Inflammatory Biomarkers from Blood Counts as Prognostic Tools in Metastatic Esophageal Cancer.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Medical Science Monitor Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.12659/MSM.947202
Yonca Yılmaz Ürün, İsmail Beypınar
{"title":"Inflammatory Biomarkers from Blood Counts as Prognostic Tools in Metastatic Esophageal Cancer.","authors":"Yonca Yılmaz Ürün, İsmail Beypınar","doi":"10.12659/MSM.947202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Globally, esophageal cancer ranks as the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality. This retrospective study from a single center in Turkey aimed to evaluate hematological inflammatory biomarkers in complete blood count (CBC) data and outcomes in 113 patients with advanced esophageal carcinomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 113 patients with metastatic esophageal cancer composed of squamous (92), adenocarcinoma (18), and small cell (3) histology. We investigated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-platelet lymphocyte ratio (NLPR), neutrophile-to-monocyte ratio (NMR), systemic inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) in terms of prognosis. RESULTS The initial treatment for 25.7% of patients consisted of a carboplatin-paclitaxel combination. In response to the initial round of chemotherapy, 52.2% of patients showed improvement (15% complete, 37.2% partial), while 18.6% experienced disease progression. Neutropenia was observed as the most prevalent severe (grades 3-4) adverse reaction, affecting 19.8% of patients. Higher NLR, PLR, SII, NLPR, SIRI, and AISI values were associated with worse survival (P=0.016, P=0.008, P=0.011, P=0.028, P=0.014, P=0.001, respectively), whereas higher LMR was correlated with better survival (P=0.001). The NMR analysis showed no significant association (P=0.46). Multivariate analysis identified independent prognostic factors except histology, PLR, and NLPR. CONCLUSIONS Research indicates that inflammatory indicators obtained from complete blood count analyses possess prognostic significance for individuals with metastatic esophageal cancer. These biomarkers demonstrate diverse capacities in forecasting the course of the disease. These simple and inexpensive markers need further confirmation to guide individualized treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"31 ","pages":"e947202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.947202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Globally, esophageal cancer ranks as the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality. This retrospective study from a single center in Turkey aimed to evaluate hematological inflammatory biomarkers in complete blood count (CBC) data and outcomes in 113 patients with advanced esophageal carcinomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 113 patients with metastatic esophageal cancer composed of squamous (92), adenocarcinoma (18), and small cell (3) histology. We investigated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-platelet lymphocyte ratio (NLPR), neutrophile-to-monocyte ratio (NMR), systemic inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) in terms of prognosis. RESULTS The initial treatment for 25.7% of patients consisted of a carboplatin-paclitaxel combination. In response to the initial round of chemotherapy, 52.2% of patients showed improvement (15% complete, 37.2% partial), while 18.6% experienced disease progression. Neutropenia was observed as the most prevalent severe (grades 3-4) adverse reaction, affecting 19.8% of patients. Higher NLR, PLR, SII, NLPR, SIRI, and AISI values were associated with worse survival (P=0.016, P=0.008, P=0.011, P=0.028, P=0.014, P=0.001, respectively), whereas higher LMR was correlated with better survival (P=0.001). The NMR analysis showed no significant association (P=0.46). Multivariate analysis identified independent prognostic factors except histology, PLR, and NLPR. CONCLUSIONS Research indicates that inflammatory indicators obtained from complete blood count analyses possess prognostic significance for individuals with metastatic esophageal cancer. These biomarkers demonstrate diverse capacities in forecasting the course of the disease. These simple and inexpensive markers need further confirmation to guide individualized treatment planning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自血液计数的炎症生物标志物作为转移性食管癌的预后工具。
在全球范围内,食管癌是癌症相关死亡的第六大原因。这项来自土耳其单一中心的回顾性研究旨在评估113例晚期食管癌患者全血细胞计数(CBC)数据和结果中的血液学炎症生物标志物。材料和方法我们对113例转移性食管癌患者进行了回顾性分析,包括鳞状(92)、腺癌(18)和小细胞(3)组织学。我们在预后方面研究了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比率(LMR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)、中性粒细胞与血小板淋巴细胞比率(NLPR)、中性粒细胞与单核细胞比率(NMR)、全身炎症指数(SII)、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)和全身炎症综合指数(AISI)。结果25.7%的患者采用卡铂-紫杉醇联合治疗。在首轮化疗中,52.2%的患者表现出改善(15%完全,37.2%部分),而18.6%的患者出现疾病进展。中性粒细胞减少是最常见的严重不良反应(3-4级),影响19.8%的患者。较高的NLR、PLR、SII、NLPR、SIRI和AISI值与较差的生存率相关(P=0.016, P=0.008, P=0.011, P=0.028, P=0.014, P=0.001),而较高的LMR与较好的生存率相关(P=0.001)。核磁共振分析显示无显著相关性(P=0.46)。多变量分析确定了除组织学、PLR和NLPR外的独立预后因素。结论:研究表明,全血细胞计数分析获得的炎症指标对转移性食管癌患者具有预后意义。这些生物标志物在预测疾病进程方面表现出不同的能力。这些简单而廉价的标记物需要进一步确认以指导个体化治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Implications and Limitations of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Detecting Fetal Copy Number Variations: A Multicenter Study in Shaanxi Province, China. Kantianism, Intercultural Differences, and Attitudes Toward Organ Donation Among First-Year Nursing Students. Core-Out Fistulectomy Combined With Laser Ablation of the Trans-Sphincteric Fistula Tract: A Pilot Study of Efficacy and Safety. Prognostic Value of HALP and PNI Scores in Predicting 6-Month Mortality Among Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients. Editorial: Recently Identified Global Trends in Cancer Incidence and Mortality and Modifiable Cancer Risk Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1