Delineating empirically plausible causal pathways to suicidality among people at clinical high risk for psychosis.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of psychopathology and clinical science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1037/abn0000969
Michael V Bronstein, Erich Kummerfeld, Carrie E Bearden, Barbara A Cornblatt, Elaine F Walker, Scott W Woods, Daniel Mathalon, Diana Perkins, Kristen S Cadenhead, Jean Addington, Tyrone D Cannon, Sophia Vinogradov
{"title":"Delineating empirically plausible causal pathways to suicidality among people at clinical high risk for psychosis.","authors":"Michael V Bronstein, Erich Kummerfeld, Carrie E Bearden, Barbara A Cornblatt, Elaine F Walker, Scott W Woods, Daniel Mathalon, Diana Perkins, Kristen S Cadenhead, Jean Addington, Tyrone D Cannon, Sophia Vinogradov","doi":"10.1037/abn0000969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicidality is common among people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. Delineating causal pathways to suicidality and identifying its determinants would inform tailored intervention efforts for these individuals. To this end, we analyzed data on CHR samples from the second and third North American Prodrome Longitudinal Studies (NAPLS-2, <i>n</i> = 355; NAPLS-3, <i>n</i> = 266). Data on correlates of suicidality-including depression and attenuated psychosis symptoms, sleep, and childhood trauma-from two initial study timepoints were submitted to the greedy relaxations of the sparsest permutation algorithm. Intervention calculus was used to estimate the (lower bound) total empirically plausible causal effects of each variable on suicidality. Across both samples, greedy relaxations of the sparsest permutation suggested that symptoms of depression-particularly hopelessness, self-deprecation, and depressed mood-were likely direct causes of suicidality among people at CHR for psychosis. Across samples and measurement time points, intervention calculus indicated that depressed mood exerted the greatest influence over suicidality of all measured variables. This study provides data-driven, testable hypotheses about the causal pathways leading to suicidality among people at CHR for psychosis and suggests promising targets for interventions on suicidality tailored to these individuals. Future experimental research should test these hypotheses by, for example, comparing the suicide risk reduction afforded by interventions aimed at each aforementioned target. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":"239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicidality is common among people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. Delineating causal pathways to suicidality and identifying its determinants would inform tailored intervention efforts for these individuals. To this end, we analyzed data on CHR samples from the second and third North American Prodrome Longitudinal Studies (NAPLS-2, n = 355; NAPLS-3, n = 266). Data on correlates of suicidality-including depression and attenuated psychosis symptoms, sleep, and childhood trauma-from two initial study timepoints were submitted to the greedy relaxations of the sparsest permutation algorithm. Intervention calculus was used to estimate the (lower bound) total empirically plausible causal effects of each variable on suicidality. Across both samples, greedy relaxations of the sparsest permutation suggested that symptoms of depression-particularly hopelessness, self-deprecation, and depressed mood-were likely direct causes of suicidality among people at CHR for psychosis. Across samples and measurement time points, intervention calculus indicated that depressed mood exerted the greatest influence over suicidality of all measured variables. This study provides data-driven, testable hypotheses about the causal pathways leading to suicidality among people at CHR for psychosis and suggests promising targets for interventions on suicidality tailored to these individuals. Future experimental research should test these hypotheses by, for example, comparing the suicide risk reduction afforded by interventions aimed at each aforementioned target. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床精神病高风险人群中描述经验上可信的自杀因果途径。
自杀在精神病临床高危人群中很常见。描述自杀的因果途径并确定其决定因素将为这些个体提供量身定制的干预措施。为此,我们分析了第二次和第三次北美前驱期纵向研究(NAPLS-2, n = 355;NAPLS-3, n = 266)。来自两个初始研究时间点的自杀相关数据——包括抑郁和精神病症状减轻、睡眠和童年创伤——被提交给最稀疏排列算法的贪婪松弛。使用干预演算来估计每个变量对自杀的(下界)总经验似是而非的因果效应。在这两个样本中,最稀疏排列的贪婪松弛表明,抑郁症状——尤其是绝望、自谦和抑郁情绪——可能是CHR精神病患者自杀的直接原因。在样本和测量时间点上,干预演算表明抑郁情绪对所有测量变量的自杀行为影响最大。这项研究提供了数据驱动的、可测试的假设,关于导致CHR精神病患者自杀的因果途径,并为针对这些个体的自杀干预提出了有希望的目标。未来的实验研究应该测试这些假设,例如,通过比较针对上述每个目标的干预措施所提供的自杀风险降低。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variability is not flexibility: Emotion regulation switching predicts increased momentary distress when context is stable. Diagnosis and conceptualization of suicide: Why suicide belongs in dimensional frameworks of psychopathology. Supplemental Material for Variability Is Not Flexibility: Emotion Regulation Switching Predicts Increased Momentary Distress When Context Is Stable Divergent disinhibition profiles linked to externalizing psychopathology. Supplemental Material for Divergent Disinhibition Profiles Linked to Externalizing Psychopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1