Pharmacological therapy for relieving pain in panretinal photocoagulation: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Survey of ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.018
Mateus Pimenta Arruda, Sara Hira, Rian Vilar Lima, Larissa Irigoyen Teixeira Barbosa, Mariana Tosato Zinher, Lubna Al-Sharif, João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira, Giulia Steuernagel Del Valle
{"title":"Pharmacological therapy for relieving pain in panretinal photocoagulation: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Mateus Pimenta Arruda, Sara Hira, Rian Vilar Lima, Larissa Irigoyen Teixeira Barbosa, Mariana Tosato Zinher, Lubna Al-Sharif, João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira, Giulia Steuernagel Del Valle","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of analgesics and anesthetics used for lowering pain of panretinal photocoagulation. We carried out a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess pharmacological interventions for relieving pain in patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). We included 15 randomized controlled trials and 4 crossover trials with a total of 1787 eyes and 45.83 % of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 55 years. 2 % peribulbar lidocaine was the only significant treatment compared to placebo (MD -2.4 (95 % CrI -4.7 to -0.20). The rank probability and SUCRA also revealed 2 % peribulbar lidocaine (0.887) as the best treatment in terms of lowering the pain scores followed by etoricoxib (0.809) and potassium diclofenac (0.727). Two per cent peribulbar lidocaine is effective for reducing procedural pain in laser treatment compared to systemic and topical medications. Future studies should evaluate drugs that can reach and act on the posterior segment of the eye.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of analgesics and anesthetics used for lowering pain of panretinal photocoagulation. We carried out a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess pharmacological interventions for relieving pain in patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). We included 15 randomized controlled trials and 4 crossover trials with a total of 1787 eyes and 45.83 % of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 55 years. 2 % peribulbar lidocaine was the only significant treatment compared to placebo (MD -2.4 (95 % CrI -4.7 to -0.20). The rank probability and SUCRA also revealed 2 % peribulbar lidocaine (0.887) as the best treatment in terms of lowering the pain scores followed by etoricoxib (0.809) and potassium diclofenac (0.727). Two per cent peribulbar lidocaine is effective for reducing procedural pain in laser treatment compared to systemic and topical medications. Future studies should evaluate drugs that can reach and act on the posterior segment of the eye.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Ocular-Induced Abnormal Head Postures: A Systematic Review and Analysis. Pharmacological associations of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Looking beyond corticosteroids. Chlorhexidine for ocular antisepsis before intravitreal injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. REPLY: A Major Review on Punctal Stenosis: Updated Anatomy, Epidemiology, Etiopathology, and Clinical Presentation. Global demographic and etiological variations of retinal vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis: International Uveitis Study Group (IUSG) Retinal Vasculitis Study (ReViSe) Report 1.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1