Muhammad Arslan, Muhammad Usman, Mohamed Gamal El-Din
{"title":"Metal Sulfides in Aged-Coarse Sands Tailings Facilitate Naphthenic Acids Removal from Oil Sands Process Water","authors":"Muhammad Arslan, Muhammad Usman, Mohamed Gamal El-Din","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of natural substrates for oil sands process water (OSPW) reclamation offers advantages such as onsite availability and scalability. This study evaluated potential of aged and fresh coarse sand tailings (CST) towards removal of classical naphthenic acids (NAs) from a real OSPW obtained from an oil sands’ tailing ponds in Alberta (NAs: 4.87 mg/L). Aged-CST achieved superior removal efficiencies of NAs (96.5%), aromatics (>90%), and acid-extractable organics (∼95%), compared to fresh-CST, which showed limited removal (∼34.3%) similar to conventional slow sand filters (∼30–45%). Although limited surface area of both CST materials (∼1.82 m<sup>2</sup>/g) was not conducive to physical adsorption, the oxidation of metal sulfides in aged-CST enhanced the chemical reactivity, surface heterogeneity, and microbial activity, facilitating efficient adsorption, precipitation, and biodegradation of NAs. Kinetics modelling indicated that aged-CST strongly fit the pseudo-second order (R² = 0.969, k₂ = 0.003 g mg⁻¹ h⁻¹) and Elovich model (R² = 0.876, 1/b = 1.713 mg g⁻¹), indicating chemisorption as dominant removal mechanism, while fresh-CST exhibited poor fits and limited performance. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy analyses revealed that intensities of hydroxyl groups, aliphatic, carboxylic, and ester compounds significantly increased in aged-CST after filtration. A labelled isotope desorption study using Lauric-D23 acid cross-verified that adsorption and precipitation (∼65%) with metal sulfides were key mechanisms, while remaining ∼35% were chemically transformed by-products, as indicated by mass balance. Microbial community analysis showed that aged-CST had higher microbial richness (Chao1 ∼1000) compared to fresh-CST (∼500, respectively). Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria (e.g., <em>Rhodococcus</em> and <em>Sphingomonas</em>) and acidophilic bacteria (<em>Bryobacter, Candidatus Solibacter</em>) were dominant in aged-CST, facilitating NAs biodegradation. BE-SPME analysis confirmed successful removal (∼86%) of bioavailable organics removing toxicity. This study highlights aged-CST as a viable natural substrate for OSPW reclamation, offering insights into its fate and opportunities for resource recovery.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of natural substrates for oil sands process water (OSPW) reclamation offers advantages such as onsite availability and scalability. This study evaluated potential of aged and fresh coarse sand tailings (CST) towards removal of classical naphthenic acids (NAs) from a real OSPW obtained from an oil sands’ tailing ponds in Alberta (NAs: 4.87 mg/L). Aged-CST achieved superior removal efficiencies of NAs (96.5%), aromatics (>90%), and acid-extractable organics (∼95%), compared to fresh-CST, which showed limited removal (∼34.3%) similar to conventional slow sand filters (∼30–45%). Although limited surface area of both CST materials (∼1.82 m2/g) was not conducive to physical adsorption, the oxidation of metal sulfides in aged-CST enhanced the chemical reactivity, surface heterogeneity, and microbial activity, facilitating efficient adsorption, precipitation, and biodegradation of NAs. Kinetics modelling indicated that aged-CST strongly fit the pseudo-second order (R² = 0.969, k₂ = 0.003 g mg⁻¹ h⁻¹) and Elovich model (R² = 0.876, 1/b = 1.713 mg g⁻¹), indicating chemisorption as dominant removal mechanism, while fresh-CST exhibited poor fits and limited performance. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy analyses revealed that intensities of hydroxyl groups, aliphatic, carboxylic, and ester compounds significantly increased in aged-CST after filtration. A labelled isotope desorption study using Lauric-D23 acid cross-verified that adsorption and precipitation (∼65%) with metal sulfides were key mechanisms, while remaining ∼35% were chemically transformed by-products, as indicated by mass balance. Microbial community analysis showed that aged-CST had higher microbial richness (Chao1 ∼1000) compared to fresh-CST (∼500, respectively). Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria (e.g., Rhodococcus and Sphingomonas) and acidophilic bacteria (Bryobacter, Candidatus Solibacter) were dominant in aged-CST, facilitating NAs biodegradation. BE-SPME analysis confirmed successful removal (∼86%) of bioavailable organics removing toxicity. This study highlights aged-CST as a viable natural substrate for OSPW reclamation, offering insights into its fate and opportunities for resource recovery.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.