The year 2025 confirms the transition of kidney transplantation toward a precision-medicine paradigm, marked by major advances in pathophysiology, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The study by Sablik et al. redefined the spectrum of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) by highlighting the prognostic importance of microvascular inflammation, even in the absence of DSA or C4d deposition. Circulating biomarkers (donor-derived cell-free DNA [dd-cfDNA] and transcriptomic signatures) are now established as key tools for detecting and monitoring rejection, while anti-CD38 antibodies and intravenous immunoglobulins open new therapeutic perspectives in chronic active ABMR. Antiviral immunomonitoring and virus-specific cellular therapies represent a decisive step toward targeted restoration of antiviral immunity, and SGLT2 inhibitors are emerging as cornerstone agents for cardio-renal protection. Advances in quantitative imaging enable non-invasive assessment of graft fibrosis. Finally, xenotransplantation has entered a phase of experimental validation, with the first detailed immunologic characterizations in humans. Together, these developments confirm the convergence of molecular, immunologic, and technological approaches toward truly individualized management of kidney-transplant recipients.
{"title":"What’s new in transplantation in 2025?","authors":"Manon Dekeyser","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2026.158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2026.158","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The year 2025 confirms the transition of kidney transplantation toward a precision-medicine paradigm, marked by major advances in pathophysiology, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The study by Sablik et al. redefined the spectrum of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) by highlighting the prognostic importance of microvascular inflammation, even in the absence of DSA or C4d deposition. Circulating biomarkers (donor-derived cell-free DNA [dd-cfDNA] and transcriptomic signatures) are now established as key tools for detecting and monitoring rejection, while anti-CD38 antibodies and intravenous immunoglobulins open new therapeutic perspectives in chronic active ABMR. Antiviral immunomonitoring and virus-specific cellular therapies represent a decisive step toward targeted restoration of antiviral immunity, and SGLT2 inhibitors are emerging as cornerstone agents for cardio-renal protection. Advances in quantitative imaging enable non-invasive assessment of graft fibrosis. Finally, xenotransplantation has entered a phase of experimental validation, with the first detailed immunologic characterizations in humans. Together, these developments confirm the convergence of molecular, immunologic, and technological approaches toward truly individualized management of kidney-transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"22 S1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"2025 Congress of the Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation (SFNDT): A magnificent edition concluded with an inspiring “What’s new?” session","authors":"Luc Frimat","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2026.159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2026.159","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"22 S1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cardiovascular mortality among hemodialysis patients remains strikingly high—around 10% per year—despite substantial advances in dialysis technology and medical care. Historically, several strategies extrapolated from the general population have failed to improve outcomes: The landmark 4D and AURORA trials showed no cardiovascular or survival benefit from statin therapy in dialysis patients, whereas high-volume online hemodiafiltration (ESHOL, CONVINCE) significantly reduced all-cause mortality, though without a specific reduction in cardiovascular deaths. More recently, large randomized controlled trials have again underscored the difficulty of improving cardiovascular outcomes in dialysis through pharmacological means: The ACHIEVE and ALCHEMIST trials found no clinical benefit from low-dose spironolactone on cardiovascular mortality or heart-failure hospitalization, and the DIALIZE-Outcomes trial showed that improved potassium control with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate did not reduce sudden cardiac death or arrhythmic events. Taken together, these neutral findings emphasize the complex, multifactorial nature of cardiovascular risk in dialysis, driven by “non-traditional” mechanisms such as inflammation, vascular calcification, oxidative stress, and intradialytic myocardial ischemia. In this context, recent studies from the Avignon group in France have identified intradialytic and pre-dialysis exercise as a promising non-pharmacological intervention capable of mitigating myocardial stunning and improving cardiac function. In summary, while classical cardioprotective strategies continue to fall short, emerging evidence highlights the potential of innovative, physiology-based approaches—optimizing dialysis modalities and leveraging exercise-induced cardioprotection—to address the persistent cardiovascular burden of uremia.
