Quadratus Lumborum Block Provides Similar or Reduced Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption Compared to Control Following Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review

Muzammil Akhtar B.S. , Mustafa Jundi B.S. , Iqbal Khan B.S. , Sonia Aamer B.S. , Anand Dhaliwal M.D. , Lillian Jundi M.D. , Trevor Shelton M.D., M.S.
{"title":"Quadratus Lumborum Block Provides Similar or Reduced Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption Compared to Control Following Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review","authors":"Muzammil Akhtar B.S. ,&nbsp;Mustafa Jundi B.S. ,&nbsp;Iqbal Khan B.S. ,&nbsp;Sonia Aamer B.S. ,&nbsp;Anand Dhaliwal M.D. ,&nbsp;Lillian Jundi M.D. ,&nbsp;Trevor Shelton M.D., M.S.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate whether the quadratus lumborum (QL) block is associated with reduced postoperative pain<span> and opioid consumption in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases to identify comparative studies of patients undergoing the QL block before hip arthroscopy. The primary outcomes of interest included postoperative pain and opioid consumption.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight studies (5 randomized, 3 nonrandomized) with 274 patients receiving the QL block were included. Control groups included no block (3 studies), sham block (2 studies), pericapsular injection of anesthetic (1 study), lumbar plexus block (1 study), and femoral nerve/fascia iliaca block (1 study). In 1 randomized and 2 nonrandomized studies, the pain scores were significantly lower, at all postoperative time points, in the QL block versus sham, no block, and femoral nerve/fascia iliaca control groups. The same 3 studies reported significantly less opioid consumption in the QL group at all measured postoperative time points. The remaining 5 studies reported mostly no significant differences in pain scores and opioid consumption at multiple postoperative time points. In no study did the QL block group have significantly more pain or opioid consumption relative to the control groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared to a variety of control groups, the QL block provides similar or reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, systematic review of Level I and III studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"Pages 3789-3800"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325000593","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether the quadratus lumborum (QL) block is associated with reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

Methods

A search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases to identify comparative studies of patients undergoing the QL block before hip arthroscopy. The primary outcomes of interest included postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

Results

Eight studies (5 randomized, 3 nonrandomized) with 274 patients receiving the QL block were included. Control groups included no block (3 studies), sham block (2 studies), pericapsular injection of anesthetic (1 study), lumbar plexus block (1 study), and femoral nerve/fascia iliaca block (1 study). In 1 randomized and 2 nonrandomized studies, the pain scores were significantly lower, at all postoperative time points, in the QL block versus sham, no block, and femoral nerve/fascia iliaca control groups. The same 3 studies reported significantly less opioid consumption in the QL group at all measured postoperative time points. The remaining 5 studies reported mostly no significant differences in pain scores and opioid consumption at multiple postoperative time points. In no study did the QL block group have significantly more pain or opioid consumption relative to the control groups.

Conclusions

Compared to a variety of control groups, the QL block provides similar or reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review of Level I and III studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与对照组相比,腰方肌阻滞在髋关节镜术后提供相似或减少的术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗:一项系统综述。
目的:探讨腰方肌(QL)阻滞是否与髋关节镜术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗减少有关。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆数据库中搜索系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,以确定在髋关节镜检查前接受QL阻滞的患者的比较研究。主要结局包括术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗。结果:8项研究(5项随机,3项非随机)纳入274例接受QL阻滞的患者。对照组包括无阻滞(3项研究)、假阻滞(2项研究)、囊周麻醉注射(1项研究)、腰丛(LP)阻滞(1项研究)和股神经/髂筋膜(FN/FI)阻滞(1项研究)。在一项随机和两项非随机研究中,QL组与假手术组、无阻滞组和FN/FI对照组相比,在所有术后时间点疼痛评分均显著降低。同样的三项研究报告,在所有测量的术后时间点,QL组的阿片类药物消耗显著减少。其余5项研究报告在术后多个时间点疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗方面基本无显著差异。没有一项研究表明,与对照组相比,QL阻滞组有更多的疼痛或阿片类药物消耗。结论:与各种对照组相比,QL阻滞在减少髋关节镜患者术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗方面提供了类似的效果。证据等级:III级,对I级和III级研究进行系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Instructions for Authors Announcements Masthead Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1