Confirmation Bias in Sport Science: Understanding and Mitigating Its Impact.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY International journal of sports physiology and performance Pub Date : 2025-02-07 Print Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2024-0381
Marco Beato, Alexander T Latinjak, Maurizio Bertollo, Daniel Boullosa
{"title":"Confirmation Bias in Sport Science: Understanding and Mitigating Its Impact.","authors":"Marco Beato, Alexander T Latinjak, Maurizio Bertollo, Daniel Boullosa","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Confirmation bias, a cognitive phenomenon deeply ingrained in human thinking, shapes our perception of reality. It leads individuals to favor information that aligns with their preexisting beliefs while dismissing or undervaluing the contrary evidence. In sport science, where precision and evidence-based practices are critical aspects to optimize performance, confirmation bias can decisively impact decision-making processes. In this context, practitioners rely on both objective and subjective data to be interpreted to enhance athletic performance. However, confirmation bias introduces a subtle yet powerful distortion, which is difficult to control and quantify. We usually believe that our observations can justify expectations or predictions about future observations, as well as broader generalizations beyond what we have directly observed-inductive inferences. Researchers and practitioners may therefore unknowingly seek out evidence that confirms their beliefs, inadvertently overlooking alternative viewpoints and interpretations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper explores the concept of confirmation bias in sport science, providing practical examples in the contexts of testing, training, and monitoring. By understanding how confirmation bias operates (ie, heuristic of decision making), we may develop strategies to mitigate its effects and promote more accurate and effective decision making in sport science (eg, performance).</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1306-1311"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Confirmation bias, a cognitive phenomenon deeply ingrained in human thinking, shapes our perception of reality. It leads individuals to favor information that aligns with their preexisting beliefs while dismissing or undervaluing the contrary evidence. In sport science, where precision and evidence-based practices are critical aspects to optimize performance, confirmation bias can decisively impact decision-making processes. In this context, practitioners rely on both objective and subjective data to be interpreted to enhance athletic performance. However, confirmation bias introduces a subtle yet powerful distortion, which is difficult to control and quantify. We usually believe that our observations can justify expectations or predictions about future observations, as well as broader generalizations beyond what we have directly observed-inductive inferences. Researchers and practitioners may therefore unknowingly seek out evidence that confirms their beliefs, inadvertently overlooking alternative viewpoints and interpretations.

Conclusions: This paper explores the concept of confirmation bias in sport science, providing practical examples in the contexts of testing, training, and monitoring. By understanding how confirmation bias operates (ie, heuristic of decision making), we may develop strategies to mitigate its effects and promote more accurate and effective decision making in sport science (eg, performance).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育科学中的确认偏误:理解并减轻其影响。
目的:确认偏误是一种在人类思维中根深蒂固的认知现象,它塑造了我们对现实的感知。它导致个人倾向于与他们先前存在的信念一致的信息,而忽视或低估相反的证据。在体育科学中,精确和基于证据的实践是优化表现的关键方面,确认偏差会对决策过程产生决定性影响。在这种情况下,从业者依靠客观和主观的数据来解释,以提高运动成绩。然而,确认偏误引入了一种微妙而强大的扭曲,这是难以控制和量化的。我们通常认为,我们的观察可以证明对未来观察的期望或预测是正确的,也可以证明超出我们直接观察到的更广泛的归纳推断是正确的。因此,研究人员和实践者可能在不知不觉中寻找证实他们信念的证据,无意中忽略了其他观点和解释。结论:本文探讨了确认偏差在运动科学中的概念,并提供了在测试、训练和监测方面的实际例子。通过理解确认偏差是如何运作的(即决策的启发式),我们可以制定策略来减轻其影响,并促进运动科学(例如,表现)中更准确和有效的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Performance Decrements in Elite Athletes During Exercise Under Hot and Humid Ambient Conditions. Reliability of Lower-Limb Strength Tests According to Maturity Status in Young Male Elite Football Players. Reliability of 10- and 30-Second Tethered Swimming Tests in Highly Trained Swimmers: Influence of Swimming Specialty, Sex, Performance Level, and Evaluator. Acute and Delayed Effects of Sexual Activity on Athletic Performance: A Scoping Review Across Sex, Age, and Ethnicity. The Influence of Endurance Training on the Relationship Between Running Power and Oxygen Consumption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1