Rabies in humans: a treatment approach.

IF 6.3 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102813
Cornelis A De Pijper, Pieter P A M van Thiel, Diederik van de Beek, Matthijs C Brouwer, Eleonora Aronica, Nicole P Juffermans, Ron A A Mathôt, Corine H GeurtsvanKessel, Janke Schinkel, Menno D de Jong, Martin P Grobusch, Abraham Goorhuis
{"title":"Rabies in humans: a treatment approach.","authors":"Cornelis A De Pijper, Pieter P A M van Thiel, Diederik van de Beek, Matthijs C Brouwer, Eleonora Aronica, Nicole P Juffermans, Ron A A Mathôt, Corine H GeurtsvanKessel, Janke Schinkel, Menno D de Jong, Martin P Grobusch, Abraham Goorhuis","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Only few rabies survivors have been described in the medical literature, of whom most suffered severe neurological sequelae. Published treatment protocols have not been applied successfully. Yet, experimental treatments may be of benefit when factors associated with survival are present. Here, we describe two patients who were hospitalised at Amsterdam UMC with clinical rabies and who died despite experimental treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe the clinical course and medical decisions in the treatment of two rabies patients at our hospital and compared this approach with published data on the treatment of clinical rabies, depending on the presence or absence of prognostic factors associated with survival, and regarded this information in the context of clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most important factor associated with survival - the presence of high antibody titres in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at the time of diagnosis - was not present in either of the two cases at our hospital. In addition to supportive treatment, both of our patients were treated unsuccesfully with a novel treatment approach with intrathecal and intravenous monoclonal rabies antibodies, which barely increased serum and CSF antibody levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher-dosed treatments with monoclonal antibodies in serum may be needed to yield an effect. Any experimental treatment may be most promising in patients who have other factors associated with survival. In the absence of these, initiation of palliative care still seems to remain the most rational strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"102813"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Only few rabies survivors have been described in the medical literature, of whom most suffered severe neurological sequelae. Published treatment protocols have not been applied successfully. Yet, experimental treatments may be of benefit when factors associated with survival are present. Here, we describe two patients who were hospitalised at Amsterdam UMC with clinical rabies and who died despite experimental treatments.

Methods: We describe the clinical course and medical decisions in the treatment of two rabies patients at our hospital and compared this approach with published data on the treatment of clinical rabies, depending on the presence or absence of prognostic factors associated with survival, and regarded this information in the context of clinical practice.

Results: The most important factor associated with survival - the presence of high antibody titres in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at the time of diagnosis - was not present in either of the two cases at our hospital. In addition to supportive treatment, both of our patients were treated unsuccesfully with a novel treatment approach with intrathecal and intravenous monoclonal rabies antibodies, which barely increased serum and CSF antibody levels.

Conclusions: Higher-dosed treatments with monoclonal antibodies in serum may be needed to yield an effect. Any experimental treatment may be most promising in patients who have other factors associated with survival. In the absence of these, initiation of palliative care still seems to remain the most rational strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease Publication Scope: Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine Focus Areas: Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections Malaria prevention and treatment Travellers' diarrhoea Infections associated with mass gatherings Migration-related infections Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners Coverage: Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease Publication Features: Offers a fast peer-review process Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts Aims to publish cutting-edge papers
期刊最新文献
A case of imported Plasmodium malariae infection after treated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: Possible explanations and a review of the literature Rabies in humans: a treatment approach. Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus screening among African individuals in Spain: Lessons to learn Travellers’ adherence to atovaquone/proguanil malaria chemoprophylaxis after return from endemic areas Differences between Influenza H5N1, A/H1N1 2009, and SARS-CoV-2 in a pandemic risk scenario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1