A Pilot Study: Evaluating Disposable Syringes Compared to Non-Disposable Syringes for Dental Training

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Dental Education Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1002/jdd.13847
Robert Glickman, Tara Byrd, Marci H. Levine, Gene Sherwin, Elizabeth McAlpin, Colleen Watson, Aaron Soeprono, Chrystalla Orthodoxou, Yvelande Couamin
{"title":"A Pilot Study: Evaluating Disposable Syringes Compared to Non-Disposable Syringes for Dental Training","authors":"Robert Glickman,&nbsp;Tara Byrd,&nbsp;Marci H. Levine,&nbsp;Gene Sherwin,&nbsp;Elizabeth McAlpin,&nbsp;Colleen Watson,&nbsp;Aaron Soeprono,&nbsp;Chrystalla Orthodoxou,&nbsp;Yvelande Couamin","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Needlestick exposures commonly occur with non-disposable metal syringes during the assembly and disassembly of needles due to the manual handling of needles. Disposable syringes are designed to reduce these exposures by using a protective sheath thus eliminating the need to handle needles while uncapping and recapping them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study compared the two syringes with two alternating groups of third-year (D3) students during clinical practice under faculty supervision to administer local anesthesia to live patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In 2023, two groups of Year 3 (D3) Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) students supervised by faculty in each group alternated over two 4-week sessions using disposable (<i>N</i> = 67) and non-disposable (<i>N</i> = 66) syringes to administer local anesthesia injections to live patients. At the end of each session, each group and supervising faculty completed a survey to capture their experience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>While two participants reported needlestick injuries using non-disposable syringes and no injuries incurred using disposable syringes, we found neither a statistically significant increase nor decrease in exposures related to needlesticks using either syringe. Statistically significant outcomes showed that the participants found the non-disposable easier to use and they were more likely to use it going forward than the disposable syringe. Participants preferred using the non-disposable syringe mainly because of the stability and familiarity aspects of prior education. The disposable syringe, while easier and safer to assemble and disassemble, felt less stable to use during the injection procedure, especially during aspiration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While safety continues to be a concern, students and faculty prefer non-disposable metal syringes over disposable syringes. Most dissatisfaction with using the disposable syringe came from the aspiration system. But prior experience and comfort using non-disposable metal syringes, a lack of experience and confidence with local anesthesia procedures and a lack of experience with disposable syringes, may have contributed to these outcomes. Despite usability issues with the disposable syringe, performance was more impacted by lack of experience than the type of syringe used. Introducing both syringes early into the curriculum may help overcome usability factors, further reduce needlestick exposures, and prepare students for different workplace environments. Providing adequate training for faculty, especially on the differences between the two syringes, such as aspiration, will help alleviate discomfort and better promote the use of both.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":"89 9","pages":"1335-1344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jdd.13847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Needlestick exposures commonly occur with non-disposable metal syringes during the assembly and disassembly of needles due to the manual handling of needles. Disposable syringes are designed to reduce these exposures by using a protective sheath thus eliminating the need to handle needles while uncapping and recapping them.

Purpose

This pilot study compared the two syringes with two alternating groups of third-year (D3) students during clinical practice under faculty supervision to administer local anesthesia to live patients.

Methods

In 2023, two groups of Year 3 (D3) Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) students supervised by faculty in each group alternated over two 4-week sessions using disposable (N = 67) and non-disposable (N = 66) syringes to administer local anesthesia injections to live patients. At the end of each session, each group and supervising faculty completed a survey to capture their experience.

Results

While two participants reported needlestick injuries using non-disposable syringes and no injuries incurred using disposable syringes, we found neither a statistically significant increase nor decrease in exposures related to needlesticks using either syringe. Statistically significant outcomes showed that the participants found the non-disposable easier to use and they were more likely to use it going forward than the disposable syringe. Participants preferred using the non-disposable syringe mainly because of the stability and familiarity aspects of prior education. The disposable syringe, while easier and safer to assemble and disassemble, felt less stable to use during the injection procedure, especially during aspiration.

Conclusion

While safety continues to be a concern, students and faculty prefer non-disposable metal syringes over disposable syringes. Most dissatisfaction with using the disposable syringe came from the aspiration system. But prior experience and comfort using non-disposable metal syringes, a lack of experience and confidence with local anesthesia procedures and a lack of experience with disposable syringes, may have contributed to these outcomes. Despite usability issues with the disposable syringe, performance was more impacted by lack of experience than the type of syringe used. Introducing both syringes early into the curriculum may help overcome usability factors, further reduce needlestick exposures, and prepare students for different workplace environments. Providing adequate training for faculty, especially on the differences between the two syringes, such as aspiration, will help alleviate discomfort and better promote the use of both.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项初步研究:评估一次性注射器与非一次性注射器在牙科培训中的比较。
背景:由于手工操作针头,针头暴露通常发生在非一次性金属注射器的针头组装和拆卸过程中。一次性注射器的设计是通过使用保护套来减少这些暴露,从而消除了在打开和重新盖上针头时处理针头的需要。目的:本初步研究比较了三年级(D3)学生在教师监督下的临床实践中对活体患者进行局部麻醉的两组交替使用的两种注射器。方法:在2023年,两组三年级(D3)牙科医生(DDS)的学生在每组教师的监督下,轮流使用一次性(N = 67)和非一次性(N = 66)注射器对活体患者进行局部麻醉注射,为期4周。在每次课程结束时,每个小组和指导教师完成一项调查,以记录他们的经验。结果:虽然两名参与者报告了使用非一次性注射器的针头伤害,而使用一次性注射器的针头伤害没有发生,但我们发现使用两种注射器的针头暴露既没有统计学上的显著增加,也没有统计学上的显著减少。统计上显著的结果表明,参与者发现非一次性注射器更容易使用,他们更有可能使用它而不是一次性注射器。参与者更喜欢使用非一次性注射器,主要是因为先前教育的稳定性和熟悉性。一次性注射器虽然更容易和更安全的组装和拆卸,但在注射过程中,特别是在抽吸过程中,使用时感觉不太稳定。结论:虽然安全性仍然是一个问题,但学生和教师更喜欢非一次性金属注射器而不是一次性注射器。使用一次性注射器的最不满意来自抽吸系统。但先前使用非一次性金属注射器的经验和舒适度,对局部麻醉程序缺乏经验和信心,以及缺乏使用一次性注射器的经验,可能是导致这些结果的原因。尽管一次性注射器存在可用性问题,但与使用的注射器类型相比,缺乏经验对性能的影响更大。尽早在课程中引入这两种注射器可能有助于克服可用性因素,进一步减少针头接触,并为学生适应不同的工作环境做好准备。为教师提供充分的培训,特别是关于两种注射器之间的差异,例如抽吸,将有助于减轻不适并更好地促进两者的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
期刊最新文献
AI-Driven Preclinical Endodontic Simulation and Active Learning Strategies for Competency Development in Undergraduate Dental Education. Effect of Student-Centered Rubrics on the Quality Evaluation of a Pediatric Dentistry Course: A Pre-Post Quasi-Experiment With Independent Cohorts. Effectiveness of a Standardized Protocol in Teaching Indirect Crown Preparation for CAD/CAM Restorations. Assessment of Dental Students' Diagnostic and Management Decision-Making Skills in Temporomandibular Disorders Through Virtual Scenarios. Short-Term Survival Analysis of Resin-Composite Restorations by Dental Students Using Real-World Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1