Folic acid supplementation in children with sickle cell disease: A randomized double-blind non-inferiority crossover trial.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.001
Brock A Williams, Heather McCartney, Joel Singer, Angela M Devlin, Suzanne Vercauteren, Ali Amid, John K Wu, Crystal D Karakochuk
{"title":"Folic acid supplementation in children with sickle cell disease: A randomized double-blind non-inferiority crossover trial.","authors":"Brock A Williams, Heather McCartney, Joel Singer, Angela M Devlin, Suzanne Vercauteren, Ali Amid, John K Wu, Crystal D Karakochuk","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with sickle cell disease in Canada are routinely supplemented with folic acid to provide sufficient folate for the increased demands of erythropoiesis. However, with mandatory folic acid fortification of refined grains and pharmacotherapies which extend the lifespan of sickled red blood cells (RBC), this clinical practice is in question.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the efficacy of folic acid supplementation by measuring the effect of 12±1 weeks of 1mg/d folic acid, compared to placebo, on concentrations of RBC folate (primary outcome), serum folate and one-carbon-related metabolites, and clinical outcomes in children with SCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind randomized controlled non-inferiority crossover trial, 31 children with sickle cell disease, aged 2-19 years, were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1 with blocks of 4) to 1mg/d folic acid, the current standard of care, or a placebo for 12±1 weeks. Following a 12±1 week washout period, treatments were reversed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (95% CI) difference in endline RBC folate concentrations across treatments was -179 (-260, -99) nmol/L, with the lower boundary of the confidence interval exceeding non-inferiority but the upper boundary not (p=0.0001; modified intention-to-treat). There was no significant difference in the number of participants who had RBC folate deficiency after each treatment (p=0.059). No participants presented with serum folate deficiency (<7 nmol/L). There were no significant differences observed in one-carbon metabolite concentrations (total homocysteine, S-adenosylhomocysteine, S-adenosylmethionine, vitamin B12, or methylmalonic acid), hematological measures, nor clinical outcomes (specifically acute pain episodes or megaloblastic changes) when individuals were supplemented with folic acid in comparison to placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite mandatory food fortification and advances in the medical treatment of sickle cell disease, it appears that some children with this condition may still benefit from daily folic acid supplementation. Whether this translates to improved clinical outcomes remains uncertain. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04011345 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04011345).</p>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with sickle cell disease in Canada are routinely supplemented with folic acid to provide sufficient folate for the increased demands of erythropoiesis. However, with mandatory folic acid fortification of refined grains and pharmacotherapies which extend the lifespan of sickled red blood cells (RBC), this clinical practice is in question.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of folic acid supplementation by measuring the effect of 12±1 weeks of 1mg/d folic acid, compared to placebo, on concentrations of RBC folate (primary outcome), serum folate and one-carbon-related metabolites, and clinical outcomes in children with SCD.

Methods: In this double-blind randomized controlled non-inferiority crossover trial, 31 children with sickle cell disease, aged 2-19 years, were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1 with blocks of 4) to 1mg/d folic acid, the current standard of care, or a placebo for 12±1 weeks. Following a 12±1 week washout period, treatments were reversed.

Results: The mean (95% CI) difference in endline RBC folate concentrations across treatments was -179 (-260, -99) nmol/L, with the lower boundary of the confidence interval exceeding non-inferiority but the upper boundary not (p=0.0001; modified intention-to-treat). There was no significant difference in the number of participants who had RBC folate deficiency after each treatment (p=0.059). No participants presented with serum folate deficiency (<7 nmol/L). There were no significant differences observed in one-carbon metabolite concentrations (total homocysteine, S-adenosylhomocysteine, S-adenosylmethionine, vitamin B12, or methylmalonic acid), hematological measures, nor clinical outcomes (specifically acute pain episodes or megaloblastic changes) when individuals were supplemented with folic acid in comparison to placebo.

Conclusions: Despite mandatory food fortification and advances in the medical treatment of sickle cell disease, it appears that some children with this condition may still benefit from daily folic acid supplementation. Whether this translates to improved clinical outcomes remains uncertain. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04011345 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04011345).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Diet and survival after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Folic acid supplementation in children with sickle cell disease: A randomized double-blind non-inferiority crossover trial. Impact of Formula Protein Quantity and Source on Infant Metabolism: Serum, Urine and Fecal Metabolomes of a Randomized Controlled Study. Adipose tissue content of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and all-cause mortality: a Danish prospective cohort study. Editorial board/publication information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1