Legumes vary strongly in their quality as hosts for parasitic plants: interactions between the root hemiparasite Rhinanthus alectorolophus and 30 legume species.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES Annals of botany Pub Date : 2025-07-14 DOI:10.1093/aob/mcaf023
B Moncalvillo, T M Sandner, D Matthies
{"title":"Legumes vary strongly in their quality as hosts for parasitic plants: interactions between the root hemiparasite Rhinanthus alectorolophus and 30 legume species.","authors":"B Moncalvillo, T M Sandner, D Matthies","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Host identity can strongly affect the performance of root hemiparasitic plants. Legumes have frequently been observed to be particularly beneficial hosts and it has been suggested that they are in general good hosts due to their association with rhizobia, but exceptions have been observed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied the interactions of the root hemiparasite Rhinanthus alectorolophus with 30 legume species. We related parasite performance and morphology to traits of uninfected hosts and the number and size of haustoria. We also analysed sections of haustoria quantitatively using morphometrics.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>There was enormous variation in the biomass and other traits of R. alectorolophus with the different legume species. The suitability of a legume species as a host had a significant phylogenetic component (Pagel's λ = 0.51). Parasite performance increased with the biomass of uninfected hosts. In contrast, host root traits explained little of the variation in parasite performance and there was no anatomical evidence of defence against infection. Parasite biomass was very strongly and positively related to the number of haustoria formed, but part of the variation due to host identity could not be explained by the host traits studied and the number of haustoria, suggesting a role for variation in the quality of compounds provided by the hosts. Damage to the hosts increased with mean parasite mass, but some legumes were tolerant of parasite attack. Sensitivity of the hosts to parasitism showed only a very weak phylogenetic signal (λ < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Legumes are not universally good hosts for root hemiparasites. Instead their quality as hosts ranges from very beneficial to very poor. Moreover, clades within the legumes differ in their suitability as hosts for hemiparasites. Parasites grow best with fast-growing legumes that quickly produce large root systems with which many and large haustoria are formed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":"1147-1164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Host identity can strongly affect the performance of root hemiparasitic plants. Legumes have frequently been observed to be particularly beneficial hosts and it has been suggested that they are in general good hosts due to their association with rhizobia, but exceptions have been observed.

Methods: We studied the interactions of the root hemiparasite Rhinanthus alectorolophus with 30 legume species. We related parasite performance and morphology to traits of uninfected hosts and the number and size of haustoria. We also analysed sections of haustoria quantitatively using morphometrics.

Key results: There was enormous variation in the biomass and other traits of R. alectorolophus with the different legume species. The suitability of a legume species as a host had a significant phylogenetic component (Pagel's λ = 0.51). Parasite performance increased with the biomass of uninfected hosts. In contrast, host root traits explained little of the variation in parasite performance and there was no anatomical evidence of defence against infection. Parasite biomass was very strongly and positively related to the number of haustoria formed, but part of the variation due to host identity could not be explained by the host traits studied and the number of haustoria, suggesting a role for variation in the quality of compounds provided by the hosts. Damage to the hosts increased with mean parasite mass, but some legumes were tolerant of parasite attack. Sensitivity of the hosts to parasitism showed only a very weak phylogenetic signal (λ < 0.01).

Conclusions: Legumes are not universally good hosts for root hemiparasites. Instead their quality as hosts ranges from very beneficial to very poor. Moreover, clades within the legumes differ in their suitability as hosts for hemiparasites. Parasites grow best with fast-growing legumes that quickly produce large root systems with which many and large haustoria are formed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
豆科植物作为寄主的质量差异很大:根半寄生虫Rhinanthus alectorolophus与30种豆科植物之间的相互作用。
背景与目的:寄主身份对根半寄生植物的生长有重要影响。豆科植物经常被观察到是特别有益的寄主,并且有人认为,由于它们与根瘤菌的联系,它们通常是良好的寄主,但也有例外。方法:研究了30种豆科植物的根半寄生昆虫角鼻虫(Rhinanthus alectorolophus)的相互作用。我们将寄生性能和形态与未感染寄主的性状和吸器的数量和大小联系起来。我们还使用形态计量学对吸器切片进行了定量分析。关键结果:不同豆科植物种类间,刺毛鼠的生物量和其他性状存在巨大差异。豆科植物作为寄主的适宜性具有显著的系统发育成分(Pagel λ= 0.51)。寄生性能随未感染寄主生物量的增加而增加。相比之下,寄主根系性状几乎不能解释寄生虫性能的变化,也没有解剖学上的证据表明它们抵御感染。寄生物生物量与吸器数量呈极显著正相关,但寄主身份的部分变化不能用所研究的寄主性状和吸器数量来解释,这可能与寄主提供的化合物质量有关。对寄主的伤害随寄主平均质量的增加而增加,但有些豆科植物对寄主的攻击具有耐受性。寄主对寄生的敏感性仅表现出极弱的系统发育信号(λ < 0.01)。结论:豆科植物并不是根半寄生虫的良好寄主。相反,它们作为宿主的质量从非常有益到非常差。此外,豆科植物中的分支在作为半寄生虫宿主的适宜性方面存在差异。寄生虫在快速生长的豆科植物上生长得最好,豆科植物能迅速产生大根系,形成许多大吸器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
期刊最新文献
Extrafloral nectaries influence Lepidopteran herbivore communities and network structure in the Brazilian Cerrado. Specific leaf area modulates but does not explain the association between abiotic stress tolerance and insect feeding guild prevalence in Northern Hemisphere woody plants. Integration of structural variation enhances the resolution of population structure and helps delineate conservation units. Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals How PdMYB44 Enhances Drought Tolerance in Pugionium dolabratum by Activating the AsA-GSH Cycle. Soil microbiota promote the success of the perennial legume Lupinus polyphyllus more strongly in invasive than in native populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1