Uncertainty quantification of aerosol jet 3D printing process using non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Advanced Engineering Informatics Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.aei.2025.103175
Haining Zhang , Jingyuan Huang , Xiaoge Zhang , Chak-Nam Wong
{"title":"Uncertainty quantification of aerosol jet 3D printing process using non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation","authors":"Haining Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingyuan Huang ,&nbsp;Xiaoge Zhang ,&nbsp;Chak-Nam Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2025.103175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aerosol jet printing (AJP) emerges as an innovative three-dimensional (3D) printing technology by offering a versatile approach for fabricating customized and conformal microelectronic devices directly onto various flexible substrates. There is, though, an inherent process uncertainty in AJP that often leads to variations in critical geometrical properties, particularly printing overspray, which diminishes the reproducibility and uniformity of the produced components. While notable advancements have been made in recent years in modeling and elucidating the critical geometrical properties of AJP, a significant research gap persists in systematically quantifying the uncertainties inherent in the developed physics-based models, which may undermine process reliability and hamper informed decision-making during printing. In this study, an uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis is conducted through non-intrusive generalized polynomial chaos expansion (gPCE) and stochastic collocation within a developed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model applied in AJP. This analysis quantifies the variability in model responses due to uncertainties in the input parameters. Specifically, uncertainties in the main process parameters are effectively captured by modeling them as Gaussian random variables. Subsequently, the modeled input uncertainties are mapped into the stochastic space via a stochastic collocation technique. This is followed by computational simulations of the Navier–Stokes equations conducted using the designated collocation points within a developed CFD model. Finally, a non-intrusive gPCE approach is employed to quantify the uncertainties in velocity and pressure fields, as well as in particle trajectories, based on fluctuations in input process parameters. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no prior investigations made to conduct formal UQ analysis on physics-based models for AJP process. The primary contribution of this study is to address the research gap concerning the lack of systematic studies on UQ analysis for CFD models used in AJP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 103175"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034625000680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aerosol jet printing (AJP) emerges as an innovative three-dimensional (3D) printing technology by offering a versatile approach for fabricating customized and conformal microelectronic devices directly onto various flexible substrates. There is, though, an inherent process uncertainty in AJP that often leads to variations in critical geometrical properties, particularly printing overspray, which diminishes the reproducibility and uniformity of the produced components. While notable advancements have been made in recent years in modeling and elucidating the critical geometrical properties of AJP, a significant research gap persists in systematically quantifying the uncertainties inherent in the developed physics-based models, which may undermine process reliability and hamper informed decision-making during printing. In this study, an uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis is conducted through non-intrusive generalized polynomial chaos expansion (gPCE) and stochastic collocation within a developed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model applied in AJP. This analysis quantifies the variability in model responses due to uncertainties in the input parameters. Specifically, uncertainties in the main process parameters are effectively captured by modeling them as Gaussian random variables. Subsequently, the modeled input uncertainties are mapped into the stochastic space via a stochastic collocation technique. This is followed by computational simulations of the Navier–Stokes equations conducted using the designated collocation points within a developed CFD model. Finally, a non-intrusive gPCE approach is employed to quantify the uncertainties in velocity and pressure fields, as well as in particle trajectories, based on fluctuations in input process parameters. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no prior investigations made to conduct formal UQ analysis on physics-based models for AJP process. The primary contribution of this study is to address the research gap concerning the lack of systematic studies on UQ analysis for CFD models used in AJP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Advanced Engineering Informatics 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
292
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.
期刊最新文献
InceptionV3 based blockage fault diagnosis of centrifugal pump Robust correlation measures for informative frequency band selection in heavy-tailed signals A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for involuntary fall detection using wrist-worn sensors Uncertainty quantification of aerosol jet 3D printing process using non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation Investigating the effects of data and image enhancement techniques on crack detection accuracy in FMPI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1