Intra-articular Stromal Vascular Fraction and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections Show Variable Efficacy and Higher Potential Complications Compared to Corticosteroid and Hyaluronic Acid in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Joo Hyung Han M.D. , Min Jung M.D., Ph.D. , Kwangho Chung M.D. , Hyun-Soo Moon M.D., Ph.D. , Se-Han Jung M.D. , Junwoo Byun M.D. , Sung-Hwan Kim M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"Intra-articular Stromal Vascular Fraction and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections Show Variable Efficacy and Higher Potential Complications Compared to Corticosteroid and Hyaluronic Acid in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Joo Hyung Han M.D. ,&nbsp;Min Jung M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Kwangho Chung M.D. ,&nbsp;Hyun-Soo Moon M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Se-Han Jung M.D. ,&nbsp;Junwoo Byun M.D. ,&nbsp;Sung-Hwan Kim M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div><span>To evaluate the clinical outcomes of intra-articular stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ASC) injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis through a meta-analysis of </span>randomized clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span><span>PubMed, </span>Embase, the </span>Cochrane Library<span><span>, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify Level I studies that compared the clinical efficacy of SVF or ASC with that of other nonoperative treatments. Clinical scores measured 3, 6, and 12 months postinjection were standardized to pain and functional scales for meta-analysis based on </span>minimal clinically important differences. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging findings and safety-related data were also investigated.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine studies involving 671 patients were included. SVF demonstrated superior pain and function score improvements compared to saline or hyaluronic acid<span> (HA) at 3, 6, and 12 months postinjection. However, SVF was inferior to corticosteroid at 3 months, showed no difference at 6 months, and was comparable or slightly superior at 12 months. ASC consistently showed better pain and function score improvements compared to saline and conservative treatment at all time points, with no significant differences observed compared to HA. High heterogeneity was noted in SVF function score results, requiring cautious interpretation. No serious adverse events<span> related to SVF or ASC were reported, although complications associated with liposuction were observed.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SVF showed consistent superiority in pain and function scores compared to HA and saline but not corticosteroids, except for the 3-month function score. ASC improved pain and function scores compared to saline and conservative treatment but was not superior to HA. While SVF and ASC significantly improved clinical scores, the potential complications from liposuction limit their ability to replace existing minimally invasive treatments<span> for knee osteoarthritis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level I, meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"Pages 3666-3680.e13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325000684","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of intra-articular stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ASC) injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis through a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify Level I studies that compared the clinical efficacy of SVF or ASC with that of other nonoperative treatments. Clinical scores measured 3, 6, and 12 months postinjection were standardized to pain and functional scales for meta-analysis based on minimal clinically important differences. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging findings and safety-related data were also investigated.

Results

Nine studies involving 671 patients were included. SVF demonstrated superior pain and function score improvements compared to saline or hyaluronic acid (HA) at 3, 6, and 12 months postinjection. However, SVF was inferior to corticosteroid at 3 months, showed no difference at 6 months, and was comparable or slightly superior at 12 months. ASC consistently showed better pain and function score improvements compared to saline and conservative treatment at all time points, with no significant differences observed compared to HA. High heterogeneity was noted in SVF function score results, requiring cautious interpretation. No serious adverse events related to SVF or ASC were reported, although complications associated with liposuction were observed.

Conclusions

SVF showed consistent superiority in pain and function scores compared to HA and saline but not corticosteroids, except for the 3-month function score. ASC improved pain and function scores compared to saline and conservative treatment but was not superior to HA. While SVF and ASC significantly improved clinical scores, the potential complications from liposuction limit their ability to replace existing minimally invasive treatments for knee osteoarthritis.

Level of Evidence

Level I, meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与皮质类固醇和透明质酸相比,关节内基质血管碎片和间充质干细胞注射在治疗膝骨性关节炎方面显示出不同的疗效和更高的潜在并发症:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
目的:本研究旨在通过随机临床试验的荟萃分析,评估关节内基质血管分数(SVF)和脂肪源性间充质干细胞(ASC)注射治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)患者的临床结果。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar,以确定将SVF或ASC与其他非手术治疗的临床疗效进行比较的I级研究。注射后3、6和12个月的临床评分标准化为疼痛和功能量表,以最小临床重要差异为基础进行meta分析。随访MRI结果和安全性相关数据也进行了调查。结果:纳入9项研究,涉及671例患者。与生理盐水或透明质酸(HA)相比,SVF在注射后3、6和12个月表现出更好的疼痛和功能评分改善。然而,SVF在3个月时低于皮质类固醇,在6个月时没有差异,在12个月时相当或略优于皮质类固醇。与生理盐水和保守治疗相比,ASC在所有时间点均表现出更好的疼痛和功能评分改善,与HA相比无显著差异。SVF功能评分结果存在高度异质性,需要谨慎解释。虽然观察到与抽脂相关的并发症,但没有报道与SVF或ASC相关的严重不良事件。结论:除了3个月的功能评分外,SVF在疼痛和功能评分上与HA和生理盐水相比具有一致的优势,而与皮质类固醇相比则没有。与生理盐水和保守治疗相比,ASC改善了疼痛和功能评分,但并不优于HA。虽然SVF和ASC显著提高了临床评分,但吸脂术的潜在并发症限制了它们替代现有膝关节OA微创治疗的能力。证据水平:1,随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Instructions for Authors Announcements Masthead Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1