The Use of 8-mm Powered Articulation Endostapler for Sublobar Resection in Children. Preliminary Case Series.

Carlos Delgado-Miguel, Ennio Fuentes, Pablo Aguado, Ricardo Díez
{"title":"The Use of 8-mm Powered Articulation Endostapler for Sublobar Resection in Children. Preliminary Case Series.","authors":"Carlos Delgado-Miguel, Ennio Fuentes, Pablo Aguado, Ricardo Díez","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the treatment of choice in children with subpleural bullous lesions, in which endoscopic staplers are routinely used. Recently, a new generation of electronically powered stapling systems was developed. Our aim is to compare the use of a new 8-mm electronic endostapler with a 12-mm nonelectronic conventional device in thoracoscopic sublobar resection in children. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective single-center study in patients under 18 years who underwent VATS sublobar resection of subpleural bullae in our institution between January 2022 and December 2023. They were divided into two groups according to the type of endostapler used (8 mm electronic or 12 mm non-electronic). Demographic, clinical, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We included 8 patients (4 in each group), with a median age of 13.2 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.7-15.4 years), without demographic or clinical differences between them. Median surgery time was 42 minutes (IQR 35-55 minutes) in the 8-mm electronic group compared with 53 minutes (IQR 45-65 minutes) in the 12-mm group. There were no intraoperative complications and no reconversions to open surgery. Median length of drainage therapy did not show significant differences between them (3 days in both groups; <i>P</i> = .512). No postoperative complications were reported. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Preliminary results of the 8-mm electronic endostapler appear to be comparable with the conventional mechanical stapler. Advantages include smaller incisions, as well as one-handed, push-button operation, which eliminates the manual firing force and possibly enables more precise resection. Further studies are still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the treatment of choice in children with subpleural bullous lesions, in which endoscopic staplers are routinely used. Recently, a new generation of electronically powered stapling systems was developed. Our aim is to compare the use of a new 8-mm electronic endostapler with a 12-mm nonelectronic conventional device in thoracoscopic sublobar resection in children. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center study in patients under 18 years who underwent VATS sublobar resection of subpleural bullae in our institution between January 2022 and December 2023. They were divided into two groups according to the type of endostapler used (8 mm electronic or 12 mm non-electronic). Demographic, clinical, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: We included 8 patients (4 in each group), with a median age of 13.2 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.7-15.4 years), without demographic or clinical differences between them. Median surgery time was 42 minutes (IQR 35-55 minutes) in the 8-mm electronic group compared with 53 minutes (IQR 45-65 minutes) in the 12-mm group. There were no intraoperative complications and no reconversions to open surgery. Median length of drainage therapy did not show significant differences between them (3 days in both groups; P = .512). No postoperative complications were reported. Conclusion: Preliminary results of the 8-mm electronic endostapler appear to be comparable with the conventional mechanical stapler. Advantages include smaller incisions, as well as one-handed, push-button operation, which eliminates the manual firing force and possibly enables more precise resection. Further studies are still needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Does the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index Predict Adverse Outcomes after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? A Case-Control Study by the RIRSearch Group. Laparoscopy for Gastrointestinal Perforation in Neonates: A New Animal Model for Training. The Use of 8-mm Powered Articulation Endostapler for Sublobar Resection in Children. Preliminary Case Series. Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium. Open Versus Minimally Invasive Morgagni Hernia Repair in Pediatric Surgery: A Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1