Erratum to “The usefulness of surgical drains on short term outcomes among patients undergoing craniotomy at the Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza Tanzania” [World Neurosurgery: X(22C) (2024) (100323)]

Q1 Medicine World Neurosurgery: X Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100422
Dennis Onsombi , Gerald Mayaya , Vladimir Herrera , Anton Manyanga , Washington Leonald , Samuel Byabato , James Lubuulwa
{"title":"Erratum to “The usefulness of surgical drains on short term outcomes among patients undergoing craniotomy at the Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza Tanzania” [World Neurosurgery: X(22C) (2024) (100323)]","authors":"Dennis Onsombi ,&nbsp;Gerald Mayaya ,&nbsp;Vladimir Herrera ,&nbsp;Anton Manyanga ,&nbsp;Washington Leonald ,&nbsp;Samuel Byabato ,&nbsp;James Lubuulwa","doi":"10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postcraniotomy surgical drain placement is commonly used worldwide after various cranial surgical interventions despite the controversy surrounding their use leaving it to the surgeon's preference rather than evidence based practice. However, with the paucity of published data regarding utility in Tanzania, we sought out to determine the occurrence of SFC, incidence of SSI and the length of hospital stay among patients who underwent craniotomies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective cohort study conducted to determine the occurrence of SFC, rate of SSI and the length of hospital stay among patients who underwent craniotomies at BMC from Feb to June 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not have undergone placement of drainage tube following craniotomy and data was collected, entered into Epi-Info version 7.0, extracted as Microsoft-Excel and analyzed using STATA v.13.0 software. Medians and proportions were utilized to describe data, and appropriate statistical tests applied whenever necessary to check for statistical significance. Ethical clearance was sought from the institution board to proceed with the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 77 patients were enrolled into the study, the median patient age (IOR) was 33(18–55) years, and 55 % of patients were males, giving male to female ratio of 2:1. Postcraniotomy drains were used in 36.36 %(28/77) of the patients. Of the craniotomy procedures 52(67.5 %) were due to trauma. Surgical site infection was encountered in 4 patients (5.2 %), subgaleal fluid collection among 11 patients (14.28 %) although this was not significant among the two groups on univariate analysis p = 0.538 and 0.624 respectively. The length of hospital stay was similar in both drainage and non-drainage groups (p = 0.498). In a bivariate analysis on drain use vs patient factors, dural closure (P value= &lt;0.001),skin closure (P value= &lt;0.001) and cormobidities (p value = 0.013),for which on further multivariate regression, watertight dural closure (p = 0.015, OR = 14.15) was found to be associated with less likelihood of drainage use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this single center observational study, we noted that outcomes of patients with post-craniotomy drains were largely equivalent and non-inferior to those without drains who underwent craniotomy for similar neurosurgical conditions at our institution with no statistical significance in terms of occurrence of subgaleal fluid collection, incidence of surgical site infection and length of hospital stay. The use of watertight dura closure significantly reduces the occurrence of SFC. Larger well randomized control and multicentered studies are recommended to further validate our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37134,"journal":{"name":"World Neurosurgery: X","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Neurosurgery: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postcraniotomy surgical drain placement is commonly used worldwide after various cranial surgical interventions despite the controversy surrounding their use leaving it to the surgeon's preference rather than evidence based practice. However, with the paucity of published data regarding utility in Tanzania, we sought out to determine the occurrence of SFC, incidence of SSI and the length of hospital stay among patients who underwent craniotomies.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study conducted to determine the occurrence of SFC, rate of SSI and the length of hospital stay among patients who underwent craniotomies at BMC from Feb to June 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not have undergone placement of drainage tube following craniotomy and data was collected, entered into Epi-Info version 7.0, extracted as Microsoft-Excel and analyzed using STATA v.13.0 software. Medians and proportions were utilized to describe data, and appropriate statistical tests applied whenever necessary to check for statistical significance. Ethical clearance was sought from the institution board to proceed with the study.

Results

A total of 77 patients were enrolled into the study, the median patient age (IOR) was 33(18–55) years, and 55 % of patients were males, giving male to female ratio of 2:1. Postcraniotomy drains were used in 36.36 %(28/77) of the patients. Of the craniotomy procedures 52(67.5 %) were due to trauma. Surgical site infection was encountered in 4 patients (5.2 %), subgaleal fluid collection among 11 patients (14.28 %) although this was not significant among the two groups on univariate analysis p = 0.538 and 0.624 respectively. The length of hospital stay was similar in both drainage and non-drainage groups (p = 0.498). In a bivariate analysis on drain use vs patient factors, dural closure (P value= <0.001),skin closure (P value= <0.001) and cormobidities (p value = 0.013),for which on further multivariate regression, watertight dural closure (p = 0.015, OR = 14.15) was found to be associated with less likelihood of drainage use.

Conclusion

In this single center observational study, we noted that outcomes of patients with post-craniotomy drains were largely equivalent and non-inferior to those without drains who underwent craniotomy for similar neurosurgical conditions at our institution with no statistical significance in terms of occurrence of subgaleal fluid collection, incidence of surgical site infection and length of hospital stay. The use of watertight dura closure significantly reduces the occurrence of SFC. Larger well randomized control and multicentered studies are recommended to further validate our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Neurosurgery: X
World Neurosurgery: X Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
Comparative utility analysis of Chordoma search information between ChatGPT vs. Google Web Letter to the Editor regarding "Using the modified frailty index as a predictor of complications in adults undergoing transforaminal interbody lumbar fusion" Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for patients with 16 or more brain metastases: Retrospective single-institution analysis Trends in stroke-related mortality in California hospitals from 2010 to 2020: Have the large core stroke trials made a difference? Impact of body mass index on perioperative complications, radiographic outcomes, and pseudoarthrosis at one year after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1