{"title":"What’s new in dialysis in 2025?","authors":"Nans Florens","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2026.156","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2026.156","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular mortality among hemodialysis patients remains strikingly high—around 10% per year—despite substantial advances in dialysis technology and medical care. Historically, several strategies extrapolated from the general population have failed to improve outcomes: The landmark 4D and AURORA trials showed no cardiovascular or survival benefit from statin therapy in dialysis patients, whereas high-volume online hemodiafiltration (ESHOL, CONVINCE) significantly reduced all-cause mortality, though without a specific reduction in cardiovascular deaths. More recently, large randomized controlled trials have again underscored the difficulty of improving cardiovascular outcomes in dialysis through pharmacological means: The ACHIEVE and ALCHEMIST trials found no clinical benefit from low-dose spironolactone on cardiovascular mortality or heart-failure hospitalization, and the DIALIZE-Outcomes trial showed that improved potassium control with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate did not reduce sudden cardiac death or arrhythmic events. Taken together, these neutral findings emphasize the complex, multifactorial nature of cardiovascular risk in dialysis, driven by “non-traditional” mechanisms such as inflammation, vascular calcification, oxidative stress, and intradialytic myocardial ischemia. In this context, recent studies from the Avignon group in France have identified intradialytic and pre-dialysis exercise as a promising non-pharmacological intervention capable of mitigating myocardial stunning and improving cardiac function. In summary, while classical cardioprotective strategies continue to fall short, emerging evidence highlights the potential of innovative, physiology-based approaches—optimizing dialysis modalities and leveraging exercise-induced cardioprotection—to address the persistent cardiovascular burden of uremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"22 S1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In 2025, nephrology saw major advances in diagnosing and managing chronic kidney diseases. A new diagnostic framework, CKDx (chronic kidney disease of unexplained cause), was proposed to standardize patient evaluation by integrating genetic and histological tests. Therapeutic progress includes the demonstrated efficacy of atrasentan, an endothelin type A receptor antagonist, in IgA nephropathy, as well as that of iptacopan, an oral inhibitor of factor B, in IgA nephropathy and C3-deposit glomerulopathy. Obinutuzumab, a humanized anti-CD20 antibody, has also shown efficacy in lupus nephritis. Nephroprotective strategies, such as the finerenone-empagliflozin combination, have revealed significant benefits. Finally, emerging molecules such as baxdrostat, an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, and oral semaglutide, a GLP-1 analog, have demonstrated efficacy in resistant hypertension and in cardiovascular-risk reduction, respectively. These two molecules are currently being evaluated for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease. However, challenges persist, including unequal access to innovative treatments, gaps in early screening, and the impact of climate change on kidney function. These results highlight the need for an integrated approach, combining innovation, equity, and adaptation to environmental changes to improve the care of patients with kidney diseases.
{"title":"Nephrology highlights in 2025: Diagnostic and therapeutic advances and emerging challenges","authors":"Adrien Flahault","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2026.157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2026.157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2025, nephrology saw major advances in diagnosing and managing chronic kidney diseases. A new diagnostic framework, CKDx (chronic kidney disease of unexplained cause), was proposed to standardize patient evaluation by integrating genetic and histological tests. Therapeutic progress includes the demonstrated efficacy of atrasentan, an endothelin type A receptor antagonist, in IgA nephropathy, as well as that of iptacopan, an oral inhibitor of factor B, in IgA nephropathy and C3-deposit glomerulopathy. Obinutuzumab, a humanized anti-CD20 antibody, has also shown efficacy in lupus nephritis. Nephroprotective strategies, such as the finerenone-empagliflozin combination, have revealed significant benefits. Finally, emerging molecules such as baxdrostat, an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, and oral semaglutide, a GLP-1 analog, have demonstrated efficacy in resistant hypertension and in cardiovascular-risk reduction, respectively. These two molecules are currently being evaluated for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease. However, challenges persist, including unequal access to innovative treatments, gaps in early screening, and the impact of climate change on kidney function. These results highlight the need for an integrated approach, combining innovation, equity, and adaptation to environmental changes to improve the care of patients with kidney diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"22 S1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Until 2009, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), a disease mediated by complement-induced endothelial activation, had a poor renal prognosis, with common progression to kidney failure and frequent recurrence after kidney transplantation, condemning often young patients to lifelong dialysis. Initially developed for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies – eculizumab and later ravulizumab – were rapidly evaluated for the management of atypical HUS. Clinical development was based on uncontrolled studies, but with effects on microangiopathy and renal function recovery that were clearly more favorable than the spontaneous course of the disease. Nowadays, the use of anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies is recommended as first-line therapy for thrombotic microangiopathy associated with atypical HUS and for relapse prevention, particularly in the context of kidney transplantation, in both adults and children. Ravulizumab appears to have the same efficacy as eculizumab while allowing injections to be spaced every 8 weeks instead of every 2. Finally, the most feared adverse effect of these treatments is meningococcal infection, whose frequency is fortunately low thanks to prophylactic vaccination strategies and antibiotic prevention.
