Haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells combined with bone marrow or unrelated cord blood as grafts for haematological malignancies: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

IF 15.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Lancet Haematology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00372-7
Sijian Yu, Fen Huang, Na Xu, Zhongming Zhang, Can Liu, Xiaojun Xu, Zhiping Fan, Xiangzong Zeng, Qiong Liu, Guo Qiu, Xu Xi, Ren Lin, Xinquan Liang, Yirong Jiang, Min Dai, Hua Jin, Xiaofang Li, Shunqing Wang, Meiqing Wu, Jing Sun, Li Xuan, Qifa Liu
{"title":"Haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells combined with bone marrow or unrelated cord blood as grafts for haematological malignancies: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.","authors":"Sijian Yu, Fen Huang, Na Xu, Zhongming Zhang, Can Liu, Xiaojun Xu, Zhiping Fan, Xiangzong Zeng, Qiong Liu, Guo Qiu, Xu Xi, Ren Lin, Xinquan Liang, Yirong Jiang, Min Dai, Hua Jin, Xiaofang Li, Shunqing Wang, Meiqing Wu, Jing Sun, Li Xuan, Qifa Liu","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00372-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrospective studies suggested that haploidentical transplantation combined with unrelated cord blood might improve survival for patients with haematological malignancies. We aimed to assess whether transplantation of haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) plus unrelated cord blood would achieve superior disease-free survival compared with transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at seven hospitals in China. Eligible patients (aged 18-65 years) had a diagnosis of haematological malignancy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and transplant comorbidity index of 0-2, and were receiving their first allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow or haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood. The primary endpoint was 1-year disease-free survival. All efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05290545) and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between March 5, 2022, and Jan 2, 2023, 357 participants were screened for eligibility, and 314 were randomly assigned to receive transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood (n=157) or haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow (n=157). Median follow-up was 17·2 months (IQR 10·0-20·8) after random assignment. 1-year disease-free survival was 82·2% (95% CI 75·2-87·3) in the group receiving haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood (PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group) and 65·6% (57·6-72·5) in the group receiving haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow ([PBSCs plus bone marrow group] hazard ratio [HR] 0·47, 95% CI 0·30-0·74; p=0·0010). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events within 100 days of transplantation in participants in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood and PBSCs plus bone marrow groups were infections (58 [37%] of 157 vs 77 [49%] of 157, p=0·030), acute graft-versus-host disease (49 [31%] vs 61 [39%]), and gastrointestinal disorders (38 [24%] vs 38 [24%]). Seven (4%) patients in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group and 17 (11%) in the PBSCs plus bone marrow group died of transplantation-related causes within 100 days of transplantation. Causes of deaths in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group versus the PBSCs plus bone marrow group included infections (four [3%] vs 11 [7%]), acute graft-versus-host disease (one [1%] vs three [2%]), vascular disorders (two [1%] vs one [1%]), cardiac disorders (none vs one [1%]), and respiratory disorders (none vs one [1%]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood achieved superior 1-year disease-free survival compared with transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow in patients with haematological malignancies, with a more satisfactory safety profile. Our results suggest that combining haploidentical PBSCs with unrelated cord blood, rather than with bone marrow, could be a better treatment option for this population.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00372-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retrospective studies suggested that haploidentical transplantation combined with unrelated cord blood might improve survival for patients with haematological malignancies. We aimed to assess whether transplantation of haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) plus unrelated cord blood would achieve superior disease-free survival compared with transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow in this population.

Methods: We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at seven hospitals in China. Eligible patients (aged 18-65 years) had a diagnosis of haematological malignancy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and transplant comorbidity index of 0-2, and were receiving their first allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow or haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood. The primary endpoint was 1-year disease-free survival. All efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05290545) and is complete.

Findings: Between March 5, 2022, and Jan 2, 2023, 357 participants were screened for eligibility, and 314 were randomly assigned to receive transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood (n=157) or haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow (n=157). Median follow-up was 17·2 months (IQR 10·0-20·8) after random assignment. 1-year disease-free survival was 82·2% (95% CI 75·2-87·3) in the group receiving haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood (PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group) and 65·6% (57·6-72·5) in the group receiving haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow ([PBSCs plus bone marrow group] hazard ratio [HR] 0·47, 95% CI 0·30-0·74; p=0·0010). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events within 100 days of transplantation in participants in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood and PBSCs plus bone marrow groups were infections (58 [37%] of 157 vs 77 [49%] of 157, p=0·030), acute graft-versus-host disease (49 [31%] vs 61 [39%]), and gastrointestinal disorders (38 [24%] vs 38 [24%]). Seven (4%) patients in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group and 17 (11%) in the PBSCs plus bone marrow group died of transplantation-related causes within 100 days of transplantation. Causes of deaths in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group versus the PBSCs plus bone marrow group included infections (four [3%] vs 11 [7%]), acute graft-versus-host disease (one [1%] vs three [2%]), vascular disorders (two [1%] vs one [1%]), cardiac disorders (none vs one [1%]), and respiratory disorders (none vs one [1%]).

Interpretation: Transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood achieved superior 1-year disease-free survival compared with transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow in patients with haematological malignancies, with a more satisfactory safety profile. Our results suggest that combining haploidentical PBSCs with unrelated cord blood, rather than with bone marrow, could be a better treatment option for this population.

Funding: None.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Haematology
Lancet Haematology HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
26.00
自引率
0.80%
发文量
323
期刊介绍: Launched in autumn 2014, The Lancet Haematology is part of the Lancet specialty journals, exclusively available online. This monthly journal is committed to publishing original research that not only sheds light on haematological clinical practice but also advocates for change within the field. Aligned with the Lancet journals' tradition of high-impact research, The Lancet Haematology aspires to achieve a similar standing and reputation within its discipline. It upholds the rigorous reporting standards characteristic of all Lancet titles, ensuring a consistent commitment to quality in its contributions to the field of haematology.
期刊最新文献
Vodobatinib for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia resistant or intolerant to multiple lines of previous therapy: an open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2 trial. Fine-tuning of haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells combined with bone marrow or unrelated cord blood as grafts for haematological malignancies: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Correction to Lancet Haematol 2025; 12: e109-19. Expanding treatment options for warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1