High Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography for Labral Tears, Rotator Cuff Tears, Hill-Sachs Lesions, and Bankart Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Menna Elbadry, Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil, Ruaa Mustafa Qafesha, Asem Ahmed Ghalwash, Hosny Elkhawaga, Amro Mamdouh Abdelrehim, Doaa Mashaly, Hatem Eldeeb, Mostafa Mahmoud Naguib, Yousef Ahmed Yousef Selim
{"title":"High Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography for Labral Tears, Rotator Cuff Tears, Hill-Sachs Lesions, and Bankart Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Menna Elbadry, Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil, Ruaa Mustafa Qafesha, Asem Ahmed Ghalwash, Hosny Elkhawaga, Amro Mamdouh Abdelrehim, Doaa Mashaly, Hatem Eldeeb, Mostafa Mahmoud Naguib, Yousef Ahmed Yousef Selim","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in different shoulder lesions using arthroscopy as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for articles that reported the diagnostic value of MRA in diagnosing labral tears, rotator cuff tears (RCTs), Hill-Sachs, and Bankart injuries. We used arthroscopic surgery as a reference standard for comparison. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. We pooled the collected data and used Stata/MP17 to generate summary statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 53 articles compromising 5,487 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for Hill-Sachs lesions were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.99) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.77-0.95), Bankart lesions were 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.97) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.90-1.00), anterior labral tears were 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-0.96) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-0.99), posterior labral tears were 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.86) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.86-1.00), superior labral tears were 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.88) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.54-0.95), SLAP lesions were 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.90) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.83-0.96), partial-thickness RCTs were 0.67 (95% CI 0.45-0.83) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.78-0.97), whereas full-thickness RCTs were 0.97 (95% CI 0.91-0.99) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.93-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, MRA is a sensitive and specific imaging method for identifying anterior labrum lesions, full-thickness RCTs, Bankart, SLAP, and Hill-Sachs lesions, with lower accuracy in partial-thickness RCTs, both posterior and superior labrum.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective cohort and case-control studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in different shoulder lesions using arthroscopy as gold standard.
Methods: We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for articles that reported the diagnostic value of MRA in diagnosing labral tears, rotator cuff tears (RCTs), Hill-Sachs, and Bankart injuries. We used arthroscopic surgery as a reference standard for comparison. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. We pooled the collected data and used Stata/MP17 to generate summary statistics.
Results: We identified a total of 53 articles compromising 5,487 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for Hill-Sachs lesions were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.99) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.77-0.95), Bankart lesions were 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.97) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.90-1.00), anterior labral tears were 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-0.96) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-0.99), posterior labral tears were 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.86) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.86-1.00), superior labral tears were 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.88) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.54-0.95), SLAP lesions were 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.90) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.83-0.96), partial-thickness RCTs were 0.67 (95% CI 0.45-0.83) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.78-0.97), whereas full-thickness RCTs were 0.97 (95% CI 0.91-0.99) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.93-1).
Conclusions: In conclusion, MRA is a sensitive and specific imaging method for identifying anterior labrum lesions, full-thickness RCTs, Bankart, SLAP, and Hill-Sachs lesions, with lower accuracy in partial-thickness RCTs, both posterior and superior labrum.
Level of evidence: Level III, meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective cohort and case-control studies.
期刊介绍：
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
