Narcissism and Wellbeing: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1177/01461672241307531
Constantine Sedikides, Yixin Tang, Yan Liu, Eva de Boer, Mark Assink, Sander Thomaes, Eddie Brummelman
{"title":"Narcissism and Wellbeing: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Constantine Sedikides, Yixin Tang, Yan Liu, Eva de Boer, Mark Assink, Sander Thomaes, Eddie Brummelman","doi":"10.1177/01461672241307531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Do narcissists enjoy better or worse wellbeing than others? Psychological theories disagree. In an attempt to reconcile them, we conducted a comprehensive cross-cultural meta-analysis testing the core hypotheses that grandiose narcissism would be associated with better wellbeing and vulnerable narcissism with worse wellbeing. We also hypothesized that these associations would be explained by self-esteem and would be stronger in countries higher on individualism. First, as hypothesized, grandiose narcissism was associated with better wellbeing and vulnerable narcissism with worse wellbeing. Second, as hypothesized, both associations became nonsignificant after controlling for self-esteem, suggesting that they are explained by self-esteem. Third, partly as hypothesized, the association between grandiose-but not vulnerable-narcissism and wellbeing was stronger in more individualistic countries. Results held across wellbeing forms (hedonic, eudaimonic) and methods (cross-sectional, longitudinal). Advancing psychological theory, we demonstrated that only grandiose narcissists enjoy better wellbeing, especially in individualistic countries, a phenomenon accounted for by their higher self-esteem.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1461672241307531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241307531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Do narcissists enjoy better or worse wellbeing than others? Psychological theories disagree. In an attempt to reconcile them, we conducted a comprehensive cross-cultural meta-analysis testing the core hypotheses that grandiose narcissism would be associated with better wellbeing and vulnerable narcissism with worse wellbeing. We also hypothesized that these associations would be explained by self-esteem and would be stronger in countries higher on individualism. First, as hypothesized, grandiose narcissism was associated with better wellbeing and vulnerable narcissism with worse wellbeing. Second, as hypothesized, both associations became nonsignificant after controlling for self-esteem, suggesting that they are explained by self-esteem. Third, partly as hypothesized, the association between grandiose-but not vulnerable-narcissism and wellbeing was stronger in more individualistic countries. Results held across wellbeing forms (hedonic, eudaimonic) and methods (cross-sectional, longitudinal). Advancing psychological theory, we demonstrated that only grandiose narcissists enjoy better wellbeing, especially in individualistic countries, a phenomenon accounted for by their higher self-esteem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自恋与幸福:一个跨文化的元分析。
自恋者的幸福感比其他人更好还是更差?心理学理论不同意。为了调和两者,我们进行了一项全面的跨文化荟萃分析,测试了浮夸型自恋会带来更好的幸福感,而脆弱型自恋会带来更差的幸福感的核心假设。我们还假设这些联系可以用自尊来解释,并且在个人主义程度较高的国家会更强。首先,正如假设的那样,浮夸型自恋与更好的幸福感有关,而脆弱型自恋与更差的幸福感有关。第二,正如假设的那样,在控制了自尊之后,这两种关联都变得不显著,这表明它们是由自尊来解释的。第三,在更个人主义的国家,浮夸而非脆弱的自恋与幸福感之间的联系更为强烈,这在一定程度上与假设相符。结果涵盖了不同的幸福形式(享乐的、快乐的)和方法(横断面的、纵向的)。推进心理学理论,我们证明了只有浮夸的自恋者才能享受更好的幸福,特别是在个人主义国家,这一现象可以解释为他们更高的自尊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
期刊最新文献
Shifts in Racial Inequalities and White Backlash in the 21st Century U.S. Alluring or Alarming? The Polarizing Effect of Forbidden Knowledge in Political Discourse. Deception Detection: Using Machine Learning to Analyze 911 Calls. Inoculating Against Moral Disengagement Creates Ethical Adherence for Narcissism. Why Life Moves Fast: Exploring the Mechanisms Behind Autobiographical Time Perception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1