{"title":"Targeting complement in atypical hemolytic and uremic syndrome: development and current status of eculizumab and ravulizumab","authors":"Nicolas Maillard, François Provot","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2025.160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2025.160","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Until 2009, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), a disease mediated by complement-induced endothelial activation, had a poor renal prognosis, with common progression to kidney failure and frequent recurrence after kidney transplantation, condemning often young patients to lifelong dialysis. Initially developed for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies – eculizumab and later ravulizumab – were rapidly evaluated for the management of atypical HUS. Clinical development was based on uncontrolled studies, but with effects on microangiopathy and renal function recovery that were clearly more favorable than the spontaneous course of the disease.\u0000Nowadays, the use of anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies is recommended as first-line therapy for thrombotic microangiopathy associated with atypical HUS and for relapse prevention, particularly in the context of kidney transplantation, in both adults and children. Ravulizumab appears to have the same efficacy as eculizumab while allowing injections to be spaced every 8 weeks instead of every 2. Finally, the most feared adverse effect of these treatments is meningococcal infection, whose frequency is fortunately low thanks to prophylactic vaccination strategies and antibiotic prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"21 7","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145902131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"SFNDT 2025: Priorities for the next two year","authors":"Christophe Mariat","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2025.147","DOIUrl":"10.1684/ndt.2025.147","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"21 6","pages":"479-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145423770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Young carers are aged between 6 and 25 and regularly provide support to a sick relative. No study has yet focused on these young people in the context of parental dialysis. The aim of this study was to explore how parents on dialysis experience the support provided by their children, and to compare the experiences of parents undergoing dialysis at home and those treated in medical facilities.
Method: Thirty parents on dialysis (19 at home, 11 in facilities) completed a questionnaire (sociodemographic and medical information, autonomy in activities, quality of life, and support provided by their children). Fifteen parents also took part in semi-structured interviews.
Results: Overall, parents on dialysis reported low levels of support from their children, whether in terms of emotional support, household tasks, instrumental assistance, or personal care. Parents receiving dialysis outside the home perceived higher levels of support than those receiving dialysis at home. The interviews helped to clarify the observed differences and highlighted the specific forms of support provided by children of parents undergoing home dialysis. Parents also reported negative emotions among their children (anxiety, sadness) as well as the development of psychosocial skills.
Conclusion: These results underline the importance of paying attention to the children of dialysis patients and the support they may provide. Further studies are needed to better understand the underlying family dynamics and to explore the children’s perspective.
