“Junior Doctors” in Nephrology in France: first feedback

Emmanuelle Vial, Mickael Bobot, Jean-Philippe Bertocchio, Charlotte Lohéac, Grégoire Bon, Mathilde Roussel, Paule Chaillet-Poirier, Valentin Maisons
{"title":"“Junior Doctors” in Nephrology in France: first feedback","authors":"Emmanuelle Vial, Mickael Bobot, Jean-Philippe Bertocchio, Charlotte Lohéac, Grégoire Bon, Mathilde Roussel, Paule Chaillet-Poirier, Valentin Maisons","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2024.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical education in France has undergone several major reforms in recent years. In 2017, the reform of the third cycle of medical studies was implemented. This particularly affected nephrology. The reform introduced a new status of “junior doctor”. Its main objective is to ensure the transition from intern to senior doctor.\nThe “Syndicat National des Internes de Néphrologie” (SNIN) conducted a survey to take stock of this new status in our specialty. The respondents were contacted through their city referents.\nWe received 53 completed questionnaires from Nephrology junior-doctors with an average age of 29 years from all over France. The choice of assignment was satisfactory in 93% of cases. The activity of these juniors-doctors was mainly oriented towards clinical nephrology or was mixed, with the possibility of own consultations for almost all residents. The on-call or nightshift activity of the junior-doctors was mainly concentrated in their home department, with only one third of them working as substitute. Their weekly working hours were substantial (mostly between 45 and 65 hours/week), with a significant number exceeding the legal limit. Overall, supervision was considered satisfactory. Very few residents had time for research or theorical-learning, although some gave lessons and received training mainly through conferences. Progress in performing renal biopsies was substantial, in contrast to central venous catheter placement and peritoneal dialysis management, where progress was judged to be weak.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"20 4","pages":"240-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2024.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical education in France has undergone several major reforms in recent years. In 2017, the reform of the third cycle of medical studies was implemented. This particularly affected nephrology. The reform introduced a new status of “junior doctor”. Its main objective is to ensure the transition from intern to senior doctor. The “Syndicat National des Internes de Néphrologie” (SNIN) conducted a survey to take stock of this new status in our specialty. The respondents were contacted through their city referents. We received 53 completed questionnaires from Nephrology junior-doctors with an average age of 29 years from all over France. The choice of assignment was satisfactory in 93% of cases. The activity of these juniors-doctors was mainly oriented towards clinical nephrology or was mixed, with the possibility of own consultations for almost all residents. The on-call or nightshift activity of the junior-doctors was mainly concentrated in their home department, with only one third of them working as substitute. Their weekly working hours were substantial (mostly between 45 and 65 hours/week), with a significant number exceeding the legal limit. Overall, supervision was considered satisfactory. Very few residents had time for research or theorical-learning, although some gave lessons and received training mainly through conferences. Progress in performing renal biopsies was substantial, in contrast to central venous catheter placement and peritoneal dialysis management, where progress was judged to be weak.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国肾内科“初级医生”:第一次反馈
近年来,法国的医学教育经历了几次重大改革。2017年,实施医学专业第三周期改革。这尤其影响到肾脏病学。改革引入了“初级医生”的新地位。其主要目标是确保从实习生到高级医生的过渡。“全国网络通讯协会”(SNIN)进行了一项调查,以评估我们专业的这种新状况。我们通过受访者所在城市的推荐人与他们取得联系。我们收到来自法国各地平均年龄为29岁的初级肾脏病医生的53份完整问卷。在93%的病例中,作业选择是令人满意的。这些初级医生的活动主要面向临床肾脏病学或混合,有可能为几乎所有居民提供自己的咨询。初级医生的随叫随到或夜班活动主要集中在本科,只有三分之一的初级医生从事替代工作。他们每周的工作时间很长(大多数在45至65小时/周之间),有相当一部分人超过了法定限制。总体而言,监管工作令人满意。很少有居民有时间进行研究或理论学习,尽管有些人主要通过会议授课和接受培训。与中心静脉置管和腹膜透析治疗相比,肾活检的进展是实质性的,而后者的进展被认为是微弱的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calcinosis cutis in a hemodialysis patient with Von Hippel-Lindau disease Evaluation of the relationship between the severity of interstitial fibrosis in diagnostic renal biopsies and disease progression in primary glomerular diseases Hemodialysis and VKAs: How INR self-monitoring and supervised administration during sessions improve anticoagulant treatment stability Challenges of ongoing VKA use in calciphylaxis: The potential of multimodal treatment including rheopheresis, — a case report Iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with chronic kidney disease: A review of international guidelines (SFNDT/SFR, ESUR, ACR/NKF, CAR)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1