Decision Aid for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis

Anna B. Fishbein MD, MS , Karen Kaiser PhD , Sarah B. Welch MPH , Catherina Lu BA , Jack Osborn BS , Jessica Thomas MA , Michelle Taddeo MPH , Hosanna An BA , Andie Kwon BSN , George Luong BS , Kenneth L. Zhang BS , Stephanie M. Rangel PhD , Amy S. Paller MD, MS , James W. Griffith PhD
{"title":"Decision Aid for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis","authors":"Anna B. Fishbein MD, MS ,&nbsp;Karen Kaiser PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah B. Welch MPH ,&nbsp;Catherina Lu BA ,&nbsp;Jack Osborn BS ,&nbsp;Jessica Thomas MA ,&nbsp;Michelle Taddeo MPH ,&nbsp;Hosanna An BA ,&nbsp;Andie Kwon BSN ,&nbsp;George Luong BS ,&nbsp;Kenneth L. Zhang BS ,&nbsp;Stephanie M. Rangel PhD ,&nbsp;Amy S. Paller MD, MS ,&nbsp;James W. Griffith PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.01.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Atopic dermatitis is a common chronic skin disease that involves frequent physician visits and often complex care plans. Despite the expanding therapeutic options, there is no existing decision aid to guide patients, families, and clinicians through treatment options.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our objective was to develop an evidence-based decision aid that would be widely accepted for shared decision-making in pediatric atopic dermatitis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Per rigorous International Patient Decision Aid Standards, the following steps were taken: (1) literature review; (2) focus groups with patients and caregivers; (3) expert interviews; (4) prototype creation, revision, and pilot testing in the clinic; and (5) further in-clinic testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six focus groups provided insight into patient/parent preferences (n = 32) regarding treatment experiences and preferences. Nine expert interviews revealed implementation strategies for shared decision-making, eliciting themes of communication, patient education, challenges to and supports for treatment adherence, useful materials/resources, and other strategies for success. Using content from literature review, patient/parent focus groups, and expert interviews, a draft decision aid was systematically created. Cognitive interviews (n = 10) with patients/parents resulted in tool refinement. In-clinic testing demonstrated that the tool was helpful; an average ± standard deviation score was 7.8 ± 1.7 (0-10 scale, n = 18). A final decision aid was produced.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A decision aid for children with atopic dermatitis can be used for clinical encounters and has the potential to improve patient/family engagement in decision-making. In addition, we include a worksheet on patient/parent values and an eczema action plan for implementation. Efficacy of this tool will be tested across populations in future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 915-922.e10"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219825001497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Atopic dermatitis is a common chronic skin disease that involves frequent physician visits and often complex care plans. Despite the expanding therapeutic options, there is no existing decision aid to guide patients, families, and clinicians through treatment options.

Objective

Our objective was to develop an evidence-based decision aid that would be widely accepted for shared decision-making in pediatric atopic dermatitis.

Methods

Per rigorous International Patient Decision Aid Standards, the following steps were taken: (1) literature review; (2) focus groups with patients and caregivers; (3) expert interviews; (4) prototype creation, revision, and pilot testing in the clinic; and (5) further in-clinic testing.

Results

Six focus groups provided insight into patient/parent preferences (n = 32) regarding treatment experiences and preferences. Nine expert interviews revealed implementation strategies for shared decision-making, eliciting themes of communication, patient education, challenges to and supports for treatment adherence, useful materials/resources, and other strategies for success. Using content from literature review, patient/parent focus groups, and expert interviews, a draft decision aid was systematically created. Cognitive interviews (n = 10) with patients/parents resulted in tool refinement. In-clinic testing demonstrated that the tool was helpful; an average ± standard deviation score was 7.8 ± 1.7 (0-10 scale, n = 18). A final decision aid was produced.

Conclusions

A decision aid for children with atopic dermatitis can be used for clinical encounters and has the potential to improve patient/family engagement in decision-making. In addition, we include a worksheet on patient/parent values and an eczema action plan for implementation. Efficacy of this tool will be tested across populations in future studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童特应性皮炎的决策辅助。
背景:特应性皮炎是一种常见的慢性皮肤病,需要频繁的医生就诊和复杂的护理计划。尽管有越来越多的治疗选择,但没有现有的决策辅助工具来指导患者、家属和临床医生选择治疗方案。目的:我们的目标是开发一种基于证据的决策辅助工具,该辅助工具将被广泛接受,用于儿科特应性皮炎的共同决策。方法:根据严格的国际患者决策辅助标准(IPDAS),采取以下步骤:1)文献回顾;2)患者和护理人员焦点小组;3)专家访谈;4)原型制作、修改、临床中试;5)临床测试。结果:六个焦点小组提供了关于治疗经历和偏好的患者/家长偏好的见解(n=32)。9位专家访谈揭示了共同决策的实施策略,引出了沟通、患者教育、对治疗依从性的挑战和支持、有用的材料/资源以及其他成功策略等主题。利用文献综述、患者/家长焦点小组和专家访谈的内容,系统地创建了一份决策援助草案。与患者/家长的认知访谈(n=10)导致了工具的改进。临床测试表明该工具是有帮助的,满分10分,平均±SD评分为7.8±1.7 (n=18)。产生了最后的决策援助。结论:特应性皮炎患儿的决策辅助系统可用于临床就诊,并有可能提高患者/家庭对决策的参与。此外,我们还包括一份关于患者/父母价值的工作表和湿疹行动计划的实施。在未来的研究中,该工具的有效性将在人群中进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Asthma and higher social isolation among middle-aged adults: A structural equation analysis of nationwide data in India. Vocal Cord Dysfunction / Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction (VCD/ILO) as a mimic of anaphylaxis: A retrospective cohort study. Efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids in NAVIGATOR. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following repeat dosing of neffy (epinephrine nasal spray) versus intramuscular injection during induced allergic rhinitis. Allergy Misinformation Across Social Media Platforms: Content Analysis and Public Response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1