Comparison of environmental radioactivity in road dust between a city and a megacity: geo-environmental evaluation, health risks, and potential remediation.

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/etojnl/vgae027
Rahat Khan, Sayma Zahan Akhi, Md Harunor Rashid Khan, Sadiya Sultana, Saad Aldawood, Md Samium Basir, Md Shohel Parvez, Kamrun Naher, Md Ahosan Habib, Abubakr M Idris, Dhiman Kumer Roy
{"title":"Comparison of environmental radioactivity in road dust between a city and a megacity: geo-environmental evaluation, health risks, and potential remediation.","authors":"Rahat Khan, Sayma Zahan Akhi, Md Harunor Rashid Khan, Sadiya Sultana, Saad Aldawood, Md Samium Basir, Md Shohel Parvez, Kamrun Naher, Md Ahosan Habib, Abubakr M Idris, Dhiman Kumer Roy","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgae027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pioneering study represents a comprehensive comparative analysis of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs: 226Ra (≈238U),232Th, 40K) on the roadside dust samples collected from a coastal city (Khulna) and a highly urban megacity (Dhaka), Bangladesh. The corresponding radioactivity was calculated based on Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis of elemental abundances (uranium [U], thorium [Th], and potassium [K]). Averagen=30 radioactivity levels of 226Ra (≈238U), 232Th, and 40K in the road dust of Khulna city were 46.82 ± 24, 74.79 ± 25, and 541.14 ± 160.8, whereas in Dhaka city, they were 84.4 ± 13, 126 ± 11, and 549 ± 48 (Bq.kg-1), respectively. Khulna city had 1.3, 2.5, and 1.4 times greater 226Ra (≈238U), 232Th, and 40K radioactivity than the global average values, respectively. For Dhaka city, the following values were 2.42, 4.2, and 1.4 times elevated. The levels of radioactivity in Dhaka city are significantly higher than those in Khulna city; however, both cities have exceeded the world average values. The mechanisms for the enrichment and dispersion of NORMs from their fundamental source (surface soil) were studied, considering waterlogging, relative solubility-controlled leaching and translocation, climate conditions, and aerodynamic fractionations (dry and wet air deposition). The computation of standard radiological indices indicates risks to human health. Respiratory harm can be inflicted by α-particles originating from the radioactive decay products of 232Th and 238U. In addition to public awareness, policymakers should prioritize limiting the evolution of dust particles to mitigate the associated health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":"44 2","pages":"344-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pioneering study represents a comprehensive comparative analysis of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs: 226Ra (≈238U),232Th, 40K) on the roadside dust samples collected from a coastal city (Khulna) and a highly urban megacity (Dhaka), Bangladesh. The corresponding radioactivity was calculated based on Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis of elemental abundances (uranium [U], thorium [Th], and potassium [K]). Averagen=30 radioactivity levels of 226Ra (≈238U), 232Th, and 40K in the road dust of Khulna city were 46.82 ± 24, 74.79 ± 25, and 541.14 ± 160.8, whereas in Dhaka city, they were 84.4 ± 13, 126 ± 11, and 549 ± 48 (Bq.kg-1), respectively. Khulna city had 1.3, 2.5, and 1.4 times greater 226Ra (≈238U), 232Th, and 40K radioactivity than the global average values, respectively. For Dhaka city, the following values were 2.42, 4.2, and 1.4 times elevated. The levels of radioactivity in Dhaka city are significantly higher than those in Khulna city; however, both cities have exceeded the world average values. The mechanisms for the enrichment and dispersion of NORMs from their fundamental source (surface soil) were studied, considering waterlogging, relative solubility-controlled leaching and translocation, climate conditions, and aerodynamic fractionations (dry and wet air deposition). The computation of standard radiological indices indicates risks to human health. Respiratory harm can be inflicted by α-particles originating from the radioactive decay products of 232Th and 238U. In addition to public awareness, policymakers should prioritize limiting the evolution of dust particles to mitigate the associated health risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市与特大城市道路粉尘环境放射性比较:地质环境评价、健康风险与潜在补救措施。
这项开创性的研究对孟加拉国沿海城市(库尔纳)和高度城市化的大城市(达卡)收集的路边尘埃样本中天然存在的放射性物质(规范:226Ra(≈238U),232Th, 40K)进行了全面的比较分析。根据元素丰度(铀[U]、钍[Th]和钾[K])的仪器中子活化分析计算相应的放射性。库尔纳市道路粉尘中226Ra(≈238U)、232Th和40K的平均=30放射性水平分别为46.82±24、74.79±25和541.14±160.8,达卡市为84.4±13、126±11和549±48 (Bq.kg-1)。库尔纳市226Ra(≈238U)、232Th和40K的放射性分别是全球平均值的1.3倍、2.5倍和1.4倍。对于达卡市,以下数值分别是2.42、4.2和1.4倍。达卡市的放射性水平明显高于库尔纳市;然而,这两个城市都超过了世界平均水平。考虑到内涝、相对溶解度控制的淋滤和迁移、气候条件和空气动力分异(干湿空气沉积),研究了规范从其基本来源(表层土壤)富集和分散的机制。标准放射指标的计算表明了对人体健康的风险。来自232Th和238U放射性衰变产物的α-粒子可造成呼吸损伤。除了公众意识之外,决策者还应优先考虑限制粉尘颗粒的演变,以减轻相关的健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
期刊最新文献
Toxicological effects of 2,6-Dimethylphenol on Galleria mellonella: Insights into Immunotoxicity and Cuticular Barrier Disruption. Freshwater Snails Avoid PFOS But Only At Concentrations Well Above EPA Safe Water Standards. Interaction dynamics of agricultural fungicides at water-nanoplastics interfaces and the effects of dissolved natural organic matter. Prior pesticide exposure reduces drought tolerance in Arctic and temperate springtails-effects of sequential stressors. Probabilistic Emissions Model for Organic UV Filters Released to Recreational Waters during Swimming/Bathing Events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1