{"title":"How do parents undergoing dialysis perceive the support provided by their children? A mixedmethods study to better identify young carers","authors":"Safiya Arrob, Julie Glatz, Filiz Eren, Michèle Koleck, Aurélie Untas","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2025.149","DOIUrl":"10.1684/ndt.2025.149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Young carers are aged between 6 and 25 and regularly provide support to a sick relative. No study has yet focused on these young people in the context of parental dialysis. The aim of this study was to explore how parents on dialysis experience the support provided by their children, and to compare the experiences of parents undergoing dialysis at home and those treated in medical facilities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty parents on dialysis (19 at home, 11 in facilities) completed a questionnaire (sociodemographic and medical information, autonomy in activities, quality of life, and support provided by their children). Fifteen parents also took part in semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, parents on dialysis reported low levels of support from their children, whether in terms of emotional support, household tasks, instrumental assistance, or personal care. Parents receiving dialysis outside the home perceived higher levels of support than those receiving dialysis at home. The interviews helped to clarify the observed differences and highlighted the specific forms of support provided by children of parents undergoing home dialysis. Parents also reported negative emotions among their children (anxiety, sadness) as well as the development of psychosocial skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results underline the importance of paying attention to the children of dialysis patients and the support they may provide. Further studies are needed to better understand the underlying family dynamics and to explore the children’s perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"21 6","pages":"483-493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145508629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stanislas Trolonge, Stanislas Bataille, Céline Pasian, Laetitia Koppe, Philippe Chauveau
Malnutrition remains a major concern among hemodialysis patients in France and worldwide. An online survey was disseminated by the Association de Diététique et Nutrition en Néphrologie (ADNN) between March and June 2023, targeting its dietitian members via email and professional social networks. A total of 88 responses were collected (35% of those solicited), of which 73% were from the public or non-profit sector, and 47% of professionals reported following more than 150 hemodialysis patients annually. The aim of this study was to assess the practices of dietitian-nutritionists regarding the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of malnutrition, with a particular focus on the use of intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) in France. The reported prevalence of malnutrition ranged from 20 to 75% of patients, with 60% of dietitians estimating it between 20 and 50%. Screening was performed every 1 to 3 months by 70% of respondents, mainly based on weight loss (98%), body mass index (BMI) (89%), and biological markers such as albumin and CRP (monitored monthly by 50 to 60%). Normalized protein nitrogen appearance (nPNA) was used monthly by 42% of dietitians and at least annually by 80%. Regarding IDPN, only 35% reported having a protocol, 69% initiated it in cases of severe malnutrition or significant weight loss, and 45% reported infusion volumes of between 500 and 1,000 mL per session. The mean duration of use was 3 months for 28% of respondents but could extend beyond a year depending on nutritional recovery. Overall, 81% reported insufficient knowledge, and 75% expressed a need for additional training. This survey highlights a marked heterogeneity in the choice, duration, and monitoring of IDPN, the frequent absence of standardized protocols, and substantial training needs. It also underscores the lack of dedicated time for dietitians to follow up with hemodialysis patients: More than half of the respondents reported spending less than 30% of their working time on this population, thereby compromising the effectiveness of nutritional screening and management. Better standardization of practices, increased time allocation for patient care, and enhanced competencies in artificial nutrition appear essential to optimize the nutritional management of hemodialysis patients.
