The Benefit of Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy with Radiation Therapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

Krishnan R. Patel MD, MHS , Daniel E. Spratt MD , Phuoc T. Tran MD, PhD , Daniel J. Krauss MD , Anthony V. D'Amico MD, PhD , Paul L. Nguyen MD, MBA
{"title":"The Benefit of Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy with Radiation Therapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer","authors":"Krishnan R. Patel MD, MHS ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Spratt MD ,&nbsp;Phuoc T. Tran MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Krauss MD ,&nbsp;Anthony V. D'Amico MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Paul L. Nguyen MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.01.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>A previous, individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the overall survival (OS) benefit of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ST-ADT) when delivered with radiation therapy (RT) for the subset of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa). However, because of inclusion criteria, several studies such as NRG/RTOG 0815, GETUG-14, and DFCI 95-096 were excluded. Thus, we conducted the present analysis, inclusive of all studies to define the current role of ST-ADT in IR-PCa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted of phase 3 RCTs published or presented between January 1980 and October 2024 which profiled the comparative efficacy of radiation therapy ± ST-ADT in patients with IR-PCa. A study-level, random-effects meta-analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was OS, with secondary endpoints of time-to-biochemical failure (BF) ± biochemical-progress-free survival (bPFS). Meta-regression was used to explore trial-level factors associated with treatment effects. Synthetic individual patient-level OS data were pooled for confirmation and used to estimate the relative and absolute survival benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven RCTs (NRG/RTOG 9408, DFCI 95-096, TROG 96.01, PCS III, EORTC 22991, NRG/RTOG 0815, and GETUG-14) reporting outcomes of 6179 patients were identified. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for HR<sub>OS</sub>, HR<sub>BF</sub>, and HR<sub>BF+</sub><sub>bPFS</sub> were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.97; <em>P</em> = .01), 0.50 (95% CI, 0.37-0.68; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.46-0.65; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), respectively. ST-ADT duration, RT dose, and Gleason score trial population composition were each associated with an increased benefit of ST-ADT for biochemical disease control (all <em>P</em> &lt; .05) but not for OS (all <em>P</em> &gt; .05). Pooling of simulated, patient-level data confirmed the presence of a survival benefit (HR<sub>OS</sub>, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.96], log-rank <em>P</em> = .021), corresponding to an absolute survival benefit of 5% benefit at 10 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The present analysis confirms current knowledge that ST-ADT improves both OS and prostate-specific antigen-based outcomes for unselected patients with IR-PCa to a clinically significant degree.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"122 2","pages":"Pages 407-415"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301625000860","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

A previous, individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the overall survival (OS) benefit of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ST-ADT) when delivered with radiation therapy (RT) for the subset of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa). However, because of inclusion criteria, several studies such as NRG/RTOG 0815, GETUG-14, and DFCI 95-096 were excluded. Thus, we conducted the present analysis, inclusive of all studies to define the current role of ST-ADT in IR-PCa.

Methods and Materials

A systematic review was conducted of phase 3 RCTs published or presented between January 1980 and October 2024 which profiled the comparative efficacy of radiation therapy ± ST-ADT in patients with IR-PCa. A study-level, random-effects meta-analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was OS, with secondary endpoints of time-to-biochemical failure (BF) ± biochemical-progress-free survival (bPFS). Meta-regression was used to explore trial-level factors associated with treatment effects. Synthetic individual patient-level OS data were pooled for confirmation and used to estimate the relative and absolute survival benefit.

Results

Seven RCTs (NRG/RTOG 9408, DFCI 95-096, TROG 96.01, PCS III, EORTC 22991, NRG/RTOG 0815, and GETUG-14) reporting outcomes of 6179 patients were identified. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for HROS, HRBF, and HRBF+bPFS were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.97; P = .01), 0.50 (95% CI, 0.37-0.68; P < .001), and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.46-0.65; P < .001), respectively. ST-ADT duration, RT dose, and Gleason score trial population composition were each associated with an increased benefit of ST-ADT for biochemical disease control (all P < .05) but not for OS (all P > .05). Pooling of simulated, patient-level data confirmed the presence of a survival benefit (HROS, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.96], log-rank P = .021), corresponding to an absolute survival benefit of 5% benefit at 10 years.

Conclusions

The present analysis confirms current knowledge that ST-ADT improves both OS and prostate-specific antigen-based outcomes for unselected patients with IR-PCa to a clinically significant degree.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短期雄激素剥夺联合放疗治疗中危前列腺癌的益处。
先前的一项随机对照试验(rct)的个体患者水平荟萃分析表明,短期雄激素剥夺疗法(ST-ADT)与放疗一起用于中危前列腺癌(IR-PCa)患者亚群的总生存(OS)获益。然而,由于纳入标准的原因,NRG/RTOG 0815、GETUG-14和DFCI 95-096等研究被排除在外。因此,我们进行了当前的分析,包括所有研究,以确定ST-ADT在IR-PCa中的当前作用。方法:系统回顾1980年1月至2024年10月期间发表或发表的III期随机对照试验,这些试验描述了放疗±ST-ADT治疗IR-PCa患者的比较疗效。进行了研究水平的随机效应荟萃分析。该荟萃分析的主要终点为OS,次要终点为生化失败时间(BF)±生化无进展生存期(bPFS)。meta回归用于探讨与治疗效果相关的试验水平因素。综合个体患者水平的OS数据进行确认,并用于估计相对和绝对生存获益。结果:共纳入7项rct (NRG/RTOG 9408、DFCI 95-096、TROG 96.01、PCS III、EORTC 22991、NRG/RTOG 0815和GETUG-14),报告了6279例患者的结局。合并HROS、HRBF和HRBF+bPFS为0.88(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.79-0.97;p = 0.01),0.50 (95% CI: 0.37-0.68;p0.05)。合并模拟的患者水平数据证实存在生存获益(HROS: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.76-0.96], log-rank p = 0.021),对应于10年的绝对生存获益为5%。结论:目前的分析证实了目前的知识,即ST-ADT在临床显著程度上改善了未选择的IR-PCa患者的OS和基于psa的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Misinformation and Overestimation of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Harms-Methodology Matters: A Joint Statement from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and the American College of Radiology. First Patient Study with Visual Biofeedback for Gating Delivery Efficiency Improvements on a 1.5 T MR-linac: Biofeedback for MR-linac Gating: Patient Study. External Validation of The Proliferation Saturation Index Model in Predicting Tumour Volume Regression in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Radiation Therapy. A National Survey of Medical Physicists: Part 2 - Assessing Work Effort and Perceived Challenges and Satisfaction in HDR Brachytherapy. Hypofractionated Versus Normofractionated Accelerated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HYPNO): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3, Noninferiority Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1