Effect of Er: YAG laser and different surface treatment methods on the push-out bond strength of glass fiber post to self adhesive resin cement.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Lasers in Medical Science Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1007/s10103-025-04317-x
Nouran Samy Mohammed Elalfy, Reham Said Elbasty
{"title":"Effect of Er: YAG laser and different surface treatment methods on the push-out bond strength of glass fiber post to self adhesive resin cement.","authors":"Nouran Samy Mohammed Elalfy, Reham Said Elbasty","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04317-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare the push-out bond strength of adhesive resin cement and glass fiber posts (GFP) at different root levels after exposure to Er: YAG laser irradiation compared to other conventional surface treatment procedures. A total of 24 mandibular premolars were decoronated, root canal treatment was done, post spaces were prepared, and roots were mounted in acrylic resin blocks. Fiber posts were divided into four groups (n = 6) according to surface treatment methods: (1) silane only (control group), (2) Er: YAG laser 1.5 W + silane, (3) 30% hydrogen peroxide + silane, (4) sandblasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles + silane. GFP were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement. Scanning electron microscope images with 500x magnification were taken for all groups. Push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine at different root levels. The difference between groups was statistically significant with laser group recording the highest mean ± SD value of push-out bond strength (5.668042 ± 1.16 MPa), followed by the H2O2 group, then the control group, meanwhile the lowest value was recorded with Sand-blasting group. There were no statistically significant differences between the Control group and Er: YAG group; Control group and sandblasted group. The difference between the radicular regions was not statistically significant, with the middle region recorded the highest push-out bond strength (4.746851 ± 0.73 MPa). GPF surface treatment using an Er: YAG laser is effective as it increases the retention to resin cement, while sandblasting decreases fiber post retention to resin cement. The hydrogen peroxide and the control groups give similar bond strength. The middle and apical regions of GFP have better retention to resin cement than the coronal one.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04317-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare the push-out bond strength of adhesive resin cement and glass fiber posts (GFP) at different root levels after exposure to Er: YAG laser irradiation compared to other conventional surface treatment procedures. A total of 24 mandibular premolars were decoronated, root canal treatment was done, post spaces were prepared, and roots were mounted in acrylic resin blocks. Fiber posts were divided into four groups (n = 6) according to surface treatment methods: (1) silane only (control group), (2) Er: YAG laser 1.5 W + silane, (3) 30% hydrogen peroxide + silane, (4) sandblasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles + silane. GFP were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement. Scanning electron microscope images with 500x magnification were taken for all groups. Push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine at different root levels. The difference between groups was statistically significant with laser group recording the highest mean ± SD value of push-out bond strength (5.668042 ± 1.16 MPa), followed by the H2O2 group, then the control group, meanwhile the lowest value was recorded with Sand-blasting group. There were no statistically significant differences between the Control group and Er: YAG group; Control group and sandblasted group. The difference between the radicular regions was not statistically significant, with the middle region recorded the highest push-out bond strength (4.746851 ± 0.73 MPa). GPF surface treatment using an Er: YAG laser is effective as it increases the retention to resin cement, while sandblasting decreases fiber post retention to resin cement. The hydrogen peroxide and the control groups give similar bond strength. The middle and apical regions of GFP have better retention to resin cement than the coronal one.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Er: YAG激光及不同表面处理方式对玻璃纤维桩与自粘树脂水泥推出粘结强度的影响
比较Er: YAG激光照射后不同根级胶粘剂树脂水泥与玻璃纤维桩(GFP)的推出强度与其他常规表面处理方法的比较。下颌前磨牙共24颗,进行根管治疗,预备桩位,用丙烯酸树脂块固定牙根。光纤桩按照表面处理方式分为4组(n = 6):(1)纯硅烷组(对照组),(2)Er: YAG激光1.5 W +硅烷组,(3)30%过氧化氢+硅烷组,(4)喷砂50 μm氧化铝颗粒+硅烷组。采用自粘树脂水泥对GFP进行胶结。各组均取500倍放大扫描电镜图像。在不同的根层次上使用通用试验机进行推出测试。两组间差异有统计学意义,激光组推出粘结强度均值±SD值最高(5.668042±1.16 MPa), H2O2组次之,对照组次之,喷砂组最低。对照组与Er: YAG组比较,差异无统计学意义;对照组和喷砂组。根状区域之间的差异无统计学意义,中间区域的外推结合强度最高(4.746851±0.73 MPa)。使用Er: YAG激光进行GPF表面处理是有效的,因为它增加了对树脂水泥的保留,而喷砂则降低了纤维桩对树脂水泥的保留。过氧化氢和对照组的结合强度相似。GFP的中部和根尖区比冠状区对树脂粘接剂的固位更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
期刊最新文献
Role of laser therapy in enhancing chemotherapy efficiency in breast cancer: low level laser therapy, photochemotherapy, and photodynamic therapy as promising treatments. The efficacy and safety of 1470 nm diode laser in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective, multicenter study. Real-world ocular safety performance of dermatologic laser and intense pulsed light goggles: a clinical safety audit. Synergistic anti-inflammatory effects of the aqueous extract from Desmodium heterophyllum and photobiomodulation in a carrageenan-induced paw edema model. A systematic review of therapeutic procedures for the treatment of morphea and systemic sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1