Mariane de Oliveira Gomes, Juliane de Oliveira Gomes, Lucas Fernandes Ananias, Leonardo Augusto Lombardi, Fernando Seiji da Silva, Ana Paula Espindula
{"title":"ANTI-MÜLLERIAN HORMONE AS A DIAGNOSTIC MARKER OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS.","authors":"Mariane de Oliveira Gomes, Juliane de Oliveira Gomes, Lucas Fernandes Ananias, Leonardo Augusto Lombardi, Fernando Seiji da Silva, Ana Paula Espindula","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether serum anti-Müllerian hormone measurement can be used as a diagnostic marker for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared to serum androgen measurement and transvaginal/transabdominal ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted. Electronic and manual searches were carried out in the Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies conducted in humans, published in any language up to August 2023 and addressing the following research question were included: \"Can serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels be used as a diagnostic marker of PCOS in comparison to serum androgen levels and transvaginal/transabdominal ultrasound?\". Furthermore, only articles that used the Rotterdam (2003) criteria, the National Institutes of Health of 1990 criteria, the Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria, or the Evidence-based Guidelines on PCOS from 2013, 2018, and 2023 for diagnosing women with PCOS were included.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers selected the studies, and extracted and analyzed the data. The QUADAS-2 and GRADE tools were used to analyze the risk of bias and certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review included 45 studies. The studies exhibited a low risk of bias in the \"Reference standard\" and \"Flow and time\" domains but showed a moderate risk of bias in the \"Patient selection\" domain and a high risk of bias in the \"Index test\" domain. The meta-analysis of the case-control studies demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 82%, whereas the meta-analysis of the cross-sectional studies showed a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 85%, both with 95% confidence intervals. The certainty of the evidence was rated as \"low\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review showed that serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels can serve as a diagnostic marker for PCOS, when factors like age, test standardization, PCOS phenotypes, and body mass index are considered. Otherwise, the anti-Müllerian hormone should be used as an adjuvant to the PCOS diagnostic criteria established through consensus and/or guidelines. Additionally, serum concentrations reflected the severity of this syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether serum anti-Müllerian hormone measurement can be used as a diagnostic marker for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared to serum androgen measurement and transvaginal/transabdominal ultrasound.
Data sources: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted. Electronic and manual searches were carried out in the Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases.
Study eligibility criteria: Studies conducted in humans, published in any language up to August 2023 and addressing the following research question were included: "Can serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels be used as a diagnostic marker of PCOS in comparison to serum androgen levels and transvaginal/transabdominal ultrasound?". Furthermore, only articles that used the Rotterdam (2003) criteria, the National Institutes of Health of 1990 criteria, the Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria, or the Evidence-based Guidelines on PCOS from 2013, 2018, and 2023 for diagnosing women with PCOS were included.
Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Two independent reviewers selected the studies, and extracted and analyzed the data. The QUADAS-2 and GRADE tools were used to analyze the risk of bias and certainty of evidence.
Results: This systematic review included 45 studies. The studies exhibited a low risk of bias in the "Reference standard" and "Flow and time" domains but showed a moderate risk of bias in the "Patient selection" domain and a high risk of bias in the "Index test" domain. The meta-analysis of the case-control studies demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 82%, whereas the meta-analysis of the cross-sectional studies showed a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 85%, both with 95% confidence intervals. The certainty of the evidence was rated as "low".
Conclusions: This systematic review showed that serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels can serve as a diagnostic marker for PCOS, when factors like age, test standardization, PCOS phenotypes, and body mass index are considered. Otherwise, the anti-Müllerian hormone should be used as an adjuvant to the PCOS diagnostic criteria established through consensus and/or guidelines. Additionally, serum concentrations reflected the severity of this syndrome.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.