Ankle supports enhance only psychological aspects of the Ankle-GO score in patients with chronic ankle instability.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Athletic Training Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0584.24
Brice Picot, François Fourchet, William Laydevant, Camille Louis, Gauthier Rauline, Alain Meyer, Leslie Podlog, Ronny Lopes, Alexandre Hardy
{"title":"Ankle supports enhance only psychological aspects of the Ankle-GO score in patients with chronic ankle instability.","authors":"Brice Picot, François Fourchet, William Laydevant, Camille Louis, Gauthier Rauline, Alain Meyer, Leslie Podlog, Ronny Lopes, Alexandre Hardy","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0584.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CONTEXT: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is the most serious long-term complication following an ankle sprain. Taping and bracing are frequently employed in the return to sport (RTS) continuum to avoid injury recurrence and to maximize post-injury performance. The Ankle-GO score is a valid and reliable objective RTS criteria, but the influence of ankle supports on this score in CAI patients remains unknown.OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the induce effects of taping or bracing on the Ankle-GO score among patients suffering from CAI.DESIGN: Crossover StudySETTING: Sports medicine research laboratoryPATIENTS: Thirty CAI patients (13 males and 17 females, 33.4 ±11.7 years) performed the Ankle-GO score in three conditions (taping, bracing and no ankle support).MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Ankle-GO is a 25-point score clustering 2 self-reported questionnaires (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury) and 4 functional tests (Single Leg Stance, Star Excursion Balance Test, Side Hop Test and Figure-of-eight test). Performances on each component as well as the total score were compared between conditions using repeated measures of ANOVA.RESULTS: Taping and bracing significantly and equally improved the Ankle-GO score compared with no support (12.8 ±5.3 and 11.2 ±4.2 vs. 8 ±4.5 points respectively, P<.001). However, significant improvements were found solely in self-reported questionnaires with ankle support (P<.001). No differences were found in functional tests, although both taping and bracing significantly lowered instability perception during the tests (+1.9 and +1.8 points, respectively).CONCLUSION: Ankle-GO scores were significantly enhanced with taping or bracing. However, only self-reported function and psychological readiness were improved. Functional performance was not altered, although external supports enhanced perceived stability. Both taping and bracing supports appear equally important in improving self-confidence and perceived ankle stability among individuals with CAI returning to sport.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0584.24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is the most serious long-term complication following an ankle sprain. Taping and bracing are frequently employed in the return to sport (RTS) continuum to avoid injury recurrence and to maximize post-injury performance. The Ankle-GO score is a valid and reliable objective RTS criteria, but the influence of ankle supports on this score in CAI patients remains unknown.OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the induce effects of taping or bracing on the Ankle-GO score among patients suffering from CAI.DESIGN: Crossover StudySETTING: Sports medicine research laboratoryPATIENTS: Thirty CAI patients (13 males and 17 females, 33.4 ±11.7 years) performed the Ankle-GO score in three conditions (taping, bracing and no ankle support).MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Ankle-GO is a 25-point score clustering 2 self-reported questionnaires (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury) and 4 functional tests (Single Leg Stance, Star Excursion Balance Test, Side Hop Test and Figure-of-eight test). Performances on each component as well as the total score were compared between conditions using repeated measures of ANOVA.RESULTS: Taping and bracing significantly and equally improved the Ankle-GO score compared with no support (12.8 ±5.3 and 11.2 ±4.2 vs. 8 ±4.5 points respectively, P<.001). However, significant improvements were found solely in self-reported questionnaires with ankle support (P<.001). No differences were found in functional tests, although both taping and bracing significantly lowered instability perception during the tests (+1.9 and +1.8 points, respectively).CONCLUSION: Ankle-GO scores were significantly enhanced with taping or bracing. However, only self-reported function and psychological readiness were improved. Functional performance was not altered, although external supports enhanced perceived stability. Both taping and bracing supports appear equally important in improving self-confidence and perceived ankle stability among individuals with CAI returning to sport.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在慢性踝关节不稳定的患者中,踝关节支持只增强踝关节go评分的心理方面。
背景:慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)是踝关节扭伤后最严重的长期并发症。绑带和支具经常用于恢复运动(RTS)连续体,以避免损伤复发和最大限度地提高伤后表现。踝关节go评分是一种有效可靠的客观RTS标准,但踝关节支撑对CAI患者该评分的影响尚不清楚。目的:我们的目的是评估胶带或支具对CAI患者踝关节go评分的诱导作用。设计:交叉研究设置:运动医学研究实验室患者:30例CAI患者(男性13例,女性17例,年龄33.4±11.7岁)在三种情况(绑带、支具和无踝关节支撑)下进行ankle - go评分。主要结果测量:踝关节go是一个25分的分数聚类2个自我报告问卷(足和踝关节能力测量和踝关节韧带重建-损伤后恢复运动)和4个功能测试(单腿站立,星形偏移平衡测试,侧跳测试和八字形测试)。各成分的表现以及总得分在不同条件下使用重复测量的方差分析进行比较。结果:与无支架组相比,带带和支具组均显著提高了踝关节go评分(分别为12.8±5.3分和11.2±4.2分)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
期刊最新文献
Trends in Weight Management Among State-Qualifying High School Wrestlers: Implications for Athletes, Clinicians, and Policy Development. Inflammatory Conditions in National Collegiate Athletic Association Women's Sports: 2009-2010 Through 2018-2019. The Association of Bone Stress Injuries With Body Mass Index Percentile Drop and Eating Disorder Diagnoses in Adolescent Athletes. A Fully Virtual Graded Exertion Test Is Safe and Feasible in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Children With Concussion. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Incidence Across Sex, Sport, and Competition Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1