Risk of high-grade cervical lesions in the second round of primary human papillomavirus testing in CervicalScreen Norway: A population-based cohort study

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1002/ijc.35359
Tone Bjørge, Nathalie C. Støer, Sara K. Hverven, Mari Nygård, Ameli Tropé, Birgit Engesæter
{"title":"Risk of high-grade cervical lesions in the second round of primary human papillomavirus testing in CervicalScreen Norway: A population-based cohort study","authors":"Tone Bjørge,&nbsp;Nathalie C. Støer,&nbsp;Sara K. Hverven,&nbsp;Mari Nygård,&nbsp;Ameli Tropé,&nbsp;Birgit Engesæter","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As many countries are transitioning from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as the primary cervical cancer screening test, we evaluated the impact of cumulative HPV screening during the implementation of HPV screening in the Norwegian cervical cancer screening programme (CervicalScreen Norway). Data from the second HPV screening round was compared with data from the first round. The second-round analyses included only women who returned to routine screening 4–6 years following a negative HPV test in the first round. Associations between screening rounds and HPV positivity, cytology results, and follow-up recommendations were estimated by multinomial logistic regression, and relative risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) by Cox regression. There was a 42% lower risk of being HPV positive in the second screening round compared to the first (age-adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.65), and a 70% lower risk of having high-grade cytology among HPV16 positive women (0.30, 0.12 to 0.78). There was also a 51% reduction in referrals for immediate colposcopy (0.49, 0.39 to 0.62). The overall risk of CIN3+ was 71% lower in the second round compared to the first (age-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.29, 95%CI 0.21–0.40), and lower among HPV16 and other high-risk HPV positive women, but not among HPV18 positives. No cervical cancers were diagnosed in the second round (mean follow-up 2.4 years). Our findings indicate that HPV test results from previous screening rounds should be considered when designing optimal screening algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":"157 2","pages":"251-259"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijc.35359","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.35359","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As many countries are transitioning from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as the primary cervical cancer screening test, we evaluated the impact of cumulative HPV screening during the implementation of HPV screening in the Norwegian cervical cancer screening programme (CervicalScreen Norway). Data from the second HPV screening round was compared with data from the first round. The second-round analyses included only women who returned to routine screening 4–6 years following a negative HPV test in the first round. Associations between screening rounds and HPV positivity, cytology results, and follow-up recommendations were estimated by multinomial logistic regression, and relative risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) by Cox regression. There was a 42% lower risk of being HPV positive in the second screening round compared to the first (age-adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.65), and a 70% lower risk of having high-grade cytology among HPV16 positive women (0.30, 0.12 to 0.78). There was also a 51% reduction in referrals for immediate colposcopy (0.49, 0.39 to 0.62). The overall risk of CIN3+ was 71% lower in the second round compared to the first (age-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.29, 95%CI 0.21–0.40), and lower among HPV16 and other high-risk HPV positive women, but not among HPV18 positives. No cervical cancers were diagnosed in the second round (mean follow-up 2.4 years). Our findings indicate that HPV test results from previous screening rounds should be considered when designing optimal screening algorithms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威宫颈筛查第二轮原发性人乳头瘤病毒检测中高度宫颈病变的风险:一项基于人群的队列研究
由于许多国家正在从细胞学检测过渡到人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测作为主要的宫颈癌筛查试验,我们评估了在挪威宫颈癌筛查计划(CervicalScreen Norway)中实施HPV筛查期间累积HPV筛查的影响。将第二轮HPV筛查的数据与第一轮的数据进行比较。第二轮分析仅包括在第一轮HPV检测呈阴性后4-6年返回常规筛查的妇女。通过多项logistic回归评估筛查轮次与HPV阳性、细胞学结果和随访建议之间的关系,并通过Cox回归评估宫颈上皮内瘤变3级或更糟(CIN3+)的相对风险。与第一轮筛查相比,第二轮筛查中HPV阳性的风险降低了42%(年龄调整相对风险比(aRRR) 0.58, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.53至0.65),HPV16阳性女性的高级别细胞学风险降低了70%(0.30,0.12至0.78)。立即阴道镜检查的转诊也减少了51%(0.49,0.39至0.62)。与第一轮相比,第二轮CIN3+的总体风险降低了71%(年龄调整风险比[aHR] 0.29, 95%CI 0.21-0.40), HPV16和其他高危HPV阳性女性的风险降低,但HPV18阳性女性的风险降低。第二轮(平均随访2.4年)未诊断出宫颈癌。我们的研究结果表明,在设计最佳筛查算法时应考虑以前筛查轮的HPV检测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics, treatment response, and survival outcomes in melanoma patients with cavity carcinomatosis: A retrospective analysis. Personal radio use and risk of cancers among police officers in Great Britain: Results from the airwave health monitoring study. Cancer risks and trends between 1997 and 2018, and effects of restored immunity in people living with HIV: Results from the ANRS CO4 French hospital database on HIV. The efficacy and survival impact of chidamide on angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma based on Epstein-Barr virus stratification in the real world: A multicenter study. Role of the perinatal experience on the risk of acute leukemia in childhood or adolescence: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1