic and surgical factors, and perioperative opioid consumption was assessed. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on autograft type (hamstring, quadriceps tendon, and bone–patellar tendon–bone).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed in intraoperative, postanesthesia care unit, or total perioperative opioid consumption between the ACB + LIA group (27.76 ± 14.01 mg) and the LIA-only group (28.58 ± 12.56 mg). This finding was consistent across all autograft types. However, in the hamstring autograft subgroup, the addition of ACB led to a statistically significant reduction in postanesthesia care unit opioid consumption (30.99 vs 26.45 mg, <em>P</em> = .039), although this difference was not deemed clinically significant. Additionally, the ACB + LIA group experienced a significantly longer mean time to discharge (495 ± 113 minutes) compared to the LIA-only group (463 ± 116 minutes; <em>P</em> = .017).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that adding ACB to LIA does not provide additional opioid-sparing benefits in ACL reconstruction, except in patients with hamstring grafts, where the difference observed may not be of clinical significance. The increased discharge time with ACB highlights the need to balance benefits with operational efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective matched comparative case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"Pages 3382-3389"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074980632500060X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This propensity-matched cohort study aimed to determine if adding adductor canal block (ACB) to local infiltration analgesia (LIA) reduces immediate postoperative opioid use in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and assess variations based on graft type.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed ACL reconstructions performed from 2019 to 2021. Patients were included if they received either LIA alone or a combination of LIA and ACB. Patients were propensity-matched based on demographic and surgical factors, and perioperative opioid consumption was assessed. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on autograft type (hamstring, quadriceps tendon, and bone–patellar tendon–bone).

Results

No significant differences were observed in intraoperative, postanesthesia care unit, or total perioperative opioid consumption between the ACB + LIA group (27.76 ± 14.01 mg) and the LIA-only group (28.58 ± 12.56 mg). This finding was consistent across all autograft types. However, in the hamstring autograft subgroup, the addition of ACB led to a statistically significant reduction in postanesthesia care unit opioid consumption (30.99 vs 26.45 mg, P = .039), although this difference was not deemed clinically significant. Additionally, the ACB + LIA group experienced a significantly longer mean time to discharge (495 ± 113 minutes) compared to the LIA-only group (463 ± 116 minutes; P = .017).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that adding ACB to LIA does not provide additional opioid-sparing benefits in ACL reconstruction, except in patients with hamstring grafts, where the difference observed may not be of clinical significance. The increased discharge time with ACB highlights the need to balance benefits with operational efficiency.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective matched comparative case series.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内收管阻滞局部浸润镇痛不能减少ACL手术后阿片类药物的使用。
目的:本倾向匹配队列研究旨在确定在局部浸润镇痛(LIA)中加入内收管阻滞(ACB)是否会减少ACL重建术后立即使用阿片类药物,并评估基于移植物类型的变化。方法:本回顾性研究分析2019年至2021年进行的ACL重建。如果患者单独接受LIA或LIA和ACB的联合治疗,则纳入患者。根据人口统计学和手术因素对患者进行倾向匹配,并评估围手术期阿片类药物的消耗。根据自体移植物类型(腘绳肌、股四头肌肌腱和髌骨-肌腱-骨)进行亚组分析。结果:ACB + LIA组(27.76±14.01 mg)与单独LIA组(28.58±12.56 mg)在术中、麻醉后护理单位(PACU)或围手术期总阿片类药物消耗量均无显著差异。这一发现在所有自体移植物类型中都是一致的。然而,在腘绳肌自体移植物亚组中,ACB的加入导致PACU阿片类药物消耗有统计学意义的减少(30.99 vs. 26.45 mg, p = 0.039),尽管这种差异不被认为具有临床意义。此外,ACB + LIA组的平均放电时间(495±113分钟)明显高于LIA组(463±116分钟);P = 0.017)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在前交叉韧带重建中,将ACB加入LIA并不能提供额外的阿片类药物节约益处,除了腿筋移植患者,在这种情况下观察到的差异可能没有临床意义。ACB增加的排放时间凸显了平衡效益与作业效率的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Commentary: Focus on Quadrupled Grafts With a Thick Anteromedial Bundle in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts to Improve Graft Survival: Could We Define a Target Graft Diameter? Increased Graft Diameter and Quadrupled Versus Tripled Hamstring Tendon Autograft are Associated With Improved Graft Survival in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Older Age, Female Sex, Chronic Injury, and Higher Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Scores Predict the Failure to Achieve the Maximal Outcome Improvement Thresholds Anchored by Patients' Willingness to Undergo Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Editorial Commentary: All-Arthroscopic Autologous Cancellous Bone Transplantation for Hepple V Cystic Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus-High Impact With Lower Level Evidence. All-Arthroscopic Autologous Cancellous Bone Transplantation Achieves Favorable Functional Improvements and Radiographic Recovery in Large Cystic Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus at a Minimum 12-Month Follow-Up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1