Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation With Concomitant Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Improves Clinical Outcomes and Yields High Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review.

Melissa L Carpenter, Eric J Cotter, Juan Bernardo Villarreal-Espinosa, Samuel Alfonsi, Fernando Gómez-Verdejo, Cameron Gerhold, Udit Dave, Adam B Yanke, Brian J Cole, Jorge Chahla
{"title":"Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation With Concomitant Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Improves Clinical Outcomes and Yields High Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Melissa L Carpenter, Eric J Cotter, Juan Bernardo Villarreal-Espinosa, Samuel Alfonsi, Fernando Gómez-Verdejo, Cameron Gerhold, Udit Dave, Adam B Yanke, Brian J Cole, Jorge Chahla","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To conduct a systematic review evaluating subjective patient-reported outcomes, reoperations, and graft failure after concomitant osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation and meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed by querying the MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. The inclusion criteria were limited to peer-reviewed, English-language, Level I to IV studies with at least 10 patients that reported clinical outcomes and complications after OCA transplantation with concomitant MAT for osteochondral defects and meniscal deficiency with minimum 2-year follow-up. For most of the included studies, failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty, revision OCA, or graft failure on postoperative imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies with a total of 188 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 32.4 years (range, 15-66 years). Improvement in the following outcome scores was observed across all included studies from preoperatively to postoperatively: Lysholm knee score (+21 to +26.69); International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score (+19 to +26.55); Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale (+17.91 to +26), KOOS Symptom subscale (+9 to +18.16), KOOS Activities of Daily Living subscale (+11.91 to +23.4), KOOS Sport subscale (+19 to +26.04), KOOS Quality of Life subscale (+22 to +35.01), 12-Item Short Form Survey physical score (+5 to +12.26), and 12-Item Short Form Survey mental score (+1.8 to +4) (P < .05 for all). The reoperation rate was between 6.7% and 54%. The failure rate was between 13% and 22.9%. Although patient satisfaction data were only available in 2 studies, 82% to 90% of patients would choose to undergo OCA transplantation with MAT again.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OCA transplantation with concomitant MAT for the treatment of focal chondral defects in the presence of meniscal deficiency results in improved patient-reported outcome measures with high patient satisfaction rates. The mean reoperation rate and failure rate at a mean follow-up time of 4.7 years are 37.3% and 17.1%, respectively, which are expected and consistent with the existing literature on isolated procedures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review evaluating subjective patient-reported outcomes, reoperations, and graft failure after concomitant osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation and meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT).

Methods: A literature search was performed by querying the MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. The inclusion criteria were limited to peer-reviewed, English-language, Level I to IV studies with at least 10 patients that reported clinical outcomes and complications after OCA transplantation with concomitant MAT for osteochondral defects and meniscal deficiency with minimum 2-year follow-up. For most of the included studies, failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty, revision OCA, or graft failure on postoperative imaging.

Results: Six studies with a total of 188 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 32.4 years (range, 15-66 years). Improvement in the following outcome scores was observed across all included studies from preoperatively to postoperatively: Lysholm knee score (+21 to +26.69); International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score (+19 to +26.55); Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale (+17.91 to +26), KOOS Symptom subscale (+9 to +18.16), KOOS Activities of Daily Living subscale (+11.91 to +23.4), KOOS Sport subscale (+19 to +26.04), KOOS Quality of Life subscale (+22 to +35.01), 12-Item Short Form Survey physical score (+5 to +12.26), and 12-Item Short Form Survey mental score (+1.8 to +4) (P < .05 for all). The reoperation rate was between 6.7% and 54%. The failure rate was between 13% and 22.9%. Although patient satisfaction data were only available in 2 studies, 82% to 90% of patients would choose to undergo OCA transplantation with MAT again.

Conclusions: OCA transplantation with concomitant MAT for the treatment of focal chondral defects in the presence of meniscal deficiency results in improved patient-reported outcome measures with high patient satisfaction rates. The mean reoperation rate and failure rate at a mean follow-up time of 4.7 years are 37.3% and 17.1%, respectively, which are expected and consistent with the existing literature on isolated procedures.

Level of evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
A Single Lateral Hinge Screw Increased Resistance to Varus Stress After Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in a Synthetic Bone Model: a Biomechanical Analysis. Author Reply to "Letter to the Editor Regarding 'One-Year Follow-up is Sufficient Time for Patient- Reported Outcomes following Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta- analysis'". Author reply to «Postoperative Immobilization Strategies Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Clinical and Sociological Perspective. ». Computer-Assisted Surgery Has Already Arrived in Sports Medicine, and Robots Are Next. Intraoperative periarticular injection may improve postoperative pain scores and reduce opioid consumption in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1