Evaluation of interventions in prehospital and in-hospital settings and outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients meeting the termination of resuscitation rule in Japan: A nationwide database study (The JAAM-OHCA Registry)

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110530
Tadaharu Shiozumi , Tasuku Matsuyama , Norihiro Nishioka , Takeyuki Kiguchi , Tetsuhisa Kitamura , Bon Ohta , Taku Iwami
{"title":"Evaluation of interventions in prehospital and in-hospital settings and outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients meeting the termination of resuscitation rule in Japan: A nationwide database study (The JAAM-OHCA Registry)","authors":"Tadaharu Shiozumi ,&nbsp;Tasuku Matsuyama ,&nbsp;Norihiro Nishioka ,&nbsp;Takeyuki Kiguchi ,&nbsp;Tetsuhisa Kitamura ,&nbsp;Bon Ohta ,&nbsp;Taku Iwami","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global health burden with low survival rates. The termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule, widely adopted internationally, aims to preserve dignity, optimize resources, and protect healthcare providers. However, prehospital TOR is not implemented in Japan, presenting legal and practical challenges. This study analyzes temporal trends in prehospital and in-hospital interventions for OHCA patients with poor predicted outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (JAAM-OHCA) registry (June 2014–December 2021). Adult OHCA patients with medical causes were included if they fulfilled all the advanced life support (ALS) TOR rule criteria: unwitnessed arrest, no return of spontaneous circulation, no bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and no automated external defibrillator use or defibrillation. Prehospital and in-hospital interventions were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 11,334 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 2,447 received all three ALS interventions (advanced airway management, intravenous access, and epinephrine administration). Over time, in-hospital interventions, including endotracheal intubation (56%) and epinephrine administration (82%), decreased, while advanced therapies, including coronary angiography, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and targeted temperature management, remained rare (&lt;1%). The median time to TOR after hospital arrival shortened to 18 min. In contrast, prehospital epinephrine administration increased, while advanced airway management and intravenous access decreased.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OHCA patients who met TOR rule showed a decrease in in-hospital interventions. Further efforts are warranted to avoid futile medical treatments and promote patient-centered care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 110530"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957225000425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global health burden with low survival rates. The termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule, widely adopted internationally, aims to preserve dignity, optimize resources, and protect healthcare providers. However, prehospital TOR is not implemented in Japan, presenting legal and practical challenges. This study analyzes temporal trends in prehospital and in-hospital interventions for OHCA patients with poor predicted outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (JAAM-OHCA) registry (June 2014–December 2021). Adult OHCA patients with medical causes were included if they fulfilled all the advanced life support (ALS) TOR rule criteria: unwitnessed arrest, no return of spontaneous circulation, no bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and no automated external defibrillator use or defibrillation. Prehospital and in-hospital interventions were evaluated.

Results

Among 11,334 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 2,447 received all three ALS interventions (advanced airway management, intravenous access, and epinephrine administration). Over time, in-hospital interventions, including endotracheal intubation (56%) and epinephrine administration (82%), decreased, while advanced therapies, including coronary angiography, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and targeted temperature management, remained rare (<1%). The median time to TOR after hospital arrival shortened to 18 min. In contrast, prehospital epinephrine administration increased, while advanced airway management and intravenous access decreased.

Conclusions

OHCA patients who met TOR rule showed a decrease in in-hospital interventions. Further efforts are warranted to avoid futile medical treatments and promote patient-centered care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估院前和院内的干预措施以及院外心脏骤停患者符合复苏终止规则的结果:一项全国性数据库研究(JAAM-OHCA Registry)。
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)是一种低存活率的全球性健康负担。国际上广泛采用的终止复苏(TOR)规则旨在维护尊严、优化资源和保护医疗保健提供者。然而,院前TOR尚未在日本实施,这在法律和实践上都存在挑战。本研究分析了预测预后不良的OHCA患者院前和院内干预的时间趋势。方法:本回顾性研究分析了日本急性医学院外心脏骤停协会(JAAM-OHCA)登记(2014年6月至2021年12月)的数据。医学原因的成年OHCA患者如果符合所有高级生命支持(ALS) TOR规则标准:无目击骤停,无自发循环恢复,无旁观者启动的心肺复苏,无自动体外除颤器使用或除颤。评估院前和院内干预措施。结果:在11334例符合纳入标准的患者中,2447例接受了所有三种ALS干预措施(高级气道管理、静脉通路和肾上腺素给药)。随着时间的推移,包括气管插管(56%)和肾上腺素管理(82%)在内的院内干预措施减少,而包括冠状动脉造影、体外膜氧合和靶向温度管理在内的先进治疗方法仍然很少(结论:符合TOR规则的OHCA患者显示院内干预减少。有必要进一步努力避免无效的医疗,促进以病人为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
External Validation of Rules for Termination of Resuscitation in In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Impact of ghrelin treatment on neuro-biomarkers evolution after cardiac arrest: insights from an ancillary analysis of the GRECO trial The Impact of Tracheal Intubation Attempts on Chest Compression Fraction During Pediatric CPR: A Report from the Videography In Pediatric Resuscitation (VIPER) Collaborative When voice prompts are ignored: what non-adherence to AED instructions reveals about in-hospital resuscitation. The Association Between Early Arterial Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide with Neurologic Outcomes after Pediatric ECPR in Children with Cardiac Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1