Long-Term Effectiveness of a Digital Inhaler on Medication Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Asthma Patients in Primary Care: The Cluster Randomized Controlled ACCEPTANCE Trial

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2025.03.013
Susanne J. van de Hei MD, PhD , Liselot N. van den Berg MSc , Charlotte C. Poot PhD , Yoran H. Gerritsma PhD , Eline Meijer PhD , Bertine M.J. Flokstra-de Blok PhD , Maarten J. Postma PhD , Job F.M. van Boven PharmD, PhD , Niels H. Chavannes MD, PhD , Janwillem W.H. Kocks MD, PhD
{"title":"Long-Term Effectiveness of a Digital Inhaler on Medication Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Asthma Patients in Primary Care: The Cluster Randomized Controlled ACCEPTANCE Trial","authors":"Susanne J. van de Hei MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Liselot N. van den Berg MSc ,&nbsp;Charlotte C. Poot PhD ,&nbsp;Yoran H. Gerritsma PhD ,&nbsp;Eline Meijer PhD ,&nbsp;Bertine M.J. Flokstra-de Blok PhD ,&nbsp;Maarten J. Postma PhD ,&nbsp;Job F.M. van Boven PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Niels H. Chavannes MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Janwillem W.H. Kocks MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Digital inhalers can support medication adherence and asthma control in the short-term. Yet, long-term benefits are unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the clinical effects, usability, and cost-effectiveness of a digital inhaler.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was an open-label cluster randomized controlled trial of 12 months in Dutch primary care. Adults with suboptimal controlled asthma and nonadherence were eligible. General practices were randomly allocated to either intervention or control, stratified by practice size. Intervention and control patients received an electronic monitoring device attached to their budesonide/formoterol SYMBICORT Turbuhaler maintenance inhaler. Intervention patients used a smartphone application for data insights and reminders. Control patients’ inhaler use was passively monitored. Primary outcome was 1-year medication adherence. Secondary outcomes included asthma control, quality of life, usability, and cost-effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between June 27, 2019 and September 30, 2022, 136 clusters containing 164 participants were randomized (82 participants across 68 clusters in both groups). Estimated marginal means (EMM) for medication adherence were 71.4% (95% CI, 67.1-75.4) and 59.9% (95% CI, 55.0-64.7) in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Medication adherence was higher in the intervention group at week 2 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.63-2.95). The difference in medication adherence between groups declined over time (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001); no significant difference was found at study end (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.91-1.66). Overall, Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 scores were significantly better (<em>P</em> = .0056) in the intervention group (EMM, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18-1.44) compared with control (EMM, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.44-1.68). Quality of life (Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores) did not differ significantly between groups (<em>P</em> = .0530). However, the intervention group was almost three times more likely to reach the minimal clinically important difference for asthma-related quality of life (OR = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.02-7.54). Mean system usability score was 80.1 (SD, 13.8). Cost per 0.5-point Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 decrease was €278.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Use of this digital inhaler led to significant improvements in medication adherence in the short term and to sustained improved asthma control over 12 months.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"13 7","pages":"Pages 1693-1704"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219825002600","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Digital inhalers can support medication adherence and asthma control in the short-term. Yet, long-term benefits are unknown.

Objective

To investigate the clinical effects, usability, and cost-effectiveness of a digital inhaler.

Methods

This was an open-label cluster randomized controlled trial of 12 months in Dutch primary care. Adults with suboptimal controlled asthma and nonadherence were eligible. General practices were randomly allocated to either intervention or control, stratified by practice size. Intervention and control patients received an electronic monitoring device attached to their budesonide/formoterol SYMBICORT Turbuhaler maintenance inhaler. Intervention patients used a smartphone application for data insights and reminders. Control patients’ inhaler use was passively monitored. Primary outcome was 1-year medication adherence. Secondary outcomes included asthma control, quality of life, usability, and cost-effectiveness.

Results

Between June 27, 2019 and September 30, 2022, 136 clusters containing 164 participants were randomized (82 participants across 68 clusters in both groups). Estimated marginal means (EMM) for medication adherence were 71.4% (95% CI, 67.1-75.4) and 59.9% (95% CI, 55.0-64.7) in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Medication adherence was higher in the intervention group at week 2 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.63-2.95). The difference in medication adherence between groups declined over time (P < .0001); no significant difference was found at study end (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.91-1.66). Overall, Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 scores were significantly better (P = .0056) in the intervention group (EMM, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18-1.44) compared with control (EMM, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.44-1.68). Quality of life (Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores) did not differ significantly between groups (P = .0530). However, the intervention group was almost three times more likely to reach the minimal clinically important difference for asthma-related quality of life (OR = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.02-7.54). Mean system usability score was 80.1 (SD, 13.8). Cost per 0.5-point Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 decrease was €278.

Conclusion

Use of this digital inhaler led to significant improvements in medication adherence in the short term and to sustained improved asthma control over 12 months.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字吸入器对初级保健成人哮喘患者药物依从性和临床结局的长期有效性:聚类随机对照接受试验
背景:数字吸入器可在短期内帮助坚持用药和控制哮喘。然而,其长期益处尚不可知:调查数字吸入器的临床效果、可用性和成本效益:方法:在荷兰基层医疗机构开展为期 12 个月的开放标签群组随机对照试验。符合条件的患者均为哮喘控制不佳且未坚持治疗的成年人。根据诊所规模,将普通诊所随机分配到干预或对照诊所。干预组和对照组患者的布地奈德/福莫特罗欣必可特® Turbuhaler® 维持吸入器都安装了电子监测装置。干预患者使用智能手机应用程序了解数据并接收提醒。对照组患者的吸入器使用情况受到被动监测。主要结果是一年的用药依从性。次要结果包括哮喘控制、生活质量、可用性和成本效益:在 2019 年 6 月 27 日至 2022 年 9 月 30 日期间,136 个群组的 164 名参与者接受了随机治疗(两组均有 82 名参与者,分布在 68 个群组中)。干预组和对照组的用药依从性估计边际平均值(EMM)分别为71.4%(95%CI:67.1-75.4)和59.9%(95%CI:55.0-64.7)。干预组在第二周的服药依从性更高(OR:2.19,95%CI:1.63-2.95)。随着时间的推移,干预组与对照组在用药依从性方面的差异逐渐减小(p 结论:使用这种数字吸入器可提高患者的用药依从性:使用这种数字吸入器可在短期内显著改善用药依从性,并在12个月内持续改善哮喘控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Clinical evolution of acute urticaria and association with IgE autoantibodies. Teff allergy in children with regular household exposure. Sunflower seed allergy: Natural history, oral food challenge outcomes, and review of the literature. Refractory Orbital Kimura Disease Successfully Treated With Dupilumab. Attitudes and practices regarding dosing interval extension of biologics in severe asthma: a nationwide survey and real-world data from the Dutch RAPSODI registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1