营养不良仍然是法国和全世界血液透析患者的一个主要问题。在2023年3月至6月期间,disamtsamicet Nutrition en nsamhlogie (ADNN)通过电子邮件和专业社交网络向其营养师会员发布了一项在线调查。共收集了88份回复(占征求回复的35%),其中73%来自公共或非营利部门,47%的专业人员报告每年跟踪150多名血液透析患者。本研究的目的是评估营养学家在筛查、诊断和治疗营养不良方面的做法,特别关注法国分析内肠外营养(IDPN)的使用。报告的营养不良患病率在20%至75%之间,60%的营养师估计在20%至50%之间。70%的调查对象每1至3个月进行一次筛查,主要基于体重减轻(98%)、体重指数(BMI)(89%)和白蛋白和CRP等生物标志物(每月监测50%至60%)。42%的营养师每月使用标准化蛋白质氮外观(nPNA), 80%的营养师至少每年使用一次。关于IDPN,只有35%的人报告有方案,69%的人在严重营养不良或体重显著减轻的情况下启动该方案,45%的人报告每次输液量在500至1,000毫升之间。28%的受访者的平均使用时间为3个月,但根据营养恢复情况,可以延长一年以上。总体而言,81%的人表示知识不足,75%的人表示需要额外的培训。这项调查强调了在IDPN的选择、持续时间和监测方面存在明显的异质性,经常缺乏标准化的协议,以及大量的培训需求。它还强调了营养师缺乏专门的时间来跟踪血液透析患者:超过一半的受访者报告说,他们在这一人群身上花费的工作时间不到30%,从而影响了营养筛查和管理的有效性。更好的标准化做法,增加患者护理的时间分配,以及提高人工营养的能力,对于优化血液透析患者的营养管理至关重要。
{"title":"Nutritional care and use of intradialytic parenteral nutrition in hemodialysis in France: A national survey among nephrology dietitians","authors":"Stanislas Trolonge, Stanislas Bataille, Céline Pasian, Laetitia Koppe, Philippe Chauveau","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2025.150","DOIUrl":"10.1684/ndt.2025.150","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malnutrition remains a major concern among hemodialysis patients in France and worldwide. An online survey was disseminated by the Association de Diététique et Nutrition en Néphrologie (ADNN) between March and June 2023, targeting its dietitian members via email and professional social networks. A total of 88 responses were collected (35% of those solicited), of which 73% were from the public or non-profit sector, and 47% of professionals reported following more than 150 hemodialysis patients annually. The aim of this study was to assess the practices of dietitian-nutritionists regarding the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of malnutrition, with a particular focus on the use of intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) in France. The reported prevalence of malnutrition ranged from 20 to 75% of patients, with 60% of dietitians estimating it between 20 and 50%. Screening was performed every 1 to 3 months by 70% of respondents, mainly based on weight loss (98%), body mass index (BMI) (89%), and biological markers such as albumin and CRP (monitored monthly by 50 to 60%). Normalized protein nitrogen appearance (nPNA) was used monthly by 42% of dietitians and at least annually by 80%. Regarding IDPN, only 35% reported having a protocol, 69% initiated it in cases of severe malnutrition or significant weight loss, and 45% reported infusion volumes of between 500 and 1,000 mL per session. The mean duration of use was 3 months for 28% of respondents but could extend beyond a year depending on nutritional recovery. Overall, 81% reported insufficient knowledge, and 75% expressed a need for additional training. This survey highlights a marked heterogeneity in the choice, duration, and monitoring of IDPN, the frequent absence of standardized protocols, and substantial training needs. It also underscores the lack of dedicated time for dietitians to follow up with hemodialysis patients: More than half of the respondents reported spending less than 30% of their working time on this population, thereby compromising the effectiveness of nutritional screening and management. Better standardization of practices, increased time allocation for patient care, and enhanced competencies in artificial nutrition appear essential to optimize the nutritional management of hemodialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"21 6","pages":"495-508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145508553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-adherence to treatment affects 30% to 50% of patients with chronic diseases. It is associated with an increase in the frequency of acute complications and hospitalizations. In chronic kidney disease (CKD), non-adherence concerns drug treatment, diet, and lifestyle. It may affect up to 62% of hemodialysis patients and 28% of kidney transplant recipients. The long asymptomatic phase of CKD contrasts with a heavy medication burden—two factors that can hinder treatment adherence. In addition, the high prevalence of cognitive and depressive disorders, often underdiagnosed, is associated with the risk of non-adherence in CKD patients. Young age and social isolation have also been identified as risk factors. However, adherence is often difficult to assess. It may vary from one patient to the other, and in the same patient over the course of the disease. Non-adherence can sometimes reflect underlying psychological, personal, or social difficulties. Every health care professional involved in the care of CKD patients has a role to play in detecting poor adherence. In this general review, we discuss the psychological and medical aspects underlying non-adherence, as well as potential therapeutic levers.
