Impact of fracture type on conversion to total hip arthroplasty following surgical repair of acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andrew P Collins, Sanjay Kubsad, Reza Firoozabadi
{"title":"Impact of fracture type on conversion to total hip arthroplasty following surgical repair of acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Andrew P Collins, Sanjay Kubsad, Reza Firoozabadi","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of risk factors of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) after operative fixation of acetabular fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data sources included PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, which were screened from inception to 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Inclusion criteria were studies comparing risk factors of conversion to THA following acetabular fracture (OTA/AO 62A, B, C) surgical fixation.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Studies were assessed by the risk of bias and methodologic quality of evidence tools designed by the Cochrane Methods Bias Group and Cochrane Statistical Methods Group.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Meta-analyses were conducted with a random-effects model using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 29.0.2.0. One-factor-at-a-time sensitivity analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies (1951 patients) were included. Based on the Judet and Letournel classification system, patients with associated fracture patterns were more likely to require conversion to THA than those with elementary patterns (risk ratio [RR] = 1.55, <i>P</i> = 0.013). Patients with posterior wall involvement (including posterior wall, posterior column with posterior wall, and transverse with posterior wall patterns) were more likely to require subsequent THA than those without posterior wall involvement (RR = 1.58, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients who presented with hip dislocation and acetabular dome impaction and comminution were at higher risk of THA (RR = 1.15 and 1.19, respectively; <i>P</i> < 0.001, both). Owing to heterogeneity in reported findings, there were insufficient data to assess the impact of the quality of reduction, restoration of the articular surface, time since acetabular fixation, and patient demographic factors on conversion to THA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study aids in the identification of patients who may require early THA for posttraumatic arthritis based on fracture and injury patterns at presentation. Acetabular fractures with posterior wall involvement and those with associated fracture patterns are associated with a higher rate of conversion to THA. Injuries with acetabular dome impaction and comminution and hip dislocation are also significantly associated with conversion to THA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"8 1","pages":"e374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of risk factors of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) after operative fixation of acetabular fractures.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data sources included PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, which were screened from inception to 2024.

Study selection: Inclusion criteria were studies comparing risk factors of conversion to THA following acetabular fracture (OTA/AO 62A, B, C) surgical fixation.

Data extraction: Studies were assessed by the risk of bias and methodologic quality of evidence tools designed by the Cochrane Methods Bias Group and Cochrane Statistical Methods Group.

Data synthesis: Meta-analyses were conducted with a random-effects model using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 29.0.2.0. One-factor-at-a-time sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results: Twelve studies (1951 patients) were included. Based on the Judet and Letournel classification system, patients with associated fracture patterns were more likely to require conversion to THA than those with elementary patterns (risk ratio [RR] = 1.55, P = 0.013). Patients with posterior wall involvement (including posterior wall, posterior column with posterior wall, and transverse with posterior wall patterns) were more likely to require subsequent THA than those without posterior wall involvement (RR = 1.58, P < 0.001). Patients who presented with hip dislocation and acetabular dome impaction and comminution were at higher risk of THA (RR = 1.15 and 1.19, respectively; P < 0.001, both). Owing to heterogeneity in reported findings, there were insufficient data to assess the impact of the quality of reduction, restoration of the articular surface, time since acetabular fixation, and patient demographic factors on conversion to THA.

Conclusions: This study aids in the identification of patients who may require early THA for posttraumatic arthritis based on fracture and injury patterns at presentation. Acetabular fractures with posterior wall involvement and those with associated fracture patterns are associated with a higher rate of conversion to THA. Injuries with acetabular dome impaction and comminution and hip dislocation are also significantly associated with conversion to THA.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋臼骨折手术修复后骨折类型对全髋关节置换术的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本研究的目的是对髋臼骨折手术固定后转全髋关节置换术(THA)的危险因素进行荟萃分析。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。数据来源包括PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE和Cochrane Library,从成立到2024年进行筛选。研究选择:纳入标准是比较髋臼骨折(OTA/AO 62A, B, C)手术固定后转THA危险因素的研究。资料提取:通过Cochrane方法偏倚组和Cochrane统计方法组设计的偏倚风险和证据工具的方法学质量对研究进行评估。数据综合:采用IBM SPSS Statistics Version 29.0.2.0采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。进行单因素一次敏感性分析。结果:纳入12项研究(1951例)。根据Judet和Letournel分类系统,合并骨折类型的患者比单纯骨折类型的患者更有可能需要转换为THA(风险比[RR] = 1.55, P = 0.013)。累及后壁(包括后壁、后柱伴后壁、横柱伴后壁)的患者比未累及后壁的患者更有可能需要后续THA (RR = 1.58, P < 0.001)。出现髋关节脱位、髋臼顶嵌塞和粉碎的患者发生THA的风险较高(RR分别为1.15和1.19;P均< 0.001)。由于报道结果的异质性,没有足够的数据来评估复位质量、关节面恢复、髋臼固定时间和患者人口统计学因素对THA转换的影响。结论:该研究有助于根据骨折和损伤表现确定可能需要早期THA治疗创伤后关节炎的患者。髋臼骨折累及后壁及相关骨折类型的髋臼骨折转化为全髋关节置换术的几率较高。髋臼顶嵌塞、粉碎和髋关节脱位的损伤也与THA转换显著相关。证据等级:三级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intramedullary nailing with absorbable antibiotic-eluting ceramic for fracture-related infection prophylaxis in high-risk open fractures: a case series and technique. Lower extremity osseointegration for amputees with diabetes mellitus and vascular disease. Treatment of high-energy lower extremity trauma is explained by the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Open Fracture Classification. Intramedullary nailing with an absorbable antibiotic bone graft substitute in fracture-related infections and osteomyelitis: a case series. The crest-pillar-column method for percutaneous fixation of the posterior column using a curved intramedullary device: surgical technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1