A comparison between national and international melanoma skin cancer treatment guidelines

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Clinics in dermatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2025.01.011
Michele Rudari MD, Raphael Brooks MD, Adrian Dragu MD, Seyed Arash Alawi MD
{"title":"A comparison between national and international melanoma skin cancer treatment guidelines","authors":"Michele Rudari MD,&nbsp;Raphael Brooks MD,&nbsp;Adrian Dragu MD,&nbsp;Seyed Arash Alawi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.clindermatol.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We analyzed nationally and internationally recognized clinical practice guidelines for melanoma skin cancer to compare their therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. We considered internationally recognized melanoma skin cancer guidelines from the United States (American Academy of Dermatology), Germany (S3-Leitlinie Melanom), and Australia (Cancer Council Australia). We found widespread agreement in diagnostic approaches for cutaneous melanoma, especially in surgical intervention and therapy for regional lymph node involvement. The first difference encountered was the German guidelines advising lymph node ultrasound from stage IB, whereas the US and Australian guidelines recommend it only when sentinel lymph node biopsy is not possible or denied by the patient. A different approach was observed in relation to the assessment of tumor marker S100B in stage III of cutaneous melanoma. The German guidelines advocate for the incorporation of S100B in baseline surveillance, whereas Australia and the United States do not. Although there were some further minor differences, apart from the aforementioned two, all three guidelines under scrutiny exhibit a substantial level of agreement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10358,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in dermatology","volume":"43 1","pages":"Pages 24-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738081X25000288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyzed nationally and internationally recognized clinical practice guidelines for melanoma skin cancer to compare their therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. We considered internationally recognized melanoma skin cancer guidelines from the United States (American Academy of Dermatology), Germany (S3-Leitlinie Melanom), and Australia (Cancer Council Australia). We found widespread agreement in diagnostic approaches for cutaneous melanoma, especially in surgical intervention and therapy for regional lymph node involvement. The first difference encountered was the German guidelines advising lymph node ultrasound from stage IB, whereas the US and Australian guidelines recommend it only when sentinel lymph node biopsy is not possible or denied by the patient. A different approach was observed in relation to the assessment of tumor marker S100B in stage III of cutaneous melanoma. The German guidelines advocate for the incorporation of S100B in baseline surveillance, whereas Australia and the United States do not. Although there were some further minor differences, apart from the aforementioned two, all three guidelines under scrutiny exhibit a substantial level of agreement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家和国际黑色素瘤皮肤癌治疗指南的比较。
我们分析了国内和国际公认的黑色素瘤皮肤癌临床实践指南(CPGs),以比较其治疗和诊断策略。我们参考了来自美国(美国皮肤病学会,AAD)、德国(S3-Leitlinie Melanom)和澳大利亚(澳大利亚癌症委员会,CCA)的国际公认的黑色素瘤皮肤癌指南。我们发现在皮肤黑色素瘤的诊断方法,特别是在手术干预和局部淋巴结受累的治疗广泛一致。第一个不同是德国的指南建议在IB期进行淋巴结超声检查,而美国和澳大利亚的指南建议只有在前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)不可能或患者拒绝时才进行。在皮肤黑色素瘤III期的肿瘤标志物S100B的评估中观察到不同的方法。德国的指导方针主张将S100B纳入基线监测,而澳大利亚和美国则不这样认为。除了上述两项准则外,虽然还有一些细微的差异,但审查中的所有三项准则都表现出相当程度的一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics in dermatology
Clinics in dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
106
审稿时长
3 days
期刊介绍: Clinics in Dermatology brings you the most practical and comprehensive information on the treatment and care of skin disorders. Each issue features a Guest Editor and is devoted to a single timely topic relating to clinical dermatology. Clinics in Dermatology provides information that is... • Clinically oriented -- from evaluation to treatment, Clinics in Dermatology covers what is most relevant to you in your practice. • Authoritative -- world-renowned experts in the field assure the high-quality and currency of each issue by reporting on their areas of expertise. • Well-illustrated -- each issue is complete with photos, drawings and diagrams to illustrate points and demonstrate techniques.
期刊最新文献
Mwah: Klimt's The Kiss, other kisses, and the 'kiss' in clinical dermatology. Probiotics for Skin Aging and Skin Conditions in the Elderly. Ethical Conflicts of the Relative Value Unit System. The insight that went unnoticed: Nikolai Ivanovich Lunin (1853-1937) and research on some indispensable substance of nutrition. Vitamin E in dermatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1