Long-term effectiveness of a digital inhaler on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in adult asthma patients in primary care: the cluster randomised controlled ACCEPTANCE trial.
Susanne J van de Hei, Liselot N van den Berg, Charlotte C Poot, Yoran H Gerritsma, Eline Meijer, Bertine M J Flokstra-de Blok, Maarten J Postma, Job F M van Boven, Niels H Chavannes, Janwillem W H Kocks
{"title":"Long-term effectiveness of a digital inhaler on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in adult asthma patients in primary care: the cluster randomised controlled ACCEPTANCE trial.","authors":"Susanne J van de Hei, Liselot N van den Berg, Charlotte C Poot, Yoran H Gerritsma, Eline Meijer, Bertine M J Flokstra-de Blok, Maarten J Postma, Job F M van Boven, Niels H Chavannes, Janwillem W H Kocks","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital inhalers can support medication adherence and asthma control in the short-term. Yet, long-term benefits are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical effects, usability, and cost-effectiveness of a digital inhaler.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Open-label cluster randomised controlled trial of twelve months in Dutch primary care. Adults with suboptimal controlled asthma and non-adherence were eligible. General practices were randomly allocated to either intervention or control, stratified by practice size. Intervention and control patients received an electronic monitoring device attached to their budesonide/formoterol Symbicort® Turbuhaler® maintenance inhaler. Intervention patients used a smartphone application for data insights and reminders. Control patients' inhaler usage was passively monitored. Primary outcome was 1-year medication adherence. Secondary outcomesincluded asthma control, quality of life, usability and cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 27, 2019 and September 30, 2022, 136 clusters containing 164 participants were randomised (82 participants across 68 clusters in both groups). Estimated marginal means (EMM) for medication adherence were 71.4% (95%CI:67.1-75.4) and 59.9% (95%CI:55.0-64.7) in the intervention and control group, respectively. Medication adherence was higher in the intervention group at week 2 (OR:2.19, 95%CI:1.63-2.95). The difference in medication adherence between groups declined over time (p<0.0001); no significant difference was found at study end (OR:1.23, 95%CI:0.91-1.66). Overall, ACQ-5 scores were significantly better (p=0.0056) in the intervention group (EMM:1.31, 95%CI:1.18-1.44) compared with control (EMM:1.56, 95%CI:1.44-1.68). Quality of life (Mini-AQLQ scores) differed not significantly between groups (p=0.0530), however, the intervention group was almost three times more likely to reach the MCID for asthma-related quality of life (OR:2.73, 95%CI:1.02-7.54). Mean System Usability Score was 80.1 (SD:13.8). Cost per 0.5-point ACQ-5 decrease was €278.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of this digital inhaler led to significant improvements in medication adherence in the short-term and to sustained improved asthma control over twelve months.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.03.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Digital inhalers can support medication adherence and asthma control in the short-term. Yet, long-term benefits are unknown.
Objective: To investigate the clinical effects, usability, and cost-effectiveness of a digital inhaler.
Methods: Open-label cluster randomised controlled trial of twelve months in Dutch primary care. Adults with suboptimal controlled asthma and non-adherence were eligible. General practices were randomly allocated to either intervention or control, stratified by practice size. Intervention and control patients received an electronic monitoring device attached to their budesonide/formoterol Symbicort® Turbuhaler® maintenance inhaler. Intervention patients used a smartphone application for data insights and reminders. Control patients' inhaler usage was passively monitored. Primary outcome was 1-year medication adherence. Secondary outcomesincluded asthma control, quality of life, usability and cost-effectiveness.
Results: Between June 27, 2019 and September 30, 2022, 136 clusters containing 164 participants were randomised (82 participants across 68 clusters in both groups). Estimated marginal means (EMM) for medication adherence were 71.4% (95%CI:67.1-75.4) and 59.9% (95%CI:55.0-64.7) in the intervention and control group, respectively. Medication adherence was higher in the intervention group at week 2 (OR:2.19, 95%CI:1.63-2.95). The difference in medication adherence between groups declined over time (p<0.0001); no significant difference was found at study end (OR:1.23, 95%CI:0.91-1.66). Overall, ACQ-5 scores were significantly better (p=0.0056) in the intervention group (EMM:1.31, 95%CI:1.18-1.44) compared with control (EMM:1.56, 95%CI:1.44-1.68). Quality of life (Mini-AQLQ scores) differed not significantly between groups (p=0.0530), however, the intervention group was almost three times more likely to reach the MCID for asthma-related quality of life (OR:2.73, 95%CI:1.02-7.54). Mean System Usability Score was 80.1 (SD:13.8). Cost per 0.5-point ACQ-5 decrease was €278.
Conclusion: Use of this digital inhaler led to significant improvements in medication adherence in the short-term and to sustained improved asthma control over twelve months.
期刊介绍：
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
