Chlorhexidine for ocular antisepsis before intravitreal injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Survey of ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.013
Charles Zhang, Daniel Lai, Daniel Zhu, Charles Palka, Andrew Reynolds, Nicolas Yannuzzi
{"title":"Chlorhexidine for ocular antisepsis before intravitreal injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Charles Zhang, Daniel Lai, Daniel Zhu, Charles Palka, Andrew Reynolds, Nicolas Yannuzzi","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Povidone-iodine (PI) is the gold standard for pre-intravitreal injection ocular antisepsis. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is an emerging alternative with less ocular irritation. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate post-injection endophthalmitis rates with the use of CHX compared to PI. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed for studies published between January 1, 2000 and February 21, 2024. Data on the number of injections and endophthalmitis cases were analyzed. A sample-size weighted mean difference (MD) meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Five studies including 230,656 injections were pooled to determine an endophthalmitis rate of 0.0003 [95 % CI, 0.0001-0.0005] with preinjection CHX antisepsis. Three studies included an additional PI branch and thus were used for secondary meta-analysis comparing CHX against PI. The analysis consisted of 185,799 injections in the CHX group and 269,441 injections in the PI group. No significant difference in the weighted relative risk of endophthalmitis with CHX was found (RR = 1.27 [95 %CI 0.50-3.22], p = 0.62). A total of 24 and 31 cases of culture-positivity were recorded in the CHX and PI groups respectively but no significant difference in weighted means was found (RR = 1.42[95 %CI 0.96-2.12], p = 0.08). This meta-analysis disclosed that the rate of post-IVI endophthalmitis while using CHX antisepsis is approximately 1 in 3937 injections, compared to 1 in 3906 with PI. CHX was not associated with a significant difference in the rate of endophthalmitis or culture-positivity compared to PI.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Povidone-iodine (PI) is the gold standard for pre-intravitreal injection ocular antisepsis. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is an emerging alternative with less ocular irritation. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate post-injection endophthalmitis rates with the use of CHX compared to PI. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed for studies published between January 1, 2000 and February 21, 2024. Data on the number of injections and endophthalmitis cases were analyzed. A sample-size weighted mean difference (MD) meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Five studies including 230,656 injections were pooled to determine an endophthalmitis rate of 0.0003 [95 % CI, 0.0001-0.0005] with preinjection CHX antisepsis. Three studies included an additional PI branch and thus were used for secondary meta-analysis comparing CHX against PI. The analysis consisted of 185,799 injections in the CHX group and 269,441 injections in the PI group. No significant difference in the weighted relative risk of endophthalmitis with CHX was found (RR = 1.27 [95 %CI 0.50-3.22], p = 0.62). A total of 24 and 31 cases of culture-positivity were recorded in the CHX and PI groups respectively but no significant difference in weighted means was found (RR = 1.42[95 %CI 0.96-2.12], p = 0.08). This meta-analysis disclosed that the rate of post-IVI endophthalmitis while using CHX antisepsis is approximately 1 in 3937 injections, compared to 1 in 3906 with PI. CHX was not associated with a significant difference in the rate of endophthalmitis or culture-positivity compared to PI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Ocular-Induced Abnormal Head Postures: A Systematic Review and Analysis. Pharmacological associations of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Looking beyond corticosteroids. Chlorhexidine for ocular antisepsis before intravitreal injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. REPLY: A Major Review on Punctal Stenosis: Updated Anatomy, Epidemiology, Etiopathology, and Clinical Presentation. Global demographic and etiological variations of retinal vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis: International Uveitis Study Group (IUSG) Retinal Vasculitis Study (ReViSe) Report 1.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1