Haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells combined with bone marrow or unrelated cord blood as grafts for haematological malignancies: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

IF 17.7 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Lancet Haematology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00372-7
Sijian Yu, Fen Huang, Na Xu, Zhongming Zhang, Can Liu, Xiaojun Xu, Zhiping Fan, Xiangzong Zeng, Qiong Liu, Guo Qiu, Xu Xi, Ren Lin, Xinquan Liang, Yirong Jiang, Min Dai, Hua Jin, Xiaofang Li, Shunqing Wang, Meiqing Wu, Jing Sun, Li Xuan, Qifa Liu
{"title":"Haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells combined with bone marrow or unrelated cord blood as grafts for haematological malignancies: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.","authors":"Sijian Yu, Fen Huang, Na Xu, Zhongming Zhang, Can Liu, Xiaojun Xu, Zhiping Fan, Xiangzong Zeng, Qiong Liu, Guo Qiu, Xu Xi, Ren Lin, Xinquan Liang, Yirong Jiang, Min Dai, Hua Jin, Xiaofang Li, Shunqing Wang, Meiqing Wu, Jing Sun, Li Xuan, Qifa Liu","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00372-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrospective studies suggested that haploidentical transplantation combined with unrelated cord blood might improve survival for patients with haematological malignancies. We aimed to assess whether transplantation of haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) plus unrelated cord blood would achieve superior disease-free survival compared with transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at seven hospitals in China. Eligible patients (aged 18-65 years) had a diagnosis of haematological malignancy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and transplant comorbidity index of 0-2, and were receiving their first allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow or haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood. The primary endpoint was 1-year disease-free survival. All efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05290545) and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between March 5, 2022, and Jan 2, 2023, 357 participants were screened for eligibility, and 314 were randomly assigned to receive transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood (n=157) or haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow (n=157). Median follow-up was 17·2 months (IQR 10·0-20·8) after random assignment. 1-year disease-free survival was 82·2% (95% CI 75·2-87·3) in the group receiving haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood (PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group) and 65·6% (57·6-72·5) in the group receiving haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow ([PBSCs plus bone marrow group] hazard ratio [HR] 0·47, 95% CI 0·30-0·74; p=0·0010). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events within 100 days of transplantation in participants in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood and PBSCs plus bone marrow groups were infections (58 [37%] of 157 vs 77 [49%] of 157, p=0·030), acute graft-versus-host disease (49 [31%] vs 61 [39%]), and gastrointestinal disorders (38 [24%] vs 38 [24%]). Seven (4%) patients in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group and 17 (11%) in the PBSCs plus bone marrow group died of transplantation-related causes within 100 days of transplantation. Causes of deaths in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group versus the PBSCs plus bone marrow group included infections (four [3%] vs 11 [7%]), acute graft-versus-host disease (one [1%] vs three [2%]), vascular disorders (two [1%] vs one [1%]), cardiac disorders (none vs one [1%]), and respiratory disorders (none vs one [1%]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood achieved superior 1-year disease-free survival compared with transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow in patients with haematological malignancies, with a more satisfactory safety profile. Our results suggest that combining haploidentical PBSCs with unrelated cord blood, rather than with bone marrow, could be a better treatment option for this population.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":" ","pages":"e190-e200"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00372-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retrospective studies suggested that haploidentical transplantation combined with unrelated cord blood might improve survival for patients with haematological malignancies. We aimed to assess whether transplantation of haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) plus unrelated cord blood would achieve superior disease-free survival compared with transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow in this population.

Methods: We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at seven hospitals in China. Eligible patients (aged 18-65 years) had a diagnosis of haematological malignancy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and transplant comorbidity index of 0-2, and were receiving their first allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow or haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood. The primary endpoint was 1-year disease-free survival. All efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05290545) and is complete.

Findings: Between March 5, 2022, and Jan 2, 2023, 357 participants were screened for eligibility, and 314 were randomly assigned to receive transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood (n=157) or haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow (n=157). Median follow-up was 17·2 months (IQR 10·0-20·8) after random assignment. 1-year disease-free survival was 82·2% (95% CI 75·2-87·3) in the group receiving haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood (PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group) and 65·6% (57·6-72·5) in the group receiving haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow ([PBSCs plus bone marrow group] hazard ratio [HR] 0·47, 95% CI 0·30-0·74; p=0·0010). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events within 100 days of transplantation in participants in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood and PBSCs plus bone marrow groups were infections (58 [37%] of 157 vs 77 [49%] of 157, p=0·030), acute graft-versus-host disease (49 [31%] vs 61 [39%]), and gastrointestinal disorders (38 [24%] vs 38 [24%]). Seven (4%) patients in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group and 17 (11%) in the PBSCs plus bone marrow group died of transplantation-related causes within 100 days of transplantation. Causes of deaths in the PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood group versus the PBSCs plus bone marrow group included infections (four [3%] vs 11 [7%]), acute graft-versus-host disease (one [1%] vs three [2%]), vascular disorders (two [1%] vs one [1%]), cardiac disorders (none vs one [1%]), and respiratory disorders (none vs one [1%]).

