No Significant Differences in Clinical Outcomes Were Observed Between Healed and Unhealed Hip Joint Capsules in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome After Arthroscopy

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.035
Lin-Yi Shen M.M. , Li Sun M.M. , Wei-Xing Li M.M. , Qian-Ru Li Ph.D. , Yi-Xin Wen M.M. , Yi-Wen Hu Ph.D. , Yang Sun Ph.D. , Ji-Wu Chen M.D., Ph.D. , Hong-Yun Li M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"No Significant Differences in Clinical Outcomes Were Observed Between Healed and Unhealed Hip Joint Capsules in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome After Arthroscopy","authors":"Lin-Yi Shen M.M. ,&nbsp;Li Sun M.M. ,&nbsp;Wei-Xing Li M.M. ,&nbsp;Qian-Ru Li Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Yi-Xin Wen M.M. ,&nbsp;Yi-Wen Hu Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Yang Sun Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Ji-Wu Chen M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Hong-Yun Li M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore the healing status of interportal capsulotomies<span><span> without repair after arthroscopy in patients with </span>femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and to examine its correlation with clinical outcomes, including the relationship with age and sex subgroups.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span><span><span>Data collected between August 2015 and January 2022 were reviewed. Patients with FAIS aged 18 to 65 years who underwent hip arthroscopy with interportal capsulotomies without repair with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patients with a lateral center-edge angle of less than 25°, Tönnis grade greater than 1, </span>Perthes disease, slipped upper femoral </span>epiphysis<span>, avascular necrosis, prior ipsilateral hip injury or surgery, and </span></span>absence<span><span> of magnetic resonance imaging at final follow-up were excluded. Patients were divided into healed and unhealed capsule groups according to magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. The primary patient-reported outcome (PRO) was the modified Harris Hip Score<span> (mHHS). The secondary PROs were the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living subscale, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific subscale, University of California at Los Angeles score, and visual analog scale pain score at final follow-up. The percentages of patients achieving the </span></span>minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the PROs were also calculated.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort comprised 69 patients (72 hips), with 28 hips (38.89%) in the unhealed capsule group and 44 hips (61.11%) in the healed capsule group. The cohort comprised 32 male and 37 female patients, and the mean age of the patients was 44.15 years. Within each group, there were significant preoperative-to-postoperative increases in the mHHS, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific subscale, and University of California at Los Angeles score and decreases in the visual analog scale pain score (all <em>P</em> &lt; .001). There were no significant differences between the healed and unhealed groups in the PROs and the achievement rates of the MCID and PASS (all <em>P</em> &gt; .05). In addition, compared with the healed group, the unhealed group showed worse mHHS values in patients older than 40 years (<em>P</em> = .003) and female patients (<em>P</em> = .036) on subgroup analysis by age and sex, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>At a minimum 2-year follow-up, 38.89% of patients with FAIS who underwent arthroscopic surgery with interportal capsulotomy without repair had unhealed hip capsules. There were no significant differences in PROs or achievement rates of the MCID and PASS between the healed and unhealed groups. Subgroup analysis showed that age older than 40 years and female sex may be associated with worse efficacy in patients with unhealed capsules.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective case-control study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"Pages 3540-3552.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325000532","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the healing status of interportal capsulotomies without repair after arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and to examine its correlation with clinical outcomes, including the relationship with age and sex subgroups.

Methods

Data collected between August 2015 and January 2022 were reviewed. Patients with FAIS aged 18 to 65 years who underwent hip arthroscopy with interportal capsulotomies without repair with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patients with a lateral center-edge angle of less than 25°, Tönnis grade greater than 1, Perthes disease, slipped upper femoral epiphysis, avascular necrosis, prior ipsilateral hip injury or surgery, and absence of magnetic resonance imaging at final follow-up were excluded. Patients were divided into healed and unhealed capsule groups according to magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. The primary patient-reported outcome (PRO) was the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). The secondary PROs were the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living subscale, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific subscale, University of California at Los Angeles score, and visual analog scale pain score at final follow-up. The percentages of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the PROs were also calculated.

Results

The cohort comprised 69 patients (72 hips), with 28 hips (38.89%) in the unhealed capsule group and 44 hips (61.11%) in the healed capsule group. The cohort comprised 32 male and 37 female patients, and the mean age of the patients was 44.15 years. Within each group, there were significant preoperative-to-postoperative increases in the mHHS, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific subscale, and University of California at Los Angeles score and decreases in the visual analog scale pain score (all P < .001). There were no significant differences between the healed and unhealed groups in the PROs and the achievement rates of the MCID and PASS (all P > .05). In addition, compared with the healed group, the unhealed group showed worse mHHS values in patients older than 40 years (P = .003) and female patients (P = .036) on subgroup analysis by age and sex, respectively.

Conclusions

At a minimum 2-year follow-up, 38.89% of patients with FAIS who underwent arthroscopic surgery with interportal capsulotomy without repair had unhealed hip capsules. There were no significant differences in PROs or achievement rates of the MCID and PASS between the healed and unhealed groups. Subgroup analysis showed that age older than 40 years and female sex may be associated with worse efficacy in patients with unhealed capsules.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective case-control study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜术后愈合与未愈合髋关节胶囊的临床疗效无显著差异。
目的:探讨股髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)患者关节镜术后门静脉间囊切开不修复的愈合情况,并探讨其与临床结局的相关性,包括与年龄和性别亚组的关系。方法:回顾2015年8月至2022年1月收集的数据。年龄18-65岁的FAIS患者接受了至少2年的随访,并接受了髋关节镜和门间囊切开术。排除外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)小于25°、Tönnis分级大于1、Perthes病、股骨上端骨骺滑脱、缺血性坏死、既往同侧髋关节损伤或手术、最终随访时无磁共振成像(MRI)的患者。根据MRI评价将患者分为愈合组和未愈合组。主要的患者报告结果(PROs)是改良的Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)。次要PROs是髋关节结局评分-日常生活活动量表(HOS-ADL)、髋关节结局评分-运动特定子量表(HOS-SSS)、加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分和最终随访时疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)。同时计算达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的患者百分比。结果:69例患者(72髋),包膜未愈合组28例(38.89%),包膜愈合组44例(61.11%)。该队列包括32名男性和37名女性患者,这些患者的平均年龄为44.15岁。各组患者术后mHHS、HOS-ADL、HOS-SSS、UCLA评分均显著升高,疼痛VAS评分下降(均P < 0.001)。愈合组与未愈合组的PROs、MCID和PASS的完成率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与愈合组相比,40岁以上年龄组(P = 0.003)和女性组(P = 0.036)的mHHS均较愈合组差。结论:在至少2年的随访中,38.89%的FAIS患者接受关节镜手术合并门静脉间囊切开术而未修复的髋关节囊未愈合。愈合组与未愈合组的PROs、MCID完成率和PASS均无显著差异。亚组分析显示,年龄大于40岁、女性未愈合患者的疗效可能较差。研究设计:III级,回顾性病例对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Periportal and Puncture Capsulotomy Techniques Have Similar Outcomes to Traditional Capsulotomies With Closure in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 2-Year Outcomes. Chronicity of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Does Not Adversely Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Primary Repair in Appropriately Selected Patients. Editorial Commentary: Repair of Proximal Hamstring Injuries Leads to Good Outcomes in Most Patients, but Higher Level of Evidence Suggests We Might Not Need to Repair Them All in the First Place. Latarjet and Distal Tibia Allograft Provide Higher Functional Outcomes Than Soft Tissue Stabilization After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Competitive Athletes. Editorial Commentary: Estrogen Influences Shoulder Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1