Seizure after flumazenil reversal for total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam versus propofol: a matched retrospective cohort analysis of a large Japanese nationwide inpatient database.

IF 9.1 1区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.046

Shuichiro Komatsu, Toshiaki Isogai, Kanako Makito, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga

{"title":"Seizure after flumazenil reversal for total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam versus propofol: a matched retrospective cohort analysis of a large Japanese nationwide inpatient database.","authors":"Shuichiro Komatsu, Toshiaki Isogai, Kanako Makito, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Remimazolam is a novel anaesthetic and sedative agent that offers several advantages, including minimal adverse haemodynamic effects and availability of a specific antidote, flumazenil. Flumazenil can induce seizures as an adverse effect; however, the incidence of seizures after flumazenil reversal after total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam (remimazolam-flumazenil) remains unknown. We compared the risk of seizures between total i.v. anaesthesia with remimazolam-flumazenil or propofol.Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent elective surgery (excluding brain surgery) with total i.v. anaesthesia in Japan between April 2020 and March 2022 using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Patients were divided into remimazolam-flumazenil and propofol groups. Patients in the remimazolam-flumazenil group were matched to those in the propofol group at a variable ratio of 1:3 (maximum) based on age, sex, hospital, and type of surgery. We conducted conditional logistic regression analyses to assess the association between total i.v. anaesthesia with remimazolam-flumazenil and the incidence of perioperative seizures.Results: We identified 12 033 patients who underwent total i.v. anaesthesia with remimazolam-flumazenil and 432 275 patients with propofol, creating a matched cohort of 19 105. The crude incidence of seizures was 0.66% (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.68%). There was no significant difference in seizures between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-2.37).Conclusions: We observed no significant differences in perioperative seizures between remimazolam-flumazenil and propofol in patients undergoing non-neurological surgery. This suggests that remimazolam-flumazenil is a possible alternative to total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol.","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remimazolam is a novel anaesthetic and sedative agent that offers several advantages, including minimal adverse haemodynamic effects and availability of a specific antidote, flumazenil. Flumazenil can induce seizures as an adverse effect; however, the incidence of seizures after flumazenil reversal after total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam (remimazolam-flumazenil) remains unknown. We compared the risk of seizures between total i.v. anaesthesia with remimazolam-flumazenil or propofol.

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent elective surgery (excluding brain surgery) with total i.v. anaesthesia in Japan between April 2020 and March 2022 using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Patients were divided into remimazolam-flumazenil and propofol groups. Patients in the remimazolam-flumazenil group were matched to those in the propofol group at a variable ratio of 1:3 (maximum) based on age, sex, hospital, and type of surgery. We conducted conditional logistic regression analyses to assess the association between total i.v. anaesthesia with remimazolam-flumazenil and the incidence of perioperative seizures.

Results: We identified 12 033 patients who underwent total i.v. anaesthesia with remimazolam-flumazenil and 432 275 patients with propofol, creating a matched cohort of 19 105. The crude incidence of seizures was 0.66% (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.68%). There was no significant difference in seizures between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-2.37).

Conclusions: We observed no significant differences in perioperative seizures between remimazolam-flumazenil and propofol in patients undergoing non-neurological surgery. This suggests that remimazolam-flumazenil is a possible alternative to total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

British journal of anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学

CiteScore

13.50

自引率

7.10%

发文量

488

审稿时长

27 days

期刊介绍： The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.