{"title":"Treatment adherence and chronic kidney disease: Psychological aspects, contributing factors, and potential levers","authors":"Stanislas Bobot, Valentine Cazauvieilh, Flora Lefèvre, Justine Solignac, Safia Mecerli, Philippe Brunet, Mickaël Bobot","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2025.145","DOIUrl":"10.1684/ndt.2025.145","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-adherence to treatment affects 30% to 50% of patients with chronic diseases. It is associated with an increase in the frequency of acute complications and hospitalizations. In chronic kidney disease (CKD), non-adherence concerns drug treatment, diet, and lifestyle. It may affect up to 62% of hemodialysis patients and 28% of kidney transplant recipients. The long asymptomatic phase of CKD contrasts with a heavy medication burden—two factors that can hinder treatment adherence. In addition, the high prevalence of cognitive and depressive disorders, often underdiagnosed, is associated with the risk of non-adherence in CKD patients. Young age and social isolation have also been identified as risk factors. However, adherence is often difficult to assess. It may vary from one patient to the other, and in the same patient over the course of the disease. Non-adherence can sometimes reflect underlying psychological, personal, or social difficulties. Every health care professional involved in the care of CKD patients has a role to play in detecting poor adherence. In this general review, we discuss the psychological and medical aspects underlying non-adherence, as well as potential therapeutic levers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"21 6","pages":"509-519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145403310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Type II mixed cryoglobulinemia is most commonly associated with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. The occurrence of marginal zone lymphoma as the underlying cause is rare, especially in the absence of gastric involvement.
Case report: A 63-year-old woman with hypertension and hypothyroidism initially presented with transient purpura following a urinary tract infection. Two months later, she developed acute kidney injury, proteinuria (2.3 g/24 h), and microscopic hematuria. Laboratory tests showed type II mixed cryoglobulinemia (IgM κ + IgG) with hypocomplementemia. Viral serologies, including HCV, were negative. Renal biopsy revealed membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with IgM and IgG deposits. Blood and bone marrow immunophenotyping confirmed an extragastric marginal zone lymphoma. The patient was treated with six cycles of rituximab-bendamustine.
Results: Complete remission was achieved: recovery of renal function (creatinine 84 μmol/L at 12 months), resolution of proteinuria, improvement of anemia, and regression of splenomegaly. No relapse was observed after 18 months of follow-up.
Discussion/conclusion: This case represents a particularly rare presentation of type II mixed cryoglobulinemia revealing an extragastric marginal zone lymphoma in the absence of viral infection or gastric involvement. It contributes to the sparse literature on this uncommon association. Treatment with rituximab-bendamustine appears to be effective.
{"title":"Mixed type II cryoglobulinemiaassociated glomerulonephritis revealing an extragastric marginal zone lymphoma in the absence of viral infection: A rare case report from Bourges Hospital","authors":"Belkacem Mansour, Jean-Michel Goujon, Yacine Foukia, Firas Easy, Anna Bourreau, Abdallah Maakaroun","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2025.146","DOIUrl":"10.1684/ndt.2025.146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type II mixed cryoglobulinemia is most commonly associated with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. The occurrence of marginal zone lymphoma as the underlying cause is rare, especially in the absence of gastric involvement.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 63-year-old woman with hypertension and hypothyroidism initially presented with transient purpura following a urinary tract infection. Two months later, she developed acute kidney injury, proteinuria (2.3 g/24 h), and microscopic hematuria. Laboratory tests showed type II mixed cryoglobulinemia (IgM κ + IgG) with hypocomplementemia. Viral serologies, including HCV, were negative. Renal biopsy revealed membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with IgM and IgG deposits. Blood and bone marrow immunophenotyping confirmed an extragastric marginal zone lymphoma. The patient was treated with six cycles of rituximab-bendamustine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete remission was achieved: recovery of renal function (creatinine 84 μmol/L at 12 months), resolution of proteinuria, improvement of anemia, and regression of splenomegaly. No relapse was observed after 18 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>This case represents a particularly rare presentation of type II mixed cryoglobulinemia revealing an extragastric marginal zone lymphoma in the absence of viral infection or gastric involvement. It contributes to the sparse literature on this uncommon association. Treatment with rituximab-bendamustine appears to be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"21 6","pages":"530-537"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145403112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}