Modified Cuff Leak Test for Predicting the Risk of Reintubation in Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Anonymized, Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.033
Xiao Tang, Yan-Mei Gu, Yuan Shi, Zhi-Ming Li, Rui Cao, Sheng-Gui Lu, Yan-Bin Wu, Yun-Feng Tao, Zi-Yan Sun, Yong-Jie Yin, Cheng-Yi Liu, Xiao-Bin Tang, Gui-Fen Gan, Xue-Jun Qin, Dong Yin, Hong-Bin Zhao, Cheng-Ying Liu, Lei Zhang, Ping Fang, Ling-Shuang Du, Li Li, Hai Tan, Meng Li, Ying-Ting Zuo, Bing Sun
{"title":"Modified Cuff Leak Test for Predicting the Risk of Reintubation in Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Anonymized, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Xiao Tang, Yan-Mei Gu, Yuan Shi, Zhi-Ming Li, Rui Cao, Sheng-Gui Lu, Yan-Bin Wu, Yun-Feng Tao, Zi-Yan Sun, Yong-Jie Yin, Cheng-Yi Liu, Xiao-Bin Tang, Gui-Fen Gan, Xue-Jun Qin, Dong Yin, Hong-Bin Zhao, Cheng-Ying Liu, Lei Zhang, Ping Fang, Ling-Shuang Du, Li Li, Hai Tan, Meng Li, Ying-Ting Zuo, Bing Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cuff leak test (CLT) is an important tool to assess the risk of upper airway obstruction after extubation.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does a modified CLT approach have superior ability in predicting reintubation compared with the traditional method?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The primary end point was the incidence of the need for reintubation within 48 hours of extubation. Secondary end points included, among others, the actual incidence of reintubation, the incidence of postextubation stridor (PES), and the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 536 patients were randomized to either the modified CLT group (n = 268) or the control group (n = 268). The incidence of reintubation within 48 hours of extubation did not differ between the groups. PES within 24 hours of extubation was more frequent in the modified CLT group than in the control group (5.22% vs 1.49%; OR, 0.275 [95% CI, 0.089-0.846]; P = .028). The IMV duration was shorter in the modified CLT group than in the control group (137 hours [74, 218] vs 159 hours [95, 252]; OR, 1.001 [95% CI, 1.000-1.002]; P = .046). In the patients with IMV duration ≥ 6 days, the incidence of PES was 2.95% in the modified CLT group and 0.74% in the control group (OR, 0.203 [95% CI, 0.042-0.975]; P = .048).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Compared with the control group, the modified CLT approach might better predict PES within 24 hours of extubation, especially for patients with IMV duration longer than 6 days, but it was not shown to decrease the reintubation incidence and mortality.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05550220; URL: clinicaltrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"119-130"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The cuff leak test (CLT) is an important tool to assess the risk of upper airway obstruction after extubation.

Research question: Does a modified CLT approach have superior ability in predicting reintubation compared with the traditional method?

Study design and methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The primary end point was the incidence of the need for reintubation within 48 hours of extubation. Secondary end points included, among others, the actual incidence of reintubation, the incidence of postextubation stridor (PES), and the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

Results: A total of 536 patients were randomized to either the modified CLT group (n = 268) or the control group (n = 268). The incidence of reintubation within 48 hours of extubation did not differ between the groups. PES within 24 hours of extubation was more frequent in the modified CLT group than in the control group (5.22% vs 1.49%; OR, 0.275 [95% CI, 0.089-0.846]; P = .028). The IMV duration was shorter in the modified CLT group than in the control group (137 hours [74, 218] vs 159 hours [95, 252]; OR, 1.001 [95% CI, 1.000-1.002]; P = .046). In the patients with IMV duration ≥ 6 days, the incidence of PES was 2.95% in the modified CLT group and 0.74% in the control group (OR, 0.203 [95% CI, 0.042-0.975]; P = .048).

Interpretation: Compared with the control group, the modified CLT approach might better predict PES within 24 hours of extubation, especially for patients with IMV duration longer than 6 days, but it was not shown to decrease the reintubation incidence and mortality.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05550220; URL: clinicaltrials.gov.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良袖带泄漏试验预测有创机械通气患者再插管风险:一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。
背景:袖带泄漏试验(CLT)是评估拔管后上气道阻塞风险的重要工具。研究问题:改良的CLT方法在预测再插管方面是否优于传统方法?研究设计和方法:这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。主要终点是拔管后48小时内需要重新插管的发生率。次要终点为实际再插管发生率、拔管后喘鸣发生率、有创机械通气时间等。结果:536例患者随机分为改良CLT组(n = 268)和对照组(n = 268)。拔管后48 h内再插管的发生率在两组间无差异。改良CLT组拔管后24 h内PES发生率高于对照组(5.22% vs. 1.49%;或0.275 [95% ci, 0.089-0.846];P = 0.028)。改良CLT组的IMV持续时间短于对照组(137 h[74,218]对159 h [95,252]);或1.001 [95% ci, 1.000-1.002], p = 0.046)。在IMV持续时间≥6天的患者中,改良CLT组PES发生率为2.95%,对照组为0.74% (OR 0.203 [95% CI, 0.042-0.975], P = 0.048)。结论:与对照组相比,改良的CLT方法可以更好地预测拔管后24 h内的PES,特别是对于IMV持续时间大于6天的患者,但无助于降低再插管发生率和死亡率。临床试验:GOV: NCT05550220,注册于2022年9月19日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
Understanding Pulmonary Fibrosis in Pediatric Interstitial Lung Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis The impact of weight loss on the physiological endotypes associated with obstructive sleep apnea High-Altitude Travel In Patients with Neuromuscular Disease and Thoracic Restrictive Disorders: A Narrative Review THREE-YEAR OUTCOMES OF PROXIMAL HYPOGLOSSAL NERVE STIMULATION IN OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA. Management and Long-Term Outcomes of Persistent Tachypnea of Infancy/Neuroendocrine Cell Hyperplasia of Infancy: A European Multicenter Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1