Predictive modeling of PFAS behavior and degradation in novel treatment scenarios: A review

IF 6.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety and Environmental Protection Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2025.106869
David B. Olawade , James O. Ijiwade , Oluwaseun Fapohunda , Abimbola O. Ige , David O. Olajoyetan , Ojima Zechariah Wada
{"title":"Predictive modeling of PFAS behavior and degradation in novel treatment scenarios: A review","authors":"David B. Olawade ,&nbsp;James O. Ijiwade ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Fapohunda ,&nbsp;Abimbola O. Ige ,&nbsp;David O. Olajoyetan ,&nbsp;Ojima Zechariah Wada","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.106869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental contaminants that resist conventional water treatment methods, raising concerns about their impact on human health and ecosystems. As PFAS contamination becomes increasingly widespread, the need for novel, effective treatment solutions have grown. Predictive modeling offers a promising approach to evaluate PFAS behavior, removal efficiency, and transformation pathways in emerging treatment technologies. This narrative review explores current advancements in predictive models for PFAS remediation, focusing on methods that incorporate PFAS structural characteristics, environmental factors, and treatment type. Three main modeling approaches are discussed: empirical, mechanistic, and machine learning models, each with unique strengths and limitations depending on data availability and treatment conditions. The review also addresses recent developments in advanced treatment systems such as advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), electrochemical treatment, and adsorption, as well as the role of machine learning in optimizing treatment predictions. Key challenges, including data limitations, transformation product toxicity, and model validation, are examined, with recommendations for future research emphasizing data expansion, integration of toxicity predictions, and enhanced model interpretability. By tailoring predictive models to PFAS-specific variables and diverse treatment conditions, researchers can advance sustainable PFAS management practices and guide effective remediation strategies for contaminated sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 106869"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025001363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental contaminants that resist conventional water treatment methods, raising concerns about their impact on human health and ecosystems. As PFAS contamination becomes increasingly widespread, the need for novel, effective treatment solutions have grown. Predictive modeling offers a promising approach to evaluate PFAS behavior, removal efficiency, and transformation pathways in emerging treatment technologies. This narrative review explores current advancements in predictive models for PFAS remediation, focusing on methods that incorporate PFAS structural characteristics, environmental factors, and treatment type. Three main modeling approaches are discussed: empirical, mechanistic, and machine learning models, each with unique strengths and limitations depending on data availability and treatment conditions. The review also addresses recent developments in advanced treatment systems such as advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), electrochemical treatment, and adsorption, as well as the role of machine learning in optimizing treatment predictions. Key challenges, including data limitations, transformation product toxicity, and model validation, are examined, with recommendations for future research emphasizing data expansion, integration of toxicity predictions, and enhanced model interpretability. By tailoring predictive models to PFAS-specific variables and diverse treatment conditions, researchers can advance sustainable PFAS management practices and guide effective remediation strategies for contaminated sites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
Oxide-modified bifunctional carbonaceous cathode: Oxygen-rich alkaline-like microenvironment strengthened hydrogen peroxide as an electron donor to enhance Fe3+ reduction in Fe(III) electro-Fenton Effect of oxygen deficient conditions on oxidative spontaneous combustion characteristics of raw coal and water-immersed air-dried bituminous coal Predictive modeling of PFAS behavior and degradation in novel treatment scenarios: A review Efficient aniline aerofloat degradation by oxygen vacancies-rich copper tailings/peroxymonosulfate system: Performance evaluation and active sites Distribution, environmental behavior, and ecotoxicity of different metal oxide nanoparticles in the aquatic environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1