The implementation of eras in Belgian esophageal surgery centers.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1007/s13304-025-02063-x
Yaliva Dorreman, Hanne Vanommeslaeghe, Piet Pattyn, Claude Bertrand, Lieven Depypere, Hans Van Veer, Philippe Nafteux, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Elke Van Daele
{"title":"The implementation of eras in Belgian esophageal surgery centers.","authors":"Yaliva Dorreman, Hanne Vanommeslaeghe, Piet Pattyn, Claude Bertrand, Lieven Depypere, Hans Van Veer, Philippe Nafteux, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Elke Van Daele","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02063-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophagectomy for cancer is a highly invasive procedure with significant post-operative morbidity and mortality. The literature suggests a clear volume outcome correlation. Since 2019, esophageal surgery has been centralized in Belgium. In 2019, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines were published for esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of implementation of these ERAS guidelines in Belgium. Surgeons from centralized esophageal surgery centers in Belgium were questioned. A Delphi questionnaire regarding peri-operative ERAS care and center-specific outcome data were sent to all participating surgeons. An ERAS scoring system was created to estimate and compare the level of ERAS implementation. Length of stay, post-operative pneumonia, anastomotic leakage and 30-day and 90-day mortality were evaluated. A high response rate of 94.1% was achieved. All surgeons used a peri-operative protocol in their center. The mean ERAS score for Belgian surgeons was 15.5 out of 20. The highest ERAS score per center is 18.6. Anastomotic leakage rate is 14.6% and post-operative pneumonia rate is 20.8% in Belgium. The mean length of stay is 12 days. Mortality after 30 days and 90 days are, respectively, 3.2% and 6.6%. This study gives an overview of the Belgian situation regarding the implementation of ERAS protocols in esophageal surgery centers. The overall implementation of ERAS guidelines in Belgium is good, but there is room for improvement in terms of uniformity nationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02063-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Esophagectomy for cancer is a highly invasive procedure with significant post-operative morbidity and mortality. The literature suggests a clear volume outcome correlation. Since 2019, esophageal surgery has been centralized in Belgium. In 2019, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines were published for esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of implementation of these ERAS guidelines in Belgium. Surgeons from centralized esophageal surgery centers in Belgium were questioned. A Delphi questionnaire regarding peri-operative ERAS care and center-specific outcome data were sent to all participating surgeons. An ERAS scoring system was created to estimate and compare the level of ERAS implementation. Length of stay, post-operative pneumonia, anastomotic leakage and 30-day and 90-day mortality were evaluated. A high response rate of 94.1% was achieved. All surgeons used a peri-operative protocol in their center. The mean ERAS score for Belgian surgeons was 15.5 out of 20. The highest ERAS score per center is 18.6. Anastomotic leakage rate is 14.6% and post-operative pneumonia rate is 20.8% in Belgium. The mean length of stay is 12 days. Mortality after 30 days and 90 days are, respectively, 3.2% and 6.6%. This study gives an overview of the Belgian situation regarding the implementation of ERAS protocols in esophageal surgery centers. The overall implementation of ERAS guidelines in Belgium is good, but there is room for improvement in terms of uniformity nationally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
期刊最新文献
The role of the comprehensive complication index in the prediction of tumor-related death in transplanted patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgical techniques using low-power monopolar scissors in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. LapAppendectomy4all: validation of a new methodology for laparoscopic appendectomy simulation and training. The implementation of eras in Belgian esophageal surgery centers. Voiding dysfunction after surgery for colorectal deep infiltrating endometriosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1