Interpretation: Transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus unrelated cord blood achieved superior 1-year disease-free survival compared with transplantation of haploidentical PBSCs plus bone marrow in patients with haematological malignancies, with a more satisfactory safety profile. Our results suggest that combining haploidentical PBSCs with unrelated cord blood, rather than with bone marrow, could be a better treatment option for this population.

Funding: None.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单倍体外周血干细胞联合骨髓或无关脐带血作为血液恶性肿瘤的移植物:一项开放标签、多中心、随机、3期试验
背景:回顾性研究表明,单倍体移植联合非相关脐带血可能提高血液学恶性肿瘤患者的生存率。我们的目的是评估在该人群中,与单倍体外周血干细胞加骨髓移植相比,单倍体外周血干细胞加非相关脐带血移植是否能获得更好的无病生存。方法:我们在中国的7家医院进行了一项开放标签、随机化的3期试验。符合条件的患者(年龄18-65岁),诊断为血液系统恶性肿瘤,东部肿瘤合作组表现状态为0-2,移植合并症指数为0-2,并接受首次同种异体造血干细胞移植。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受单倍相同的PBSCs +骨髓移植或单倍相同的PBSCs +不相关的脐带血移植。主要终点为1年无病生存期。在意向治疗人群中评估了所有疗效和安全性终点。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT05290545)并已完成。研究结果:在2022年3月5日至2023年1月2日期间,357名参与者进行了资格筛选,314名参与者被随机分配接受单倍体PBSCs +非相关脐带血移植(n=157)或单倍体PBSCs +骨髓移植(n=157)。随机分配后中位随访时间为17.2个月(IQR 10.0 ~ 20.8)。接受单倍同型PBSCs +非亲属脐带血组(PBSCs +非亲属脐带血组)的1年无病生存率为82.2% (95% CI 75.2 ~ 87.3),接受单倍同型PBSCs +骨髓组([PBSCs +骨髓组])的1年无病生存率为65.6%(57.6 ~ 72.5),风险比[HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 ~ 0.74;p = 0·0010)。在PBSCs +非相关脐带血组和PBSCs +骨髓组的参与者中,移植后100天内最常见的3-5级不良事件是感染(157人中58人[37%]vs 157人中77人[49%],p= 0.030)、急性移植物抗宿主病(49人[31%]vs 61人[39%])和胃肠道疾病(38人[24%]vs 38人[24%])。7例(4%)PBSCs +非相关脐带血组患者和17例(11%)PBSCs +骨髓组患者在移植后100天内死于与移植相关的原因。PBSCs +非相关脐带血组与PBSCs +骨髓组的死亡原因包括感染(4例[3%]vs 11例[7%])、急性移植物抗宿主病(1例[1%]vs 3例[2%])、血管疾病(2例[1%]vs 1例[1%])、心脏疾病(无例vs 1例[1%])和呼吸系统疾病(无例vs 1例[1%])。解释:与单倍体PBSCs +骨髓移植相比,单倍体PBSCs +非相关脐带血移植在血液学恶性肿瘤患者中获得了更高的1年无病生存期,并且具有更令人满意的安全性。我们的研究结果表明,将单倍体相同的PBSCs与不相关的脐带血结合,而不是与骨髓结合,可能是这一人群更好的治疗选择。资金:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Haematology
Lancet Haematology HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
26.00
自引率
0.80%
发文量
323
期刊介绍: Launched in autumn 2014, The Lancet Haematology is part of the Lancet specialty journals, exclusively available online. This monthly journal is committed to publishing original research that not only sheds light on haematological clinical practice but also advocates for change within the field. Aligned with the Lancet journals' tradition of high-impact research, The Lancet Haematology aspires to achieve a similar standing and reputation within its discipline. It upholds the rigorous reporting standards characteristic of all Lancet titles, ensuring a consistent commitment to quality in its contributions to the field of haematology.
期刊最新文献
Myelodysplastic syndromes versus acute myeloid leukaemia: biology or blasts-what truly defines the disease and does it matter? Varnimcabtagene autoleucel for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Spain (CART19-BE-02): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Bortezomib and vorinostat in combination with mitoxantrone, dexamethasone, and pegasparaginase during induction and reinduction for infants with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre single-arm phase 1/2 study. Predictors of clinically relevant bleeding during extended anticoagulation for cancer-associated VTE. Tele-prehabilitation for allogeneic HCT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1