Antifungal therapy patterns, healthcare utilization, costs, and mortality in central nervous system and non-central nervous system disseminated coccidioidomycosis across the continuum-of-care

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.001
Fariba Donovan , Mark Bresnik , Belinda Lovelace , Lia Pizzicato , Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi , Mitchell DeKoven , Craig I. Coleman
{"title":"Antifungal therapy patterns, healthcare utilization, costs, and mortality in central nervous system and non-central nervous system disseminated coccidioidomycosis across the continuum-of-care","authors":"Fariba Donovan ,&nbsp;Mark Bresnik ,&nbsp;Belinda Lovelace ,&nbsp;Lia Pizzicato ,&nbsp;Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi ,&nbsp;Mitchell DeKoven ,&nbsp;Craig I. Coleman","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to describe baseline characteristics, antifungal treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, costs, and mortality in patients with central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS disseminated coccidioidomycosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study using IQVIA claims data was conducted to identify adults with disseminated coccidioidomycosis in two mutually exclusive cohorts: those with CNS and those with non-CNS disease. Patients had to have ≥1 medical claim for disseminated coccidioidomycosis from October 2015 to November 2022. Antifungal treatment patterns were assessed, as were all-cause healthcare utilization, costs, and mortality during follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 2218 patients were identified, 28.2% (626/2218) with CNS and 71.8% (1592/2218) with non-CNS disease. In both cohorts, 70.9% (444/626) and 71.6% (1140/1592) of patients initiated first-line antifungal treatment, most with fluconazole (881/1140, 77.3% to 372/444, 83.8%), followed by an azole + lipid amphotericin B (21/444, 4.7% to 81/1140, 7.1%). Azole monotherapy was used often over subsequent lines of antifungal treatment in both cohorts (1049/1140, 92.0% to 122/129, 94.6%). Polyenes peaked in the latter lines of therapy (24/182, 13.2% to 79/408, 19.4%), mostly administered with azoles. Median baseline costs in the CNS and non-CNS cohorts were substantial ($9122 and $8242, respectively). After diagnosis, 29.7% (186/626) of patients in the CNS cohort experienced a subsequent hospitalization and all-cause cost of $28 664 per person per year. The non-CNS patients experienced a similar proportion of patients requiring hospitalization (469/1592, 29.5%) and all-cause costs of $21 240 per person per year. Between 5.4% (34/626) and 6.7% (106/1592) of patients died during follow-up, with death more likely in those with concomitant pulmonary coccidioidomycosis, sepsis, certain immunosuppressive diseases, and prior azole use.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Most patients with either CNS or non-CNS disseminated coccidioidomycosis received an azole first line and demonstrated azole-cycling over subsequent lines. Polyenes were used in the latter lines. Patients utilized substantial healthcare resources and accrued appreciable costs, both before and after diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":"31 6","pages":"Pages 1046-1052"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X2500059X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to describe baseline characteristics, antifungal treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, costs, and mortality in patients with central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS disseminated coccidioidomycosis.

Methods

A retrospective study using IQVIA claims data was conducted to identify adults with disseminated coccidioidomycosis in two mutually exclusive cohorts: those with CNS and those with non-CNS disease. Patients had to have ≥1 medical claim for disseminated coccidioidomycosis from October 2015 to November 2022. Antifungal treatment patterns were assessed, as were all-cause healthcare utilization, costs, and mortality during follow-up.

Results

In total, 2218 patients were identified, 28.2% (626/2218) with CNS and 71.8% (1592/2218) with non-CNS disease. In both cohorts, 70.9% (444/626) and 71.6% (1140/1592) of patients initiated first-line antifungal treatment, most with fluconazole (881/1140, 77.3% to 372/444, 83.8%), followed by an azole + lipid amphotericin B (21/444, 4.7% to 81/1140, 7.1%). Azole monotherapy was used often over subsequent lines of antifungal treatment in both cohorts (1049/1140, 92.0% to 122/129, 94.6%). Polyenes peaked in the latter lines of therapy (24/182, 13.2% to 79/408, 19.4%), mostly administered with azoles. Median baseline costs in the CNS and non-CNS cohorts were substantial ($9122 and $8242, respectively). After diagnosis, 29.7% (186/626) of patients in the CNS cohort experienced a subsequent hospitalization and all-cause cost of $28 664 per person per year. The non-CNS patients experienced a similar proportion of patients requiring hospitalization (469/1592, 29.5%) and all-cause costs of $21 240 per person per year. Between 5.4% (34/626) and 6.7% (106/1592) of patients died during follow-up, with death more likely in those with concomitant pulmonary coccidioidomycosis, sepsis, certain immunosuppressive diseases, and prior azole use.

Discussion

Most patients with either CNS or non-CNS disseminated coccidioidomycosis received an azole first line and demonstrated azole-cycling over subsequent lines. Polyenes were used in the latter lines. Patients utilized substantial healthcare resources and accrued appreciable costs, both before and after diagnosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗真菌治疗模式、医疗保健利用、成本和死亡率在中枢神经系统和非中枢神经系统弥散性球孢子菌病的连续护理。
目的:描述中枢神经系统(CNS)和非中枢神经系统弥散性球孢子菌病患者的基线特征、抗真菌治疗模式、医疗保健利用、成本和死亡率。方法:采用IQVIA索赔数据进行回顾性研究,在两个相互排斥的队列中识别弥散性球孢子菌病成人:中枢神经系统疾病和非中枢神经系统疾病。2015年10月至2022年11月期间,弥漫性球孢子菌病患者必须有≥1项医疗索赔。评估抗真菌治疗模式,以及随访期间的全因医疗保健利用、成本和死亡率。结果:共2218例患者,28.2%(626/ 2218)为中枢神经系统疾病,71.8%(1592 / 2218)为非中枢神经系统疾病。在两个队列中,70.9%(444/626)和71.6%(1,140/1,592)的患者开始一线抗真菌治疗,其中氟康唑最多(881/1,140,77.3%至372/444,83.8%),其次是唑+脂质两性霉素B(21/444, 4.7%至81/1140,7.1%)。在两个队列中,唑单药治疗通常比后续的抗真菌治疗更常用(1,049/1,140,92.0%至122/129,94.6%)。多烯类药物在后期治疗中达到高峰(24/182,13.2%至79/408,19.4%),主要与唑类药物联合使用。中枢神经系统组和非中枢神经系统组的中位基线费用相当可观(分别为9122美元和8242美元)。诊断后,29.7%(186/626)的CNS队列患者随后住院,全因费用为每人每年28,664美元。非中枢神经系统患者需要住院的患者比例相似(469/1,592,29.5%),全因费用为每人每年21,240美元。5.4%(34/626)至6.7%(106/ 1592)的患者在随访期间死亡,死亡更可能发生在合并肺球虫菌病、败血症、某些免疫抑制疾病和既往使用过唑的患者中。结论:大多数中枢神经系统或非中枢神经系统弥散性球孢子菌病患者在一线接受了唑治疗,并在随后的治疗中表现出唑循环。后几系则使用多烯。患者在诊断之前和之后都使用了大量的医疗资源和累积的可观费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis and management of Candida endophthalmitis and chorioretinitis. Candida endocarditis: current perspectives on diagnosis and therapy. Simultaneous detection of Schistosoma haematobium eggs and free miracidia in fresh urine: a diagnostic reminder for clinical microbiology laboratories in non-endemic settings. An introduction to network meta-analyses in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Optimizing antifungal therapies for Candida infections: evidence, resistance, and emerging approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1