Features and effectiveness of electronic audit and feedback for patient safety and quality of care in hospitals: A systematic review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/14604582251315414
James Soresi, Christina Bertilone, Eileen Banks, Theresa Marshall, Kevin Murray, David B Preen
{"title":"Features and effectiveness of electronic audit and feedback for patient safety and quality of care in hospitals: A systematic review.","authors":"James Soresi, Christina Bertilone, Eileen Banks, Theresa Marshall, Kevin Murray, David B Preen","doi":"10.1177/14604582251315414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Increasing digitisation in healthcare is flowing through to quality improvement strategies, like audit and feedback. <b>Objectives:</b> To systematically review electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) interventions in hospital settings, examining contemporary practices and quantitatively assessing the relationship between features and effectiveness. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a systematic review using a structured search strategy from 2011 to July 2022. Searches yielded a total of 5095 unique publications, with 152 included in a descriptive synthesis, reporting publication characteristics and practices, and 63 in the quantitative synthesis, to evaluate the effect size of intervention features. <b>Results:</b> The search returned publications across characteristics, including countries of origin, feedback topics, target health professionals, and study design types. We also identified an association with effectiveness for all but one of the features examined, with a Cohen's <i>d</i> ranging from above +0.8 (a large positive effect), to -0.67 (a medium negative effect). Socio-technical features related to supportive organisations and the involvement of engaged health professionals were most associated with effective interventions. <b>Conclusion:</b> Key findings have confirmed that a common set of features of e-A&F systems can influence effectiveness. Results provide practitioners with insight into where resources should be focused during the implementation of e-A&F.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"14604582251315414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251315414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing digitisation in healthcare is flowing through to quality improvement strategies, like audit and feedback. Objectives: To systematically review electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) interventions in hospital settings, examining contemporary practices and quantitatively assessing the relationship between features and effectiveness. Methods: We performed a systematic review using a structured search strategy from 2011 to July 2022. Searches yielded a total of 5095 unique publications, with 152 included in a descriptive synthesis, reporting publication characteristics and practices, and 63 in the quantitative synthesis, to evaluate the effect size of intervention features. Results: The search returned publications across characteristics, including countries of origin, feedback topics, target health professionals, and study design types. We also identified an association with effectiveness for all but one of the features examined, with a Cohen's d ranging from above +0.8 (a large positive effect), to -0.67 (a medium negative effect). Socio-technical features related to supportive organisations and the involvement of engaged health professionals were most associated with effective interventions. Conclusion: Key findings have confirmed that a common set of features of e-A&F systems can influence effectiveness. Results provide practitioners with insight into where resources should be focused during the implementation of e-A&F.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
期刊最新文献
Researching public health datasets in the era of deep learning: a systematic literature review. A blueprint for large language model-augmented telehealth for HIV mitigation in Indonesia: A scoping review of a novel therapeutic modality. Advancing African American and hispanic health literacy with a bilingual, personalized, prevention smartphone application. Evaluating the quality of Spanish-language information for patients with type 2 diabetes on YouTube and Facebook. Pathways to usage intention of mobile health apps among hypertensive patients: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1